Prevention of oil spill from shipping by modelling of dynamic risk

Marine Pollution Bulletin

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1619-1633

  Eide, Magnus S ^a   Endresen, Øyvind ^a   Breivik, Øyvind ^b   Brude, Odd Willy ^a   Ellingsen, Ingrid H ^c   Røang, Kjell ^d   Hauge, Jarle ^e   Brett, Per Olaf ^a  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^c SINTEF   (Norway)

^d CHRISTIAN MICHELSEN RESEARCH AS   (Norway)

^e Norwegian Coastal Administration   (Norway)

Author keywords

Decision support; Drift grounding; Dynamic risk; Oil spill; Prevention; Prioritisation

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DYNAMIC MODELS; OCEAN CURRENTS; OIL TANKERS; SHIPS; TUGBOATS;

DRIFT GROUNDING ACCIDENTS; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MODEL; REAL TIME RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIP TRAFFIC PRIORITISATION;

OIL SPILLS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; OIL SPILL; PRIORITIZATION;

ARTICLE; OIL SPILL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIPPING; WATER POLLUTION;

ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OCEANS AND SEAS; PETROLEUM; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIPS; TIME FACTORS; WATER MOVEMENTS; WIND;

EID: 34548822688     PISSN: 0025326X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), 1998. AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues. Oslo, Norway. Xii + 859 pp.
2. Andreassen, E., Dugstad, G., Hovem, L., Kjeøy, H., Torhaug, R., 2003. DNV - using risk principles in setting and enforcing safety regulations. DNV Paper No. 2003-P010. Høvik, Norway.
3. Behrens, H.L., Endresen, Ø., Mjelde, A., Garmann, C., 2003. Environmental Accounting System for Norwegian Shipping - EASNoS Phase 1. DNV Rep. No. 2002-1645. Høvik, Norway.
4. Bonn Agreement, 2006. The Bonn Agreement Counter Pollution Manual, Chapter 28 "Emergency Towing - Guidelines to contracting parties". http://www.bonnagreement.org/eng/doc/Chapter28%20-%20Emergency%20towing.pdf.
5. Breivik, Ø., Allen, A., 2007. An operational search and rescue model for the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea. J Marine Sys, in press, doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.02.010.
6. Brunstad, B., Magnus, E., Swanson, P., Hønneland, G., Øverland, I., 2004. Big oil, playground, Russian bear preserve or European periphery? The Russian Barents sea region towards 2015. Eburon Delft 2004. ISBN 90 5972 039 3.
7. Degré, T., Glansdorp, C., Tak, C. van der., 2003. The importance of a risk based index for vessels to enhance maritime safety. In: Proceedings of the 10th IFAC Symposium on Control in transportation Systems. Tokyo, Japan.
8. Danish Maritime Authority and Royal Danish Administration of Navigation and Hydrography (DMA& RDANH), 2002. Risk Analysis of Navigational Safety in Danish Waters. Danish Maritime Authority and Royal Danish Administration of Navigation and Hydrography. Report No. P-054380-2, 2002. http://soefart.inforce.dk/graphics/Synkron-Library/Sofartsstyrelsen/Publikationer/Summary1.pdf.
9. Dragos, R., 2003. Protection of Bunker Tanks. INTERTANKO paper at The 24th International Bunker Conference, Rotterdam. 9th May 2003. http://www.intertanko.com/pubupload/BunkerTanksProtect.pdf.
10. Eide, M., Endresen, Ø., Ervik, J.L., Brett, P.O., Røang, K., 2006a. Intelligent ship traffic monitoring for oil spill prevention: risk based decision support building on AIS. Marine Pollution Bulletin (2006). doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.11.004.
11. Eide, M., Endresen, Ø., Soma, T., Brett, P.O., 2006b. Risk Based Ship Prioritization. DNV Report No. 2006-0435. Høvik, Norway.
12. Engedahl, H., 1995. Implementation of the Princeton Ocean Model (POM/ECOM3D) at The Norwegian Meteorological Institute (DNMI). Research Report 5, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway.
13. Engedahl, H., 2001. Operational Ocean Models at Norwegian Meteorological Institute (DNMI). Research Note 59, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway.
14. European Union, 2001. EU Directive 2001/106/EC. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/l_019/l_01920020122en00170031.pdf.
15. European Union, 2002. EU Directive 2002/59/EC. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/l_208/l_20820020805en00100027.pdf.
16. Fowler T.G., and Sørgård E. Modelling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis 20 2 (2000) 2000
17. Hackett B., Breivik Ø., and Wettre C. Forecasting the drift of objects and substances in the oceans. In: Chassignet E.P., and Verron J. (Eds). Ocean Weather Forecasting: An Integrated View of Oceanography (2006), Springer 507-524
18. Hansson, L.H., Kiær, E., 1997. Technical Failures System Criticality Ranking. SAFECO WP II.6, Report No. 233509.00.01.
19. Harrald, J.R., Mazzuchi, T.A., Merrick, J., Spahn, J., Van Dorp, R., 1997. System simulation: a risk management tool for Prince William Sound. In: Proceedings of 1997 International Oil Spill Conference.
20. Haug, O., Guddal, J., 1981. Hindcasting the Wind and Wave Climate of Norwegian Waters, the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, project report.
21. Herman, B., 1995. Screening for acceptable risk. Washington's oil spill prevention agency.
22. International Chamber of Shipping/International Shipping Federation, 2006. Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table. www.marisec.org/flag-performance.
23. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), 2002a. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). http://www.imo.org/Conventions/contents.asp?topic_id=257&doc_id=647#9.
24. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), 2002b. AIS-topic webpage: http://www.imo.org/Safety/mainframe.asp?topic_id=754, accessed September 2006.
25. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), 2004. Resolution A.949(23) "Guidelines on places of refuge for ship in need of assistance". http://www.imo.org/includes/blastDataOnly.asp/data_id%3D9042/949.pdf.
26. International Maritime Organisation (IMO), 2006. Measures to Enhance Maritime Security, Long range Identification and tracking of ships, MSC81/WP.5/Add.1, 18 May.
27. International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (ITOPF), 2005. ITOPF Technical Information Paper: Fate of Marine Oil Spills. http://www.itopf.com/tip2.pdf.
28. International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (ITOPF), 2004. Oil Tanker spill statistics. www.itopf.com/stats.html.
29. Kjellstrøm, S., Johansen, C.B., 2004. FSA Generic Vessel Risk - Double hull tanker for oil. DNV Report No. 2003-0425. Høvik, Norway.
30. Lehmann, M.P., Sørgård, E., 2000. Consequence Model for Ship Accidents. ESREL 2000, SARS and SRA-Europe Annual Conference, 17 May 2000, Edinburgh, UK.
31. LRF (Lloyds Register Fairplay), 2005a. The World fleet database for 2004 (all civil ocean-going ships above or equal to 100 GT). Provided by Lloyds', UK.
32. LRF (Lloyds Register Fairplay) 2005b. The World Fleet of oil tankers, 1998-2004. Provided by Lloyds', UK.
33. LRF (Lloyds Register Fairplay) 2006. The World fleet database for 1990-2006 (all civil ocean-going ships above or equal to 100 GT). Provided by Lloyds', UK.
34. Martinsen, E.A., Engedahl, H., Ottersen, G., Ådlandsvik, B., Loeng, H., Balino, B., 1992. Climatological and hydrographical data for hindcast of ocean currents. Technical Report No. 100. The Norwegian Meteorologcal Institute.
35. Martinsen, E.A., Melsom, A., Sveen, V., Grong, E., Reistad, M., Halvorsen, N., Johansen, Ø., Skognes, K., 1994. The operational oil drift system at DNMI. DNMI Technical Report, No. 125, Oslo, 1994.
36. Mears C.A., Smith D.K., and Wentz F.J. Comparison of SSM/I and bouy-measured wind speeds from 1987 to 1997. Journal of Geophysical Research 106 C6 (2001) 11719-11729
37. Meissner, T., Smith, D., Wentz, F., 2001. A ten year intercomparison between collocated SSM/I oceanic surface wind speed retrievals and global analyses. Remote Sensing Systems paper available at: http://www.ssmi.com/papers/ocean_surface.pdf.
38. Moe, K.A., Anker-Nilssen, T., Bakken, V., Brude, O.W., Fossum, P., Lorentsen, S.H., Skeie, G.M., 1999. Spesielt Miljøfølsomme Områder (SMO) og petroleumsvirksomhet. Implementering av kriterier for identifikasjon av SMO i norske farvann med fokus på akutt oljeforurensning. Alpha Miljørådgivning rapport nr. 1007-1 (51 s.) (In Norwegian).
39. Moe, K.A., Brude, O.W., Garsfjord, G., Dahle, E.Aa., Johansen, Ø., Skognes, K., 2004. Skipstrafikk i Området Lofoten-Barentshavet- Miljørisiko ved Uhellshendelser. Alpha Miljørådgivning rapport nr. 1075-01 (61 s.). (In Norwegian).
40. National Academy Press, 1998. Double-hull Tanker Legislation, An assessment of the oil pollution Act of 1990. Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council, Washington, DC. http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309063701/html/124.html.
41. ParisMOU, 2006. Target Factor Calculator. http://www.parismou.org/ParisMOU/Target+Factor/xp/menu.3980/default.aspx.
42. Reistad, M., Iden, K., 1998. Updating, correction and evaluation of a hindcast data base of air pressure, wind and waves for the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea and the Barents sea. Norwegian Meteorological Institute Research Report No. 9 1998.
43. SFT & DN 1996/2001. Emergency preparedness for acute pollution. A method of prioritising environmental resources in the event of acute pollution on the coast." (In Norwegian with English summary only). Statens Forureningstilsyn (SFT) og Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning (DN). Report TA-number 1765/2000.
44. Skinner, D.C., 2001. Introduction to Decision Analysis. Second edition. Probabilistic Publishing, USA. ISBN 0-9647938-3-0.
45. Skjong, R., Vanem, E., Endresen, Ø., 2005. Risk Evaluation Criteria. Ongoing EU project SAFEDOR Deliverable 4.5.2. www.safedor.org.
46. Slagstad D., and McClimans T.A. Modeling the ecosystem dynamics of the Barents sea including the marginal ice zone: I Physical and chemical oceanography. Journal of Marine Systems 58 (2005) 1-18
47. Soma, T., 2005. Blue-chip or Sub-standard. Doctoral thesis. The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
48. Sætre, Ø., Wettre, C., 1999. Simulations of the Braer drift. ISSN 0332-9879, rapport no. 78. Oslo, Norway.
49. Sørgård, E., Vada, T., 1998. Observations and modelling of drifting ships, Det Norske Veritas report no 96-2011, 64 pp, Høvik Norway.
50. Sørgård, E., 1993. Oil drift simulations. Technical Report 93-2060, Det Norske Veritas Research, Høvik, Norway.
51. Sørgård el al., 1999. Data on consequences following ship accidents. SAFECO II WP III.3, D22B. DNV Rep. No. 99-2031. Høvik, Norway.
52. The Glosten Associates, 2004. Study of Tug Escorts in Puget Sound. Prepared for State of Washington, Department of Ecology, Lacey, Washington.
53. The Norwegian Coastal Administration, 2005. SafeSeaNet Information. http://www.kystverket.no/default.aspx?aid=9030959 (In Norwegian).
54. The Norwegian Coastal Administration, 2006a. Transport av risikolast langs norskekysten. http://www.kystverket.no/?did=9140380 (In Norwegian).
55. The Norwegian Coastal Administration, 2006b. Nasjonal slepeberedskap. Rapport fra arbeidsgruppe. http://www.kystverket.no/?did=9282756 (In Norwegian).
56. Thevik, H.J., Sørgård, E., Fowler, T., 2001. A method for assessing the risk of sea transportation: numerical examples for the Oslofjord. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2001.
57. UK Department for Environment, 2000. The MEHRA-project, Identification of Marine Environmental High Risk Areas (MEHRAs) in the UK. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/consult/mehra/.
58. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2005. Review of Maritime Transport 2005. www.unctad.org/Templates/webflyer.asp?docid=6486&intItemID=3588&lang=1&mode=toc.
59. United States Coast Guard (USCG), 1998. Oil outflow analysis for a series of double hull tankers. Prepared by: Herbert Engineering Corp. Report No. 9749-1 Rev. A 1998. http://www.herbert.com/publications/pdf/r9749-2.PDF.
60. United States Coast Guard (USCG), 2006. U.S.C.G Guard's Boarding Priority Matrix. http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g%2Dm/pscweb/Boarding%20Matrix.htm.
61. Wijnolst, N., Wergeland, T., 1997. Shipping. Delft University Press, ISBN 90-407-1380-4.
62. Young I.R., and Holland G.J. Atlas of the Oceans Wind and Wave Climate (2006), Pergamont