Profit tax competition and formula apportionment

International Tax and Public Finance

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 631-655

  Pethig, Rüdiger ^a   Wagener, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Formula apportionment; Tax competition

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748872568     PISSN: 09275940     EISSN: 15736970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-006-9017-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anand, B., & Sansing, R. (2000). The weighting game: Formula apportionment as an instrument of public policy. National Tax Journal, 53, 183-199.
2. Bayindir-Upmann, T., & Ziad, A. (2005). Existence of equilibria in a basic tax-competition model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 1-22.
3. Cnossen, S. (2002). Tax policy in the European Union: A review of issues and options. Finanzarchiv, 58, 466-558.
4. Devereux, M. P., & Griffith, R. (2001). Summary of the "Devereux and Griffith" economic model and measures of effective tax rates. Annex A of European Commission (2001).
5. Eggert, W., & Schjelderup, G. (2003). Symmetric tax competition and formula apportionment. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5, 439-446.
6. European Commission (2001). Company taxation in the internal market. COM(2001), 582final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
7. Goolsbee, A., & Maydew, E. (2000). Coveting thy neighbor's manufacturing: The dilemma of state income apportionment. Journal of Public Economics, 75, 125-143.
8. Gordon, R., & Wilson, J. D. (1986). An examination of multijurisdictional corporate income taxation under formula apportionment. Econometrica, 54, 1357-1373.
9. Hellerstein, W., & McLure, C. E. (2004). The European commission's report on company income taxation: What the EU can learn from the experience of the US States. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 199-220.
10. Iritani, J., & Fujii, Y. (2002). A note on non-existence of equilibria in tax competition models. Discussion Paper 0206. Kobe, Japan: Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
11. Kolmar, M., & Wagener, A. (2006). The role of the tax base in tax competition with formula apportionment. Mimeo. Hannover, Germany: University of Hannover.
12. Laussel, D., & Le Breton, M. (1998). Existence of Nash equilibria in fiscal competition models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28, 283-296.
13. Martens Weiner, J. (2002a). Formula apportionment and the future of company taxation in the European Union. CESifo Forum, 1/2002, 10-20.
14. Martens Weiner, J. (2002b). Would introducing formula apportionment in the European Union be a dream come true or the EU's worst nightmare? Ifo Studien, 48, 419-432.
15. Martens-Weiner, J. (2005). Company tax reform in the European Union. New York: Springer.
16. Mintz, J. M. (2002). Company taxation and the internal market. CESifo Forum, 1/2002, 3-9.
17. Nielsen, S. B., Raimondos-Møller, P., & Schjelderup, G. (2003). Formula apportionment and transfer pricing under oligopolistic competition. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5, 419-437.
18. Nielsen, S. B., Raimondos-Møller, P., & Schjelderup, G. (2004). Company taxation and tax spillovers: Separate accounting versus formula apportionment. Mimeo. Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School.
19. Sørensen, P. B. (2004). Company tax reform in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 91-115.
20. Wellisch, D. (2004). Taxation under formula apportionment-tax competition, tax incidence, and the choice of apportionment factors. Finanzarchiv, 60, 24-41.
21. Wildasin, D. (2000). State and provincial corporate income taxation. Current practice and policy issues for the United States and Canada. Canadian Tax Journal, 48, 424-441.
22. Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52, 269-304.
23. Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation and under-provision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356-370.