Head trauma

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1619-1621

  Davis, Patricia C ^a  

^a AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

XENON;

BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HEAD INJURY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CODING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SKULL RADIOGRAPHY;

CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CRANIOCEREBRAL TRAUMA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SKULL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34648840007     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Saul TG, and Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Management of Head Injury April 1998
2. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, et al. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000;343:100-05
3. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357:1391-96
4. Haydel MJ. Clinical decision instruments for CT scanning in minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294:1551-53
5. Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, et al. External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294:1519-25
6. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294:1511-18
7. Masters SJ, McClean PM, Arcarese JS, et al. Skull x-ray examinations after head trauma. Recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel and validation study. N Engl J Med 1987;316:84-91
8. National Cancer Institute USNIoH. Radiation risks and pediatric computed tomography (CT): a guide for health care providers.; 2002
9. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81-84
10. Kido DK, Cox C, Hamill RW, et al. Traumatic brain injuries: predictive usefulness of CT. Radiology 1992;182:777-81
11. Reinus WR, Zwemer FL, Jr., Fornoff JR. Prospective optimization of patient selection for emergency cranial computed tomography: univariate and multivariate analyses. Invest Radiol 1996;31:101-08
12. Shackford SR, Wald SL, Ross SE, et al. The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma 1992;33:385-94
13. Livingston DH, Loder PA, Hunt CD. Minimal head injury, is admission necessary? Am Surg 1991;57:14-17
14. Nagy KK, Joseph KT, Krosner SM, et al. The utility of head computed tomography after minimal head injury. J Trauma 1999;46:268-70
15. Stein SC, O'Malley KF, Ross SE. Is routine computed tomography scanning too expensive for mild head injury? Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:1286-89
16. Dietrich AM, Bowman MJ, Ginn-Pease ME, et al. Pediatric head injuries: can clinical factors reliably predict an abnormality on computed tomography? Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1535-40
17. Homer CJ, Kleinman L. Technical report: minor head injury in children. Pediatrics 1999;104:e78
18. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18-19, 2001. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:217-313
19. Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 2001;176:297-301
20. Stein SC, Spettell C, Young G, et al. Delayed and progressive brain injury in closed-head trauma: radiological demonstration. Neurosurgery 1993;32:25-30; discussion 30-31
21. Gaskill-Shipley MF, Tomsick TA. Angiography in the evaluation of head and neck trauma. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1996;6:607-24
22. Ozdoba C, Sturzenegger M, Schroth G. Internal carotid artery dissection: MR imaging features and clinical-radiologic correlation. Radiology 1996;199:191-98
23. Showalter W, Esekogwu V, Newton KI, et al. Vertebral artery dissection. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:991-95
24. Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B, et al. Prospective comparative study of intermediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. AJR 1988;150:673-82
25. Mittl RL, Grossman RI, Hiehle JF, et al. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1583-89
26. Kampfl A, Schmutzhard E, Franz G, et al. Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 1998;351:1763-67
27. Fiser SM, Johnson SB, Fortune JB. Resource utilization in traumatic brain injury: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Am Surg 1998;64:1088-93
28. Ashikaga R, Araki Y, Ishida O. MRI of head injury using FLAIR. Neuroradiology 1997;39:239-42
29. Gentry LR. Imaging of closed head injury. Radiology 1994;191:1-17
30. Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B. MR imaging of head trauma: review of the distribution and radiopathologic features of traumatic lesions. AJR 1988;150:663-72
31. Gentry LR, Thompson B, Godersky JC. Trauma to the corpus callosum: MR features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;9:1129-38
32. Arfanakis K, Haughton VM, Carew JD, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:794-802
33. Doezema D, King JN, Tandberg D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in minor head injury. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:1281-85
34. Rugg-Gunn FJ, Symms MR, Barker GJ, et al. Diffusion imaging shows abnormalities after blunt head trauma when conventional magnetic resonance imaging is normal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:530-33
35. Smith DH, Meaney DF, Lenkinski RE, et al. New magnetic resonance imaging techniques for the evaluation of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 1995;12:573-77
36. Wintermark M, Chiolero R, van Melle G, et al. Relationship between brain perfusion computed tomography variables and cerebral perfusion pressure in severe head trauma patients. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1579-87
37. Ichise M, Chung DG, Wang P, et al. Technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT, CT and MRI in the evaluation of patients with chronic traumatic brain injury: a correlation with neuropsychological performance. J Nucl Med 1994;35:217-26
38. Jacobs A, Put E, Ingels M, et al. Prospective evaluation of technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury. J Nucl Med 1994;35:942-47
39. Jantzen KJ, Anderson B, Steinberg FL, et al. A prospective functional MR imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury in college football players. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:738-45
40. Kinuya K, Kakuda K, Nobata K, et al. Role of brain perfusion single-photon emission tomography in traumatic head injury. Nucl Med Commun 2004;25: 333-37