Accommodative response in pre-presbyopes with visual impairment and its clinical implications

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 3888-3896

  Leat, Susan J ^a   Mohr, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b AALEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NYSTAGMUS; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINOSCOPY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ONSET AGE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGE OF ONSET; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; NYSTAGMUS, PATHOLOGIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRESBYOPIA; PREVALENCE; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINOSCOPY; RISK FACTORS; VISION, LOW;

EID: 34648813888     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0582     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Elliott DB, Flanagan J. Clinical Procedures in Primary Eye Care. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003;138-140.
2. Leat SJ. Management of pediatric low-vision patients. Pract Optom. 2003;14:6-11.
3. Dickinson C. Low Vision: Principles and Practice. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998:270.
4. Lindstedt E. Accommodation in the visually impaired child. Low Vision: Principles and Applications: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Low Vision, University of Waterloo, June 25-27, 1986. Woo GCS, ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987.
5. Leat SJ, Shute RH, Westall CA. Assessing Children's Vision: A Handbook. Boston; Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999:154.
6. White JM, Wick B. Accommodation in humans with juvenile macular degeneration. Vision Res. 1995;35:873-880.
7. Heath GG. Accommodative responses of totally color blind observers. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1956;33:457-465.
8. Heath GG. The influence of visual acuity on accommodative responses of the eye. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1956;33:513-524.
9. Hokoda SC, Ciuffreda KJ. Measurement of accommodative amplitude in amblyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1982;2:205-212.
10. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ, Semmlow JL, Hokoda SC. Model of static accommodative behavior in human amblyopia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1983;30:665-672.
11. Ong E, Ciuffreda KJ, Tannen B. Static accommodation in congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:194-204.
12. Ciuffreda KJ. The Glenn A Fry invited lecture accommodation to gratings and more naturalistic stimuli. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:243-260.
13. Charman WN. Visual Optics and Instrumentation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1991.
14. McClelland JF, Saunders KJ. The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23:243-250.
15. Garcia A, Cacho P. MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy in patients with disorders of vergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:214-220.
16. Woodhouse JM, Meades JS, Leat SJ, Saunders KJ. Reduced accommodation in children with down syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2382-2387.
17. Woodhouse JM, Pakeman VH, Saunders KJ, et al. Visual acuity and accommodation in infants and young children with down's syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1996;40:49-55.
18. Leat SJ. Reduced accommodation in children with cerebral palsy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:385-390.
19. McClelland JF, Parkes J, Hill N, Jackson AJ, Saunders KJ. Accommodative dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: a population-based study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1824-1830.
20. Leat SJ, Gargon JL. Accommodative response in children and young adults using dynamic retinoscopy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:375-384.
21. McClelland JF, Saunders KJ. Accommodative lag using dynamic retinoscopy: age norms for school-age children. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:929-933.
22. Locke LC, Somers W. A comparison study of dynamic retinoscopy techniques. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:540-544.
23. Nott IS. Dynamic skiametry, accommodation and convergence. Am J Physiol Opt. 1925;6:490-503.
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
25. Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held R. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children. Vision Res. 1995;35:1299-1304.
26. Smith G. Refraction and visual acuity measurements: what are their measurement uncertainties? Clin Exp Optom. 2006;89:66-72.
27. Ciuffreda KJ, Hokoda SC. Spatial frequency dependence of accommodative responses in amblyopic eyes. Vision Res. 1983;23:1585-1594.
28. Green DG, Powers MK, Banks MS. Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity. Vision Res. 1980;20:827-835.
29. Ciuffreda KJ, Rumpf D. Contrast and accommodation in amblyopia. Vision Res. 1985;25:1445-1457.
30. Ciuffreda KJ, Hokoda SC, Hung GK, Semmlow JL, Selenow A. Staticaspects of accommodation in human amblyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983;60:436-449.
31. Nowakowski RW. Primary Low Vision Care. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange 1994;319.