Three-dimensional MDCT gastrography compared with axial CT for the detection of early gastric cancer

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 741-749

  Shin, Kyung Sook ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^b   Han, Joon Koo ^b   Lee, Jeong Min ^b   Lee, Hyuk Joon ^b   Yang, Han Kwang ^b   Choi, Byung Ihn ^b,c  

^a Chungnam National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Stomach CT; Stomach CT gastrography; Stomach neoplasm

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; ENDOSCOPY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

3-DIMENSIONAL; BODY ANGLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; GASTRIC CANCERS; MULTIDETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; STOMACH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; STOMACH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY GASTROGRAPHY; STOMACH NEOPLASM;

VOLUME RENDERING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AXIAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; BARIUM ENEMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOMACH; STOMACH CANCER;

EID: 34748851950     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318033de8e     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dupont JB Jr, Lee JR, Burton GR, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: review of 1,497 cases. Cancer. 1978;41:941-947.
2. Abbas SM, Booth MW. Correlation between the current TNM staging and long-term survival after curative D1 lymphadenectomy for stomach cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:294-299.
3. Desai AM, Pareek M, Nightingale PG, et al. Improving outcomes in gastric cancer over 20 years. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:196-201.
4. Maruyama M, Hamada T. Diagnosis of gastric cancer in Japan. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW, eds. Margulis and Burhenne's Alimentary Tract Radiology. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1994: 399-428.
5. Maruyama MRC II, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, et al. Extended local resection for advanced gastric cancer: increased survival versus increased morbidity. Ann Surg. 2002;236:159-165.
6. Yan-Quiroz EF, Diaz-Plasencia JA, Burgos-Chavez OA, et al. Five-year survival prognosis factors in patients with resectable advanced serosa exposed gastric carcinoma. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2003;23:184-191. Article in Spanish.
7. Nitti D, Marchet A, Mammano E, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy (D2) in patients with early gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:875-881.
8. Carter KJ, Schaffer HA, Ritchie WP Jr. Early gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 1984;199:604-609.
9. Hori S, Tsuda K, Murayama S, et al. CT of gastric carcinoma: preliminary results with a new scanning technique. Radiographics. 1992;12:257-268.
10. Mani NB, Suri S, Gupta S, et al. Two-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography with water-filling method for staging gastric cancer. Clin Imaging. 2001;25:38-43.
11. Minami M, Kawauchi N, Itai Y, et al. Gastric tumors: radiologic- pathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT. Radiology. 1992;185:173-178.
12. Tsuda K, Hori S, Murakami T, et al. Intramural invasion of gastric cancer: evaluation by CT with water-filling method. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:941-947.
13. Cho JS, Kim JK, Rho SM, et al. Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical iv. injection of contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:69-75.
14. Fukuya T, Honda H, Kaneko K, et al. Efficacy of helical CT in T-staging of gastric cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:73-81.
15. Takao M, Fukuda T, Iwanaga S, et al. Gastric cancer: evaluation of triphasic spiral CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:288-294.
16. Lee JH, Jeong YK, Kim DH, et al. Two-phase helical CT for detection of early gastric carcinoma: importance of the mucosal phase for analysis of the abnormal mucosal layer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24:777-782
17. Kim SH, Han JK, Lee KH, et al. Computed tomography gastrography with volume-rendering technique: correlation with double-contrast barium study and conventional gastroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:140-149.
18. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. Radiographics. 2003;23:75-87.
19. Bhandari S, Shim CS, Kim JH, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:619-626.
20. Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, et al. Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology. 2005;236:879-885.
21. Horton KM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:199-212.
22. Chung DJ, Huh KC, Choi WJ, et al. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:98-103.
23. Gluecker T, Dorta G, Keller W, et al. Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gut. 2002;51:207-211.
24. Heath DG, Soyer PA, Kuszyk BS, et al. Three-dimensional spiral CT during arterial portography: comparison of three rendering techniques. Radiographics. 1995;15:1001-1011.
25. Johnson PT, Heath DG, Bliss DF, et al. Three-dimensional CT: real-time interactive volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:581-583.
26. Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V, et al. Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology. 1996;199:321-330.
27. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, et al. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics. 1999;19:745-764.
28. Hopper KD, Iyriboz AT, Wise SW, et al. Mucosal detail at CT virtual reality: surface versus volume rendering. Radiology. 2000;214:517-522.
29. Lee SI, Choi YS, Park DJ, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:874-880.
30. Kim SH, Lee JM, Han JK, et al. Effect of adjusted positioning on gastric distention and fluid distribution during CT gastrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1180-1184.
31. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
32. Chen CY, Wu DC, Kang WY, et al. Staging of gastric cancer with 16-channel MDCT. Abdom Imaging. 2006. Epub ahead of print.
33. Gossios KJ, Tsianos EV, Demou LL, et al. Use of water or air as oral contrast media for computed tomographic study of the gastric wall: comparison of the two techniques. Gastrointest Radiol. 1991;16:293-297.
34. Inoue H. Endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal and gastric mucosal cancers. Can J Gastroenterol. 1998;12:355-359.
35. Ooyanagi H, Fu KI, Ishikawa T, et al. A useful new endoscopic marking technique for endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2004;36:91.
36. Lee DH, Ko YT. The role of 3D spiral CT in early gastric carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:709-713.
37. Vining DJ. Virtual endoscopy: is it reality? Radiology. 1996;200:30-31.
38. Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:41-48.