Comparison of computed tomographic angiography versus rubidium-82 positron emission tomography for the detection of patients with anatomical coronary artery disease

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 801-807

  Chow, Benjamin J W ^a,b,c   Dennie, Carole ^b   Hoffmann, Udo ^d   So, Derek ^a   deKemp, Robert A ^a   Ruddy, Terrence D ^a,b,c   Beanlands, Rob S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b Department of Radiology ^*  (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomographic coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Diagnosis; Positron emission tomography

Indexed keywords

RUBIDIUM 82;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MALE; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX PAIN;

EID: 34748921764     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0828-282X(07)70831-0     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151:404-11.
2. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: Patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004;110:2638-43.
3. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Sclamitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005;293:2471-8. (Erratum in 2005;294:1208).
4. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2265-70.
5. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: Initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1230-7.
6. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051-4.
7. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1043-8.
8. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:123-7.
9. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:128-32.
10. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:92-100.
11. Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S, et al. ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: Assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1413-9.
12. Cademartiri F, Marano R, Luccichenti G, et al. Image assessment with multislice CT coronary angiography. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005;109:198-207.
13. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Marano R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-row multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of coronary segments. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005;109:91-7.
14. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, Marshall AJ. Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2005;91:308-13.
15. Burgstahler C, Beck T, Kuettner A, et al. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in elderly patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:734-8.
16. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart 2005;91:938-41.
17. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16×0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1978-86.
18. Aviram G, Finkelstein A, Herz I, et al. Clinical value of 16-slice multi-detector CT compared to invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2005;7:21-8.
19. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH; CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006;296:403-11.
20. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1896-910.
21. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1899-905.
22. Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1303-10.
23. Grover-McKay M, Ratib O, Schwaiger M, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with positron emission tomography and rubidium 82. Am Heart J 1992;123:646-52.
24. Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Stewart WJ, Salcedo EE. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease using exercise echocardiography and positron emission tomography: Comparison and analysis of discrepant results. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992;5:231-8.
25. Chow BJ, Hoffmann U, Nieman K. Computed tomographic coronary angiography: An alternative to invasive coronary angiography. Can J Cardiol 2005;21:933-40.
26. Kuettner A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:831-9.
27. Graham MM, Faris PD, Ghali WA, et al; APPROACH Investigators (Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease. Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort. Am Heart J 2001;142:254-61.
28. Chow BJ, Ananthasubramaniam K, dekemp RA, Dalipaj MM, Beanlands RS, Ruddy TD. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1227-34.
29. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; American Society for Nuclear. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging - executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1318-33.
30. Townsend DW, Beyer T, Jerin J, Watson CC, Young J, Nutt R. The ECAT ART scanner for positron emission tomography. 1. Improvements in performance characteristics. Clin Positron Imaging 1999;2:5-15.
31. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: Differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:535-43. (Erratum in 1998;98:190).
32. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 2. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6:G47-84.
33. Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1029-39.
34. Parkash R, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD, et al. Potential utility of rubidium 82 PET quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:440-49. (Erratum in 2004;11:756).
35. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: First experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7.
36. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-23.
37. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7.
38. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-54.
39. Thompson RC, Cullom SJ. Issues regarding radiation dosage of cardiac nuclear and radiography procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:19-23.
40. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Annals of the IRCP, vol 18/1-4. Elsevier, 1987.
41. Bacharach SL, Bax JJ, Case J, et al. PET myocardial glucose metabolism and perfusion imaging: Part 1 - guidelines for data acquisition and patient preparation. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:543-56.
42. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:G5-G58.
43. Califf RM, Phillips HR, Hindman MC, et al. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1055-63.
44. Schwaiger M, Ziegler S, Nekolla SG. PET/CT: Challenge for nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1664-78.
45. Miller TD, Hodge DO, Christian TF, Milavetz JJ, Bailey KR, Gibbons RJ. Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Med 2002;112:290-7.
46. Cecil MP, Kosinski AS, Jones MT, et al. The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:735-42.
47. Schwartz RS, Jackson WG, Celio PV, Richardson LA, Hickman JR. Accuracy of exercise 201Tl myocardial scintigraphy in asymptomatic young men. Circulation 1993;87:165-72.
48. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: First clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1294-300.
49. Namdar M, Hany TF, Koepfli P, et al. Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: A feasibility study. J Nucl Med 2005;46:930-35.