Extending stated choice analysis to recognise agent-specific attribute endogeneity in bilateral group negotiation and choice: A think piece

Transportation

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 667-679

  Hensher, David A ^a   Puckett, Sean M ^a   Rose, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Agent interaction; Attribute endogeneity; Equilibrium preferences; Stated choice; True bargaining set

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EQUILIBRIUM PREFERENCES; STATED ENDOGENOUS ATTRIBUTE LEVEL ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; MODELING;

EID: 34748879960     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-007-9124-x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aribarg, A., Arora, N., Bodur, H.O.: Understanding the role of preference revision and concession in group decisions. J. Marketing Res. 39, 336-349 (2002)
2. Bergantino, A.S., Bolis, S.: An adaptive conjoint analysis of freight service alternatives: Evaluating the maritime option. In: Schintler, L., Reggiani, A. (eds.) Methods and Models in Transport and Telecommunications: Cross-atlantic Perspectives, pp. 235-265. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2007)
3. Bradley, M., Daly, A.: New analysis issues in stated preference research. In: Ortuzar, J. de D. (ed.) Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, Perspectives 4. PTRC London (2000)
4. Brewer, A., Hensher, D.A.: DistriTuted work and travel behaviour: the dynamics of interactive agency choices between employers and employees. Transportation 27, 117-148 (2000)
5. Dosman, D., Adamowicz, W.: Combining stated and revealed preference data to construct an empirical examination of intrahousehold bargaining. Rev. Econ. Household 4, 15-34 (2006)
6. Fowkes, A.S., Firmin, P.E., Tweddle, G., Whiteing, A.E.: How highly does the freight transport industry value journey time reliability - and for what reasons? Int. J. Logistics 7, 33-43 (2004)
7. Green, P., Krieger, A., Agarwal, M.K.: Adaptive conjoint analysis: Some caveats and suggestions. J. Marketing Res. 23, 215-222 (1991)
8. Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A.: Mixed logit and heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components. Transport. Res. E (2007)
9. Hauser J., Toubia O.: The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Market. Sci. 24, 498-507 (2005)
10. Hensher, D.A.: How do respondents handle stated choice experiments? - attribute processing strategies under varying information load. J. Appl. Econometrics 21, 861-878 (2006)
11. Hensher, D.A., Chow, G.: Interacting agents and discrete choices in logistics outsourcing: A conceptual framework. In: Meersman, H., van de Voorde, E., Winkelman, W. (eds.) World Transport Research, vol 3: Transport Modelling/Assessment, pp. 365-376. Pergamon Presss, Oxford (1999)
12. Hensher, D.A., Puckett, S.M.: Power, Concession and Cooperation amongst Interdependent Urban Freight Stakeholders: An Application to Distance-Based Road User Charging. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney (2006)
13. Hensher D.A., Puckett S., Rose J.: Agency Decision Making in Freight Distribution Chains: Revealing a Parsimonious Empirical Strategy from Alternative Behavioural Structures, for Special Issue of Transportation Research B on Behavioural insights into the Modelling of Freight Transportation and Distribution Systems (in press)
14. Holguin-Veras, J., Thorson, E., Ozbay, K.: Preliminary results of an experimental economics application to urban goods modelling research. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., January 2004
15. Johnson, R.: Comment on adaptive Sonjoint analysis: some caveats and suggestions. J. Marketing Res. 28, 223-225 (1991)
16. Kanninen, B.J.: Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. J. Marketing Res. 39, 214-217 (2002)
17. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.: Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
18. Rose, J.M., Bliemer, M.C.J.: Constructing Efficient Choice Experiments with Alternative Specific and Generic Parameter Estimates. Working Paper, University of Sydney, April (2005)
19. Rose, J., Hensher, D.A.: Modelling agent interdependency in group decision making: Methodological approaches to interactive agent choice experiments. Transportation Res. E. 40, 63-79 (2004)
20. Toubia, O., Simester, D., Hauser, J.R.: Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Working paper, Center for Innovation in Product Development, MIT, Cambridge, MA (2003)