Biaxial flexural modulus of antibiotic-impregnated orthopedic bone cement

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 97-104

  Leone, James ^a   Johnson, Amy ^b   Ziada, Samir ^b   Hashemi, Ata ^b   Adili, Anthony ^b,c   De Beer, Justin ^b,d  

^a Cambridge Memorial Hospital   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d HENDERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Antibiotic; Biaxial testing; Bone cement; Elastic modulus; Joint arthroplasty; PMMA

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTICS; BENDING STRENGTH; CHARACTERIZATION; ELASTIC MODULI; IMPREGNATION;

BIAXIAL TESTING; GENTAMICIN; JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; TOBRAMYCIN;

BONE CEMENT;

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BONE CEMENT; GENTAMICIN; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); TOBRAMYCIN; VANCOMYCIN;

ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; DRUG IMPLANT; DRUG SCREENING; MATERIALS TESTING; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; ELASTICITY; GENTAMICINS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOBRAMYCIN; VANCOMYCIN;

EID: 34648824848     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30771     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Joseph TN, Chen AL, Di Cesare PE. Use of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003;11:38-47.
2. Ger E, Dall D, Miles T, Forder A. Bone cements and antiobiotics. S Afr Med J 1977;51:276-279.
3. Nelson RC, Hoffman RO, Burton TA. Effect of antibiotic additions on the mechanical properties of acrylic cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1978;12:473-490.
4. Askew MJ, Kuel MF, Fleissner PR, Gradisar IA, Salstrom S, Tan JS. Effect of vacuum mixing on the mechanical properties of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:573-580.
5. He Y, Trotignon JP, Loty B, Tcharkhtchi A, Verdu J. Effects of antibiotics on the properties of poly(methylmethacrylate)-based bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:800-806.
6. Krause W, Mathis RS. Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: Review of the literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22(A1):37-53.
7. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;38:155-182.
8. Krause W, Grimes L, Mathis RS. Fatigue testing of acrylic bone cements: Statistical concepts and proposed test methodology. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22(A2):179-190.
9. Lewis G, Nyman JS. Toward standardization of methods of determination of fracture properties of acrylic bone cement and statistical analysis of test results. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:748-768.
10. Lee AJC, Ling RSM, Vangala SS. The mechanical properties of bone cements. J Med Eng Technol 1977;1:137-140.
11. Harper EJ, Bonfield W. Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:605-616.
12. Parks ML, Walsh HA, Salvati EA, Li S. Effect of increasing temperature on the properties of four bone cements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;335:238-248.
13. Lewis G. Relative roles of cement molecular weight and mixing method on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: Simplex P versus Osteopal. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:119-130.
14. Beaumont PWR, Young RJ. Slow crack growth in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1975;9:423-439.
15. Wagner HD, Cohn D. Use of high-performance polyethylene fibres as a reinforcing phase in poly(methylmethacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials 1989;10:139-141.
16. Lewis G. Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:143-149.
17. Johnson JA, Provan JW, Krygier JJ, Chan KH, Miller J. Fatigue of acrylic bone cement-effect of frequency and environment. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:819-831.
18. Freitag TA, Cannon SL. Fracture characteristics of acrylic bone cements. II. Fatigue. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;11:609-624.
19. Davies JP, Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Harris WH. Comparison of the fatigue characteristics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged Simplex P bone cement. J Orthop Res 1987;5:366-371.
20. Pittet C, Lemaitre J. Mechanical characterization of brushite cements: A mohr's circle approach. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:769-780.
21. Vila MM, Ginebra MP, Gil FJ, Planeli JA. Effect of porosity and environment on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cement modified with acrylontrile-butadiene styrene particles. II. Fatigue crack propagation. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:128-134.
22. Vila MM, Ginebra MP, Gil FJ, Planeli JA. Effect of porosity and environment on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cement modified with acrylonitrile-butadiene styrene particles. I. Fracture toughness. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:121-127.
23. Kim HY, Yasuda HK. Improvement of fatigue properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cement by means of plasma surface treatment of fillers. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:135-142.
24. Heck D, Rosenberg A, Schink-Ascani M, Garbus S, Kiewett T. Use of antibiotic-impregnated cement during hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:470-475.
25. Higgs WAJ, Luchsanasombool P, Higgs RJED, Swain MV. A simple method of determining the modulus of orthopedic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:188-195.
26. Kirstein AF, Woolley RM. Symmetrical bending of thin circular elastic plates on equally spaced point supports. J Res Nat Bur Stand 1967;71C:1-10.
27. Wachtman JB, Capps W, Mandel J. Biaxial flexure tests of ceramic substrates. J Mater Sci 1972;7:188-194.
28. Garvin KL, Hinrichs SH, Urban JA. Emerging antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Their treatment in total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;369:110-123.
29. Hanssen AD, Osmon DR. The use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents during and after hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;369:124-138.