A quantitative similarity measure for maps

Progress in Spatial Data Handling - 12th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, SDH 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 435-450

  Frank, Richard ^a   Ester, Martin ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERALIZATION OPERATORS; OR APPLICATIONS; QUALITY ASPECTS; SEMANTIC CONTENT; SHAPE SIMILARITY; SIMILARITY MEASURE; UNIFORM FRAMEWORK; USER REQUIREMENTS;

SEMANTICS;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 34648869845     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-35589-8_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. th Int Symp on Spatial Data Handling.
2. Gold C (1999) Crust and Anti-Crust: A one-step boundary and skeleton extraction algorithm. Annual Symp on Computational Geometry, pp 189-196.
3. Dijk SF van, Kreveld MJ van, Strijk T, Wolff A (2002) Towards an evaluation of quality for names placement methods. Int J of Geographical Information Science 16(7):641-661.
4. Aurenhammer F (1991) Voronoi diagrams - A survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Computing Surveys 23(3):345-405.
5. Ware JM, Jones CB (1998) Conflict Reduction in map generalization using iterative improvement. GeoInformatica 2(4):383-407.
6. Joao EM (1998) Causes and consequences of map generalization. Taylor & Francis, London.
7. Hoff III KE, Culver T, Keyser J, Lin M, Manocha D (1999) Fast computation of generalized Voronoi Diagrams using graphics hardware. SIGGRAPH 1999.
8. Longin JL, Lakamper R (2000) Shape similarity measure based on correspondence of visual parts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(10).
9. Mayya N, Rajan VT (1996) Voronoi Diagrams of Polygons: A framework for shape representation. J of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 6(4): 355-378.
10. Klein PN, Sebastian TB, Kimia BB (2001) Shape matching using editdistance: An implementation. Symp on Discrete Algorithms 2001. Twelfth annual ACM-SIAM Symp on Discrete Algorithms, pp 781-790.
11. Rivest S, Bedard Y, Marchand P (2001) Toward better support for spatial decision making: defining the characteristics of spatial on-line analytical processing (SOLAP). GEOMATICA 55:539-555.
12. Spaccapietra S, Parent C, Vangenot C (2000) GIS Databases: From multiscale to multi-representation. In: Proc of the Int Workshop on Emerging Technologies for Geo-Based Applications, LNAI 1864. Springer.
13. Bard S (2002) Quality Assessment of Generalized Geographical Data. Accuracy 2002 Symp.
14. th Int Cartographic Conf.
15. Sebastian TB., Klein PN, Kimia BB (2001) Recognition of Shapes by Editing Shock Graphs. ICCV:755-762.
16. Bedard Y, Bernier E (2002) Supporting multiple representations with spatial databases views management and the concept of VUEL. Joint Workshop on Multi-Scale Representations of Spatial Data, ISPRS WG IV/3, ICA Commission on Map Generalization.
17. Li Z, Yan H, Ai T, Chen J (2004), Automated building generalization based on urban morphology and Gestalt theory. Int J of Geographical Information Science 18(5):513-534.
18. Li Z, Huang P (2002) Quantitative measures for spatial information of maps. Int J of Geographical Information Science 16(7):699-709.