Development of a local MQ-DQ-based stencil adaptive method and its application to solve incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 367-386

  Shu, C ^a   Shan, Y Y ^a   Qin, N ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex geometry; Local MQ DQ method; Local stencil adaptive method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

CURVED BOUNDARY; MULTIQUADRIC-DIFFERENTIAL QUADRATURE METHOD; STENCIL ADAPTIVE METHOD;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 34648833664     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1467     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Miller K, Miller RN. Moving finite elements. I. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1981; 18:1019-1032.
2. Eiseman PR. Adaptive grid generation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1987; 64: 321-376.
3. Budd CJ, Carretero-Gonzalez R, Russell RD. Precise computations of chemotactic collapse using moving mesh methods. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 202:463-487.
4. Basebi T, Thomas RM. A study of moving mesh methods applied to a thin flame propagating in a detonator delay element. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 2003; 45:131-163.
5. Beckett G, Mackenzie JA, Ramage A, Sloan DM. Computational solution of two-dimensional unsteady PDEs using moving mesh methods. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 182:478-495.
6. Berger MJ, Oliger J. Adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 53:484-512.
7. Berger MJ, LeVeque R. Adaptive mesh refinement for two-dimensional hyperbolic systems and the AMRCLAW software. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1998; 35:2298-2316.
8. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ. The three R's engineering analysis and error estimation and adaptivity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1990; 82:95-113.
9. Ding H, Shu C. A stencil adaptive algorithm for finite difference solution of viscous incompressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 214:397-420.
10. Howell LH, Greenough JA. Radiation diffusion for multi-fluid Eulerian hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 184:53-78.
11. Hornung RD, Trangenstein JA. Adaptive mesh refinement and multilevel iteration for flow in porous media. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 136:522-545.
12. Anderson RW, Elliott NS, Pember RB. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method with adaptive mesh refinement for the solution of the Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 199:598-617.
13. Lucy LB. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astronomical Journal 1977; 8:1013-1024.
14. Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L. Element-free Galerkin methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1994; 37:229-256.
15. Liu W, Jun S, Zhang Y. Reproducing kernel particle methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1995; 20:1081-1106.
16. Babuska I, Melenk J. The partition of unity method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1997; 40:727-758.
17. Duarte CA, Oden JT. Hp clouds - a meshless method to solve boundary-value problems. TICAM Report 95-05.
18. Atluri SN, Zhu T. New meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics. Computational Mechanics 1998; 22:117-127.
19. Shu C, Ding H, Yeo KS. Local radial basis function-based differential quadrature method and its application to solve two-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2003; 192:941-954.
20. Moukalled F, Acharya S. Natural convection in the annulus between concentric horizontal circular and square cylinders. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 1996; 10:524-531.