Pancreas graft drainage in recipient duodenum: Preliminary experience

Transplantation

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 795-797

  De Roover, Arnaud ^a   Coimbra, Carla ^a   Detry, Olivier ^a   Van Kemseke, Catherine ^a   Squifflet, Jean Paul ^a   Honore, Pierre ^a   Meurisse, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Monitoring; Pancreas; Rejection; Transplantation

Indexed keywords

MYCOPHENOLIC ACID 2 MORPHOLINOETHYL ESTER; PANCREAS ENZYME; STEROID; TACROLIMUS; THYMOCYTE ANTIBODY;

ABDOMINAL BLEEDING; ARTICLE; CYSTOSCOPY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; DUODENUM; DUODENUM BIOPSY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; INTESTINE GRAFT; MORBIDITY; PANCREAS BIOPSY; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; PROTEIN URINE LEVEL; RECIPIENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; SURVIVAL RATE;

DUODENUM; HUMANS; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 34748920050     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000281401.88231.da     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United Sates (US) and non-S cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004. Clin Transplant 2005; 19: 433.
2. Sutherland DE, Gruessner RW, Dunn DL, et al. Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 463.
3. Gruessner RW, Nakhleh R, Tzardis P, et al. Differences in rejection grading after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation in pigs. Transplantation 1994; 57: 1021.
4. Hawthorne WJ, Allen RD, Greenberg ML, et al. Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant rejection: separate or synchronous events? Transplantation 1997; 63: 352.
5. Bartlett ST, Schweitzer EJ, Johnson LB, et al. Equivalent success of simultaneous pancreas kidney and solitary pancreas transplantation. A prospective trial of tacrolimus immunosuppression with percutaneous biopsy. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 440.
6. Shapiro R, Jordan ML, Scantlebury VP, et al. Renal Allograft rejection with normal renal function in simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients: Does Dissynchronous rejection really exist? Transplantation 2000; 69: 440.
7. Sugitani A, Egidi MF, Gritsch HA, Corry RJ. Serum lipase as a marker for pancreatic allograft rejection. Clin Transplant 1998; 12: 224.
8. Benedetti E, Najarian JS, Gruessner AC, et al. Correlation between cystoscopic biopsy results and hypoamylasuria in bladder-drained pancreas transplants. Surgery 1995; 118: 864.
9. Laftavi MR, Gruessner AC, Bland BJ, et al. Diagnosis of pancreas rejection: cystoscopic transduodenal versus percutaneous computed tomography scan-guided biopsy. Transplantation 1998; 65: 528.
10. Kuhr CS, Davis CL, Barr D, et al. Use of ultrasound and cystoscopically guided pancreatic allograft biopsies and transabdominal renal allograft biopsies: Safety and efficacy in kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. J Urol 1995; 153: 316.
11. Carpenter HA, Engen DE, Munn SR, et al. Histologic diagnosis of rejection by using cystoscopically directed needle biopsy specimen from dysfunctional pancreatoduodenal allografts with exocrine drainage into the bladder. Am J Surg Pathol 1990; 14: 837.
12. Lee BC, McGahan JP, Perez RV, Boone JM. The role of percutaneous biopsy in detection of pancreatic transplant rejection. Clin Transplant 2000; 14: 493.
13. Allen RD, Wilson TG, Grierson JM, et al. Percutaneous biopsy of bladder-drained pancreas transplants. Transplantation 1991; 51: 1213.
14. Klassen DK, Weir MR, Cangro CB, et al. Pancreas allograft biopsy: Safety of percutaneous biopsy-results of a large experience. Transplantation 2002; 73: 553.
15. Boggi U, Vistoli F, Signori S, et al. A technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1137.
16. Shokouh-Amiri MH, Gaber AO, Gaber LW, et al. Pancreas Transplantation with portal venous drainage and enteric exocrine diversion: A new technique. Transpl Proc 1992; 24: 776.
17. DeRoover A, de Leval L, Gilmaire J, et al. Luminal contact with University of Wisconsin solution improves human small bowel preservation. Transpl Proc 2004; 36: 273.
18. Olson DW, Jihon H, Madsen KL, et al. Human small bowel storage: The role for luminal preservation solutions. Transplantation 2003; 76: 709.
19. Olson DW, Kadota S, Cornish A, et al. Intestinal decontamination using povidone-iodine compromises small bowel storage quality. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1460.
20. Humar A, Ramcharan T, Kandaswamy R, et al. Technical failures after pancreas transplants: Why grafts fail and the risk factors-a multivariate analysis. Transplantation 2004; 78: 1188.
21. Nakhleh RE, Benedetti E, Gruessner A, et al. Cystoscopic biopsies in pancreaticoduodenal transplantation. Are duodenal biopsies indicative of pancreas dysfunction? Transplantation 1995; 60: 541.