Effectiveness of rotary and hand files in gutta-percha and sealer removal using chloroform or chlorhexidine gel

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 139-143

  Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Da Silveira ^a,b   Delboni, Maraisa Greggio ^b   De Araújo, Roberta Aranha ^b   Carrara, Hilton José ^b   Cunha, Rodrigo Sanches ^b  

^a PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Endodontic retreatment; Nickel titanium K3 rotary files; Solvents

Indexed keywords

CHLORHEXIDINE; CHLOROFORM; GUTTA PERCHA; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SOLVENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; RETREATMENT; ROTATION;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CHLORHEXIDINE; CHLOROFORM; GUTTA-PERCHA; RETREATMENT; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; ROTATION; SOLVENTS;

EID: 34648815823     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 18064760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402006000200011     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allen RK, Newton CW, Brown CE. A statistical analysis of surgical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatment cases. J Endod 1989;15:261-266.
2. Lin LM, Skribner JE, Gaengler P. Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures. J Endod 1992;18:625-627.
3. Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tanse A. Endodontic retreatment - Case selection and technique. Part 3: Retreatment techniques. J Endod 1990;16:543-549.
4. Sae-Lim V, Rajamanickam I, Lim BK, Lee HL. Effectiveness of ProFile.04 taper rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J 2000;26:100-104.
5. Ferreira JJ, Rhode JS, Pitt Ford TR. The efficacy of guttapercha removal using ProFiles Int Endod J 2001;34:267-274.
6. Barrieshi-Nusair KM. Gutta-percha retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand files, J Endod 2002;28:454-456.
7. Oyama KO, Siqueira EL, Santos M. In vitro study of effect of solvent on root canal retreatment. Braz Dent J 2002;13:208-211.
8. Barbosa SV, Burkard DH, Spängberg LSW. Cytotoxic effects of gutta-percha solvents. J Endod 1994;20:6-8.
9. Ferraz CCR, Gomes BPFA, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the antimicrobial action and the mechanical ability of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod 2001;27:452-455.
10. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994,20:276-278.
11. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod 1997;23:229-231.
12. Bharathi G, Chacko Y, Lakshminarayanan L. An in vitro analysis of gutta-percha removal using three different techniques. Endodontol 2002;14:41-45.
13. Berber VB, Gomes BPFA, Sena NT, Vianna CCR, Ferraz CCR, Zaia AA, Souza-Filho FJ. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 2006;39:10-17.
14. Betti LV, Bramante CM. Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2001;34:514-519.
15. Wilcox LR, Krell KV, Madison S, Rittman B. Endodontic retreatment: evaluation of gutta-percha and sealer removal and canal reinstrumentation. J Endod 1987;13,453-457.
16. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata G-I, Uemura M, Toda T, Weine F. A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J 2000;33:361-366.
17. Hulsmann M, Stotz S. Efficiency, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 1997;30:227-233.
18. Masiero AV, Barletta FB. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int Endod J 2005;38:2-7.