A corpus based investigation of morphological disagreement in anaphoric relations

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 1995-1999

  Barbu, Càtàlina ^a   Evans, Richard ^a   Mitkov, Ruslan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRITISH NATIONAL CORPORA; CORPUS-BASED; PRONOUN RESOLUTION; TECHNICAL MANUALS;

EID: 34748920396     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Breck Baldwin. 1997. Cogniac: High precision coreference with limited knowledge and linguistic resources. In R. Mitkov and B. Boguraev, editors, Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution for unrestricted texts, pages 38 - 45.
2. Catalina Barbu and Ruslan Mitkov. 2001. Evaluation tool for rule-based anaphora resolution methods. In Proceedings of ACL'01, Toulouse, France.
3. Michael Barlow. 1998. Feature mismatches in anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of DAARC'98, Lancaster, UK.
4. Lou Burnard. 1995. Users Reference Guide British National Corpus Version 1.0. Oxford University Computing Services, UK.
5. M. Carreiras. 1997. Plural pronouns and the representation of their antecedents. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, (9):53-87.
6. C. Clifton and F. Ferreira. 1987. Discourse structure and anaphora: some experimental results. In M. Coltheart, editor, Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading, pages 635-654. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
7. M. Denber. 1998. Automatic resolution of anaphora in english. Technical report, Eastman Kodak Co, Imaging Science Division.
8. A. Garnham. 1992. Minimalism versus constructionism: A false dichotomy in theories of inference during reading. Psycoloquy, 3(63):Reading Inference, 1.1.
9. S.C. Garrod and A.J. Sanford. 1982. The mental representation of discourse in a focused memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. Journal of semantics, (1):21-41.
10. M. A. Gernsbacher. 1991. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, (6):81- 105.
11. John Hale and Eugene Charniak. 1998. Getting useful gender statistics from english text. Technical Report CS- 98-06.
12. Christopher Kennedy and Branimir Boguraev. 1996. Anaphora for everyone: pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96), pages 113-118, Copenhagen, Denmark.
13. Shalom Lappin and H.J. Leass. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):535 - 562.
14. Ruslan Mitkov. 1998. Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'98/ACL'98), pages 867 - 875. Morgan Kaufmann.
15. R. Mitkov. 2002. Anaphor resolution. Studies in Language and Linguistics. Longman.
16. J. Oakhill, A. Garnham, M.A. Gernsbacher, and K. Cain. 1992. How natural are conceptual anaphors? Language and Cognitive Processes, (7):257-280.
17. C. Orasan and R. Evans. 2001. Learning to identify animate references. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL- 2001), ACL2001.
18. A.J. Sanford and F. Lockhart. 1990. Description types and methods of conjoining as factors influencing plural anaphora: A continuation study of focus. Journal of Semantics, (7):365-378.