Molecular kinetics modeling in hemodialysis: On-line molecular monitoring and spectral analysis

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 582-586

  Fernández, Elmer Andrés ^a,b   Perazzo, Carlos Alberto ^b,c   Valtuille, Rodolfo ^d   Willshaw, Peter ^e   Balzarini, Mónica ^b,f  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^b CONICET ^*  (Argentina)

^c FAVALORO UNIVERSITY   (Argentina)

^d Fresenius Medical Care Argentina   (Argentina)

^e SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PATIENT MONITORING;

HEMODIALYSIS; MOLECULAR KINETICS;

DIALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; UREA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIALYSATE; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; ONLINE MONITORING; SPECTROSCOPY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINETICS; MALE; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RENAL DIALYSIS; UREA;

EID: 34748872526     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318145bb31     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Depner TA: History of dialysis quantification. Semin Dial 12(S1): 14-19, 1999.
2. Nissenson AR, Fine RN: Clinical Dialysis, 4th ed., New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 2005.
3. Locatelli F: Dose of dialysis, convection and hemodialysis patients outcome: what the HEMO study doesn't tell us: the European viewpoint. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18: 1061-1065, 2003.
4. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, et al: Effects of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 347: 2010-2019, 2002.
5. Locatelli F, Hannedouche T, Jacobson S, et al: The effect of membrane permeability on ESRD: design of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. J Nephrol 12: 85-88, 1999.
6. David S, Bottalico D, Tagliavini D, Mandolfo S, et al: Behaviour of B2-microglobulin removal with different dialysis schedules. Nephrol Dial Transplant S 6: 49-54, 1998.
7. Canaud B, Morena M, Cristol JP, Krieter D: B2-microglobulin, a uremic toxin with a double meaning. Kidney Int 69: 1297-1299, 2006.
8. Arrigo G, Tetta C, Santoro A, et al: Continuous urea monitoring in hemodialysis: a model approach to forecast dialytic performance: results of a multicenter study. J Nephrol 14: 481-487, 2002.
9. Arrigo G, Beltrame A, Colasanti G: Adequacy in hemodialysis: new concepts derived from online urea monitoring. Kidney Int 58(S76): 41-46, 2000.
10. Basham LM, Nurs B, MacDonnal Agar JW: Time spent on dialysis: the paramount consideration in dialysis adequacy? A new application for the Biostat 1000 on-line urea monitor. Dial Transplant 26: 730-748, 1997.
11. Ronco C, Brendolan A, Crepaldi C, et al: On-line urea monitoring: a further step towards adequate dialysis prescription and delivery. Int J Artif Organs 18: 534-543, 1995.
12. Liberati D, Turkheimer F: Linear spectral deconvolution of catabolic plasma concentration decay in dialysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 37: 391-395, 1999.
13. Turkheimer F, Moresco RM, Lucignani G, et al: The use of spectral analysis to determine regional cerebral glucose utilization with positron emission tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose: theory, Implementation and optimization procedures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 14: 406-422, 1994.
14. Schmidt K: Which linear compartmental systems can be analyzed by spectral analysis of PET output data summed over all compartments? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 19: 560-569, 1999.
15. Keshaviah PR, Ebben JP, Emerson PF: On-line monitoring of the delivery of the hemodialysis prescription. Pediatr Nephrol 9: S2-S8, 1995.
16. Depner TA, Keshaviah PR, Ebben JP, et al: Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 464-471, 1996.
17. Marshal MR, Santamaria P, Collins JF: Biostat 1000 and Daugirdas blood-based hemodialysis quantification: agreement and reproducibility. Am J Kidney Dis 31: 1011-1018, 1998.
18. Sternby J: Urea sensors: a world of possibilities. AdvRen Replace Ther 6: 265-272, 1999.
19. Fazio F, Schmidt K, Turkheimer F, Lucinani G, Sokoloff L: Spectral analytic methods for multi-exponential fitting by constrained minimization of 1, 2 or ∞ norm. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 15(S1): S120, 1995.
20. Dell RB, Sciacca R, Lieberman K, Case DB, Cannon PJ: A weighted least-squares technique for the analysis of kinetic data and its application to the study of renal 133Xenon washout in dogs and man. Circ Res 32: 71-84, 1973.
21. Canaud B, Bocs J, Leray-Morangues H, Navino C, Verzetti G, Thomaseth K: Urea as a marker of adequacy in hemodialysis: lesson from in vivo urea dynamics monitoring. Kidney Int 58: S76: S28-S40, 2000.
22. Uhlin F, Fridolin I, Magnusson M, Lindberg LG: Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 2225-2231, 2006.
23. Fridolin I, Lindberg L: G: On-line monitoring of solutes using wavelength-dependent absorption of ultraviolet radiation. Med Biol Eng Comp 41: 263-270, 2003.
24. Olesberg JT, Arnold MA, Flanigan M: Online measurement of urea concentration in spent dialysate during hemodialysis. Clin Chem 50: 175-181, 2004.