Map and analysis of microsatellites in the genome of Populus: The first sequenced perennial plant

Science in China, Series C: Life Sciences

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 690-699

  Li, ShuXian ^a   Yin, TongMing ^a,b  

^a NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

GC content; Genic and nongenic regions; Length diversification; Microsatellite; Poplar genome

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASPEN; BIOLOGY; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; EXON; GENE; GENETICS; GENOME; INTRON; METABOLISM; PLANT; PLANT CHROMOSOME; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EXONS; GENES, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; INTRONS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYSICAL CHROMOSOME MAPPING; PLANTS; POPULUS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

POPULUS; TETRA;

EID: 34648836296     PISSN: 10069305     EISSN: 18622798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-007-0073-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wullschleger S D, Jansson S, Taylor G. Genomics and forest biology: Populus emerges as the perennial favortie. Plant Cell, 2002, 14: 2651-2655
2. Bradshaw H D, Ceulemans R, Davis J, et al. R. Emerging model systems in plant biology: Poplar (Populus) as a model torest tree. J Plant Growth Regul, 2000, 19: 306-313
3. Tuskan G A, DiFazio S P, Teichmann T. Poplar genomics is getting popular: The impact of the poplar genome project on tree research. Plant Biol, 2004, 6: 2-4
4. Brunner A M, Busov V B, Strauss S H. Poplar genome sequence: Functional genomics in an ecologically dominant plant species. Trends Plant Sci, 2004, 9: 49-56
5. Tuskan G A, DiFazio S P, Hellsten U, et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus Trichocarpa (Torr.& Gray Ex Brayshaw). Science, 2006, 313: 1596-1604
6. Schlotterer C. Genealogical inference of closely related species based on microsatellites. Genet Res Camb, 2001, 78: 209-212
7. Powell W, Machray G C, Provan J. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci, 1996, 1: 215-222
8. Jewell E, Robinson A, Savage D, et al. SSR primer and SSR taxonomy tree: Biome SSR discovery. Nucl Acids Res, 2006, 34: W656-W659
9. Tuskan G A, Gunter L E, Yang Z M, et al. Characterization of microsatellites revealed by genomci sequencing of Populus Trichocarpa. Can For Res, 2004, 34: 85-93
10. Wyman J, Bruneau A, Tremblay M F. Microsatellite analysis of gentic diversity in four populations of Populus tremuloides in Quebec. Can J Bot, 2003, 81: 367
11. Yin T M, Difazio S P, Gunter L E, et al. Large-scale heterospecific segregation distortion in Populus revealed by a Dense Genetic Map. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 451-463
12. Tautz D, Trick M, Dover G A. Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation. Nature, 1986, 322: 652-656
13. Kashi Y, King D, Soller M. Simple sequence repeats as a source of quantitative genetic variation. Trends Genet, 1997, 13: 74-78
14. Li Y C, Korol A B, Beiles A, et al. Microsatellites: Genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: A review. Mol Ecol, 2002, 11: 2453-2465
15. Dieringer D, Schlotterer C. Two distinct modes of microsatellite mutation processes: Evidence from the complete genomic sequences of nine species. Genome Res, 2003, 13: 2242-2251
16. Voorrips R E. MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Heredity, 2002, 93: 77-78
17. Smith E C. A study of cytology and speciation in the Genus Populus L. J Arnold Arb, 1943, 24: 275 305
18. Toth G, Gaspari Z, Jurka, J. Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: Survey and analysis. Genome Res, 2000, 10: 967-981
19. Hancock J M. Simple sequences in a 'minimal' genome. Nat Genet, 1996, 14: 14-15
20. Brinkmann B, Klintschar M, Neuhuber F, et al. Mutation rate in hu-man microsatellites: Influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. Am J Hum Genet, 1998, 62: 1408-1415
21. Brohede J, Primmer C R, Moller A, et al. Heterogeneity in the rate and pattern of germline mutation at individual microsatellite loci. Nucl Acids Res, 2002, 30: 1997-2003
22. n microsatellites. Nucleic Acids Res, 2003, 31: 974-980
23. Bachtrog D, Agis M, Imhof M, et al. Microsatellite variability differs between dinucleotide repeat motifs-Evidence from Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol, 2000, 17: 1277-1285
24. Hancock J M. The contribution of slippage-like processes to genome evolution. J Mol Evol, 1995, 41: 1038-1047
25. Reddy P S, Housman D E. The complex pathology of trinucleotide repeats. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1997, 9: 364-372
26. Lothe R A. Microsatellite instability in human solid tumors. Mol Med Today, 1997, 3: 61-68
27. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 2000, 408: 796-815
28. Goff S A, Ricke D, Lan T H, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza Sativa L. Ssp. Japonica). Science, 2002, 296: 92-100