The challenges of building advanced mechatronic systems

FoSE 2007: Future of Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 72-84

  Schäfer, Wilhelm ^a   Wehrheim, Heike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WASHING MACHINES;

DEGREE OF ADAPTIBILITY; ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS; MECHATRONIC RAIL SYSTEM;

MECHATRONICS;

EID: 34748847108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FOSE.2007.28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. E. Ábrahám, T. Schubert, B. Becker, M. Fränzle, and C. Herde. Parallel SAT solving in bounded model checking. In Proc. of PDMC'06, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 2006.
2. R. Alur, F. Ivancic, J. Kim, I. Lee, and O. Sokolsky. Generating embedded software from hierarchical hybrid models. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Language, compiler, and tool for embedded systems, pages 171-182. ACM Press, 2003.
3. T. Ball, A. Podelski, and S. K. Rajamani. Boolean and Cartesian Abstraction for Model Checking C Programs. In T. Margaria and W. Yi, editors, TACAS, volume 2031 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 268-283. Springer, 2001.
4. C. Barrett, L. de Moura, and A. Stump. SMT-COMP: Satisfiability Modulo Theories Competition. In K. Etessami and S. Rajamani, editors, 17th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pages 20-23. Springer, 2005.
5. A. Bauer, M. Broy, J. Romberg, B. Schätz, P. Braun, U. Freund, N. Mata, R. Sandner, and D. Ziegenbein. AutoMoDe - Notations, Methods, and Tools for Model-Based Development of Automotive Software. In Proceedings of the SAE 2005 World Congress. Society of Automotive Engineers, 2005.
6. J. Bauer, I. Schaefer, T. Toben, and B. Westphal. Specification and Verification of Dynamic Communication Systems. In K. Goossens and L. Petrucci, editors, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD 2006), Turku, Finland, June 2006. IEEE.
7. thInternational Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Shanghai, China. ACM Press, 2006.
8. G. Behrmann, A. David, K. G. Larsen, O. Möller, P. Pettersson, and W. Yi. Uppaal - Present and Future. In 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001.
9. K. Bender, M. Broy, I. Peter, A. Pretschner, and T. Stauner. Model based development of hybrid systems. In Modelling, Analysis, and Design of Hybrid Systems, volume 279 of Lecture Notes on Control and Information Sciences, pages 37-52. Springer Verlag, July 2002.
10. K. Berkenkötter, S. Bisanz, U. Hannemann, and J. Peleska. Executable HybridUML and its Application to Train Control Systems. In H. Ehrig, W. Damm, J. Desel, M. Große-Rhode, W. Reif, E. Schnieder, and E. Westkämper, editors, Integration of Software Specification Techniques for Applications in Engineering, volume 3147 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 145-173. Springer Verlag, 2004.
11. E. Böde, W. Damm, J. Høyem, B. Josko, J. Niehaus, and M. Segelken. Adding value to automotive models. In M. Broy, I. H. Krüger, and M. Meisinger, editors, ASWSD, volume 4147 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 86-102. Springer, 2004.
12. 20 States and Beyond. Information and Computation, 98(2): 142-170, 1992.
13. S. Burmester, M. Tichy, and H. Giese. Modeling Reconfigurable Mechatronic Systems with Mechatronic UML. In Proc. of Model Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications (MDAFA 2004), Linköping, Sweden (U. ASmann, ed.), pages 155-169, June 2004.
14. E. Clarke, A. Biere, A. Cimatti, and Y Zhu. Symbolic Model Checking Without BDDs. In TACAS 99, number 1579 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 193-207, 1999.
15. E. Clarke, O. Grumberg, and D. Peled. Model checking. MIT Press, 1999.
16. E. M. Clarke, A. Biere, R. Raimi, and Y Zhu. Bounded Model Checking Using Satisfiability Solving. Formal Methods in System Design, 19(1):7-34, 2001.
17. E. M. Clarke, O. Grumberg, S. Jha, Y Lu, and H. Veith. Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement for symbolic model checking. JACM, 50(5):752-794, 2003.
18. M. Dwyer, J. Hatcliff, Robby, C. Pasareanu, and W. Visser. Formai Software Analysis - Emerging Trends in Software Model Checking. In L. Briand and A. Wolf, editors, ICSE: Future of Software Engineering Track, 2007.
19. S. Edelkamp, S. Leue, and A. Lluch-Lafuente. Directed Explicit-State Model Checking in the Validation of Communication Protocols. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 5(2-3):247-267, 2004.
20. R. France and B. Rumpe. Model-driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap. In L. Briand and A. Wolf, editors, ICSE: Future of Software Engineering Track, 2007.
21. H. Giese, S. Burmester, W. Schäfer, and O. Oberschelp. Modular Design and Verification of Component-Based Mechatronic Systems with Online-Reconfiguration. In Proc. of 12th ACM SIGSOFT Foundations of Software Engineering 2004 (FSE 2004), Newport Beach, USA, pages 179-188. ACM Press, November 2004.
22. 2a), October 2006.
23. H. Giese, M. Tichy, S. Burmester, W. Schäfer, and S. Flake. Towards the Compositional Verification of Real-Time UML Designs. In Proc. of the European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC), Helsinki, Finland, pages 38-47. ACM Press, September 2003.
24. T. Henzinger, P-H. Ho, and H. Wong-Toi. HyTech: A Model Checker for Hybrid Systems. Software Tools for Technology Transfer, (1): 110-122, 1997.
25. T. A. Henzinger, C. M. Kirsch, M. A. Sanvido, and W. Pree. From Control Models to Real-Time Code Using Giotto. In IEEE Control Systems Magazine 23(1):50-64, 2003.
26. A preliminary report on this work appeared in CM. Kirsch, M.A.A. Sanvido, T.A. Henzinger, and W. Pree, A Giottobased helicopter control system, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Embedded Software (EMSOFT), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2491, Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 46-60, 2002.
27. J. Kramer and J. Magee. Self-Managed Systems: an Architectural Challenge. In L. Briand and A. Wolf, editors, ICSE: Future of Software Engineering Track, 2007.
28. C. Loiseaux, S. Graf, J. Sifakis, A. Bouajjani, and S. Bensalem. Property preserving abstractions for the verification of concurrent systems. Formal methods in system design, 6:1-35, 1995.
29. Z. Manna and A. Pnueli. The Temporal Verification of Reactive and Concurrent Systems - Safety Properties. Springer, 1995.
30. M. Mutz, M. Huhn, U. Goltz, and C. Krömke. Model Based System Development in Automotive. In Proceedings SAE World Congress. Society of Automotive Engineers, 2003.
31. B. I. Silva and B. H. Krogh. Formal Verification of Hybrid System Using CheckMate: A Case Study. In American Control Conference, 2000.
32. S. M. L. S. S. SysML Partner, November 2005. version 1.0 alpha, document ad/05-11-14.
33. H. Wehrheim. Inheritance of Temporal Logic Properties. In FMOODS 2003: Formal Methods for Open Object-based Distributed Systems, number 2884 in LNCS, pages 79-93. Springer, 2003.
34. H. Wehrheim. Preserving Properties under Change. In F. de Boer, M. Bonsague, and W. de Roever, editors, Formal Methods for Components and Objects, volume 3188 of LNCS. Springer, 2004.
35. S. Yovine. Kronos: A verification tool for real-time systems. Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1(1/2), 1997.