Development and validation of a Medicaid Postpartum Tubal Sterilization Knowledge Questionnaire

Contraception

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 287-291

  Zite, Nikki B ^a   Wallace, Lorraine S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Consent; Knowledge; Literacy; Medicaid; Sterilization; Tubal ligation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAID; NORMAL HUMAN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION;

FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAID; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRES; STERILIZATION, TUBAL;

EID: 34548839372     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Borrero S., Schwartz E.B., Reeves M.F., Bost J.E., Creinin M.D., and Ibrahim S.A. Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 109 (2007) 94-100
2. DeStefano F., Greenspan J.R., Ory H.W., Peterson H.B., Maze J.M., and Smith J.C. Demographic trends in tubal sterilization: United States, 1970-1978. Am J Public Health 72 (1982) 480-484
3. MacKay A.P., Kieke B.A., Koonin L.M., and Beattie K. Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996. Fam Plann Perspect 33 (2001) 161-165
4. Eliot JW. Fertility control and coercion. Fam Plann Perspect 1973;5:132, 187.
5. Stern A.M. Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California. Am J Public Health 95 (2005) 1128-1138
6. Chandra A. Surgical sterilization in the United States: prevalence and characteristics, 1965-1995. Advance data from vital and health statistics; Series 23: No. 20 (1998), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville (Md)
7. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 45 Code of Federal Regulations 205.35; 1976.
8. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 42 Code of Federal Regulations 441.257; 1976.
9. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 42 Code of Federal Regulations 441.253; 1978.
10. Zite N., Wueller S., and Gilliam M. Failure to obtain a desired postpartum sterilization: risks and predictors. Obstet Gynecol 105 (2005) 794-799
11. Zite N., Wueller S., and Gilliam M. Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization. Contraception 73 (2006) 404-407
12. Schmidt J.E., Hillis S.D., Marchbanks P.A., Geng G., and Peterson H.B. Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Fertil Steril 74 (2000) 892-898
13. Moseman C.P., Robinson R.D., Bates G.W., and Propst A.M. Identifying women who will request sterilization reversal in a military population. Contraception 73 (2006) 512-515
14. Curtis K.M., Mohllajee A.P., and Peterson H.B. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 73 (2006) 205-210
15. Ailinger R.L., Harper D.C., and Lasus H.A. Bone up on osteoporosis: development of the facts on osteoporosis quiz. Orthop Nurs 5 (1998) 66-73
16. Ailinger R.L., Lasus H., and Braun M.A. Revision of the facts on osteoporosis quiz. Nurs Res 52 (2003) 198-201
17. Allen R.M., and Jones M.P. The validity and reliability of an asthma knowledge questionnaire used in the evaluation of a group of asthma education self-management program for adults with asthma. J Asthma 35 (1998) 537-545
18. Zoella M.M., Brodeur M.R., Dominelli A., Haines S.T., and Allie N.D. Development and validation of an instrument to determine patient knowledge: the oral anticoagulation knowledge test. Ann Pharmacother 40 (2006) 633-638
19. Payne J. Researching health needs (1999), Sage Publications, London 25-36
20. Brockopp D.Y., and Hastings-Tolsma M.T. Fundamentals of nursing research. 3rd ed. (2003), Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury (Mass) 193-220
21. McKenzie J.F., Wood M.L., Kotecki J.E., et al. Establishing content validity: using qualitative and quantitative steps. Ann Fam Med 23 (1999) 311-318
22. Muijtjens A.M., vanMameren H., Hoogenboom R.J., Evers J.L., and vanderVleuten C.R. The effects of a "don't know" option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared. Med Educ 33 (1999) 267-275
23. Veneziano L., and Hooper J. A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. Am J Health Behav 21 (1997) 67-70
24. Lawsche C.H. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 28 (1975) 563-575
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Available at:. www.cdc.gov/brfss [Accessed January 27, 2007]
26. Davis T.C., Long S.W., Jackson R.H., et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med 25 (1993) 391-395
27. Bass P.F., Wilson J.F., Griffith C.H., and Barnett D.R. Residents' ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills. Acad Med 77 (2002) 1039-1041
28. University of Memphis. Readability formulas. Available at:. http://csep.psyc.memphis.edu/cohmetrix/readabilityresearch.htm [Accessed January 27, 2007]
29. Weiss B.D. Health literacy: a manual for clinicians (2003), American Medical Association Foundation, Chicago (Ill)
30. Institute of Medicine. In: Nielsen-Bohlman L., Panzer A., and Kindig D.A. (Eds). Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion (2004), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 59-107
31. Weiss B.D. Epidemiology of low health literacy. In: Schwartzberg J.G., VanGest J.B., and Wang C.C. (Eds). Understanding health literacy (2005), American Medical Association, Chicago (Ill) 17-39
32. Zite N.B., Philipson S.J., and Wallace L.S. Consent to sterilization section of the Medicaid-Title XIX form: is it understandable?. Contraception 75 (2007) 256-260