The optimal structure for psychoanalytic education today: A feasible proposal?

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 953-984

  Wallerstein, Robert S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Faculty at the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis and Faculty at the Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34648834561     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00030651070550032201     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ARLOW, J.A. (1969). Myth and ritual in psychoanalytic training: Report of the first three-institute conference: Chicago, Pittsburgh, Topeka, pp. 104-120.
2. _ (1972). Some dilemmas in psychoanalytic education. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 20:556-566.
3. AUCHINCLOSS, E.L., & MICHELS, R. (2003). A reassessment of psychoanalytic education: Controversies and changes. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 84:387-403.
4. BALINT, M. (1948). On the psychoanalytic training system. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 29:163-173.
5. _ (1954). Analytic training and training analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 35:157-162.
6. BERNFELD, S. (1962). On psychoanalytic training. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 31:453-482.
7. BRUZZONE, M., CASAULA, E., JIMENEZ, J.P., & JORDAN, J.F. (1985). Regression and persecution in analytic training: Reflections on experience. International Review of Psychoanalysis 12:411-415.
8. CASEMENT, R (2005). The emperor's clothes: Some serious problems in psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86:1143-1160.
9. COOPER, A.M. (1984). Psychoanalysis at one hundred: Beginnings of maturity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 32:245-267.
10. ENGEL, G.L. (1968). Some obstacles to the development of research in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 16:195-204.
11. FONAGY, P., JONES, E., KÄCHELE, H., KRAUSE, R., CLARKIN, J.F., PERRON, R., GERBER, A., & ALLISON, E. (2002). An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis. Rev. ed. London: International Psychoanalytical Association.
12. _ KÄCHELE, H., KRAUSE, R., JONES, E., & PERRON, R. (1999). An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis. International Psychoanalytical Association.
13. FREUD, A. (1971). The ideal psychoanalytic institute: A utopia. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 35:225-239.
14. FREUD, S. (1919). On the teaching of psycho-analysis in universities. Standard Edition 17:171-173.
15. _ (1926). The question of lay analysis: Conversations with an impartial person. Standard Edition 20:183-250.
16. _ (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. Standard Edition 23:216-253.
17. GARZA-GUERRERO, C. (2004). Reorganisational and educational demands of psychoanalytic training today: Our long and marasmic night of one century. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85:3-13.
18. GOODMAN, S., ED. (1977). Psychoanalytic Education and Research: The Current Situation and Future Possibilities. New York: International Universities Press.
19. HOLZMAN, P.S. (1976). The future of psychoanalysis and its institutes. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 45:250-273.
20. _ (1985). Psychoanalysis: Is the therapy destroying the science? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 33:725-770.
21. KÄCHELE, H., & THOMÄ, H. (2000). On the devaluation of the Eitingon-Freud model of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81:806-808.
22. KAIRYS, D. (1964). The training analysis: A critical review of the literature and a controversial proposal. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 33:485-512.
23. KERNBERG, O.F. (1986). Institutional problems of psychoanalytic education. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 34:799-834.
24. _ (1992). Authoritarianism, culture, and personality in psychoanalytic education. Journal of the International Association for the History of Psychoanalysis 5:341-354.
25. _ (1996). Thirty methods to destroy the creativity of psychoanalytic candidates. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 77:1031-1040.
26. _ (1997). Resistances to research in psychoanalysis. In Contemporary Controversies in Psychoanalytic Theory, Techniques, and Their Applications. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004, pp. 86-93.
27. _ (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81:97-120.
28. _ (2002). Presidential address. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 83:197-203.
29. _ (2004a). Discussion: Problems of power in psychoanalytic institutions. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 24:106-121.
30. _ (2004b). Some proposed complementary solutions to the problems of psychoanalytic education. In Contemporary Controversies in Psychoanalytic Theory, Techniques, and their Applications. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 132-141.
31. _ (2006). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education: Part 1. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87:1649-1673.
32. _ (2007). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education: Part 2. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 88:183-202.
33. KERR, J. (2004). "The goody-goods are no good": Notes on power and authority in the early history of psychoanalysis, with special reference to training. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 24:7-30.
34. LIFSCHUTZ, J. E. (1976). A critique of reporting and assessment in the training analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 24:43-59.
35. LIPPMANN, W. (1966). The university. New Republic, May 28.
36. MEYER, L. (2003). Subservient analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 84:1241-1262.
37. SHAKOW, D. (1962). Psychoanalytic education of behavioral and social scientists for research. In Science and Psychoanalysis, ed. J.H. Masserman. Vol. 5. New York: Basic Books, pp. 146-161.
38. THOMÄ, H. (1993). Training analysis and psychoanalytic education: Proposals for reform. Annual of Psychoanalysis 21:3-75.
39. WALLERSTEIN, R.S. (1968). Discussion of George L. Engel: "Some obstacles to the development of research in psychoanalysis." Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 16:215-222.
40. _ (1972). The futures of psychoanalytic education. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 20:591-606.
41. _ (1974). Herbert S. Gaskill and the history of American psychoanalysis in American psychiatry. Denver Psychoanalytic Society Newsletter 1(3):1-9.
42. _ (1978). The mental health professions: Conceptualization and reconceptualization of a new discipline. International Review of Psychoanalysis 5:377-392.
43. _ (1980). Psychoanalysis and academic psychiatry - bridges. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 35:419-448.
44. _ (1983). The Topeka Institute and the future of psychoanalysis. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 47:497-518.
45. _ (1991). Psychoanalytic education and research: A transformative proposal. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 11:196-226.
46. _ (1993). Between chaos and petrification: A summary of the fifth IPA Conference of Training Analysts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 74:165-178.
47. _ & WEINSHEL, E.M. (1989). The future of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 58:341-373.