Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean

Natural Language Semantics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 187-219

  Chung, Kyung Sook ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aspect; Deixis; Evidentiality; Perceptual field; Perfect; Spatial deictic tense; Tense

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748892968     PISSN: 0925854X     EISSN: 1572865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11050-007-9017-8     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aikhenvald A.Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford, Oxford University Press
2. Aksu-Koç A.A., Slobin D.I. (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In: Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 150-167
3. Anderson L.B. (1986). Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In; Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 173-312
4. Chang K.-H. (1985). Hyentay Kwukeuy Yangsang-Pemcwu Yenkwu (A study of modality categories in Modern Korean). Seoul, Tower Press
5. Choi H.-B. (1983). Wuli Malbon (Our grammar) (10th ed). Seoul, Chungumsa
6. Choi D.-J. (1994). On the meaning of the pre-final -te- in Modern Korean: In the case of sentence-final position. Language Research, 30(1): 41-74
7. Choi S.-J. (1995). The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In: Bybee J., Fleishman S. (eds). Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 165-204
8. Chung K.-S. (2004) The Korean suffix -te as spatio-temporal deictic tense. In: Chand V. et al. (eds) Proceedings of the WCCFL 23. Somerville MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 140-153
9. Chung, K.-S. (2005). Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality, and speech act in Korean. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
10. Chung K.-S. (2006a). The Korean suffix -ess: The perfect and the indirect evidential. In: Kuno S. et al. (eds). Harvard studies in Korean inguistics 11. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 401-414
11. Chung K.-S. (2006b). Toward an integrated theory of the perfect and the indirect evidential. In: Davis C., Deal A.R., Zabbal Y. (eds). Proceedings of NELS 36. Amherst, GLSA University of Massachusetts, pp. 217-228
12. Chung K.-S. (2006c). Korean evidentials and assertion'. In: Baumer D., Montero D., Scanlon M. (eds). Proceedings of WCCFL 25. Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press, pp. 105-113
13. Cinque G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press
14. DeLancey S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 369-382
15. Faller M. (2004). The deictic core of 'non-experienced past' in Cuzco Quechua. Journal of Semantics, 21, 45-85
16. Garrett E. (2000). Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. University of California, Los Angeles, PhD Dissertation
17. Gim C.-K. (1980). Kuwkesice Hyengtaysouy Uymi: Hoysang Hyengtaysolul Cuwngsimulo (The semantics of Korean tense morphemes: With focus on the retrospective morpheme -te-). Han-Geul, 169, 45-116
18. Giorgi A., Pianesi F. (1997). Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford, Oxford University Press
19. Givón T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. Amsterdam, John Benjamins
20. Han D.-W. (1996). Kuwkeuy Sicey Yenkuw (A study on Korean tense). Seoul, Kuwkehakhoy, Taehaksa
21. Huddleston R. (1977). The futurate construction, Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 730-736
22. Im H.-B. (1982). Senemal -Te-Wa Tanceluy Yangsang (The pre-final -te-and the modality of discontinuity). Kwanak Emwun Yenkwu, 7, 433-475
23. Im H.-B. (1993). Kuwkeuy Sicey Yenkuw (A study on Korean tense). Kwukehak, 23, 255-323
24. Izvorski R. (1997). The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In: Lawson A., Cho E. (eds). Proceedings of SALT 7. Ithaca, NY, CLC Publications, pp. 222-239
25. Kim, Y.-J. (1990). The syntax and semantics of Korean case: The interaction between lexical and semantic levels of representation. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.
26. Kim S.-W., Maling J. (1993). Syntactic case and frequency adverbials in Korean. In: Kuno S., Whitman J., Kang Y.-S. (eds). Harvard studies in Korean linguistics 5. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 368-378
27. Kratzer A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In: Strolovitch D., Lawson A. (eds). Proceedings of SALT. Ithaca NY, CLC Publications, pp. 92-3110
28. Lazard, G. (1999). Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?. Linguistic Typology, 3, 91-109
29. Lee H.-S. (1991). Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological erspective. University of California, Los Angeles, PhD Dissertation
30. Lee H.-S. (1993a). The temporal system of noun-modifying (attributive) clauses in Korean from a typological perspective. Studies in Language, 17, 75-110
31. Lee H.-S. (1993b). Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information: With reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 135-167
32. Lee K.-D. (1993). A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul, Hankuk Munhwasa
33. Matthewson L. (2006). Temporal semantics in a supposedly tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, 673-713
34. Nam K.-S. (1978). Kwuke Mwunpepuy Sicemwunceyey Kwanhan Yenkwu (A study of Korean tense phenomena). Seoul, Top Press
35. Nichols J. (1986). The bottom line: Chinese Pidgin Russian. In: Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of pistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 239-257
36. Reichenbach H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York, The Free Press
37. Schlichter A. (1986). The origins and deictic nature of Wintu evidentials. In: Chafe W., Nichols J. (eds). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp, pp. 46-59
38. Shaer, B. (1996). Making sense of tense: Tense, time reference, and linking theory. PhD Dissertation, McGill University.
39. Smith C.S. (1997). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht, Kluwer
40. Sohn H.-M. (1975). Retrospection in Korean. Language Research, 11, 87-103
41. Sohn H.-M. (1994). Korean. London, Routledge
42. Speas M., Tenny C. (2003). Configurational properties of point of view roles. In: Di Scuillo A.M. (eds). Asymmetry in grammar, Vol. 1: Syntax and semantics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 315-343
43. Suh C.-S. (1977). -Te-Nun Hoysanguy Kinungul Kacinunka? Congkyelpepkwa Inyongpepuy -Te-Lul Cwungsimulo (Does -te-have a retrospective function? Focusing on the sentence-final -te-and the -te-in quotations). Ene (Linguistic Journal of Korea), 2, 97-127
44. Suh C.-S. (1996). Kwuke Mwunpep (A Korean grammar). Seoul, Hanyang University Press
45. Verkuyl H., Zwarts J. (1992). Time and space in conceptual and logical semantics: The notion path. Utrecht, OTS
46. Willett T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12, 51-97
47. Yang I.-S. (1972). Korean syntax: Case markers, delimiters, complementation, and relativization. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, PhD Dissertation
48. Yu D.-S. (1981). -Te-uy Uymiey Tayhan Kwankyen (A view on the semantics of -te-). Kwanak Emwun Yenkwu, 6, 205-226