Comparison of orbital volumes in enucleated patients with unilateral retinoblastoma: Hydroxyapatite implants versus silicone implants

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 393-396

  Lyle, Cari E ^a   Wilson, Matthew W ^a,b,c   Li, Chin Shang ^b   Kaste, Sue C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b ST JUDE CHILDREN S RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Hamilton Eye Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE; SILICONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ENUCLEATION; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORBIT; ORBIT IMPLANT; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; RETINOBLASTOMA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SILICONE PROSTHESIS;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DURAPATITE; EYE ENUCLEATION; HUMANS; INFANT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORBIT; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RETINAL NEOPLASMS; RETINOBLASTOMA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34548819340     PISSN: 07409303     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181462ca8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pfeiffer RL. The effect of enucleation on the orbit. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol 1945;49:236-43.
2. Kennedy RE. The effect of early enucleation on the orbit; in animals and humans. Am J Ophthalmol 1965;60:277-306.
3. Mules PH. Evisceration of the globe, with artificial vitreous. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1885;5:200.
4. Sarnat BG, Shanedling PD. Orbital growth after evisceration or enucleation without and with implants. Acta Anat 1972;82:497-511.
5. Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:274-80.
6. Beard C. Remarks on historical and newer approaches to orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;11:89-90.
7. Cepela M, Teske S. Orbital implants. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1996;7:38-42.
8. Custer PL. Enucleation: past, present, and future. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;16:316-21.
9. Moshfeghi DM, Moshfeghi AA, Finger PT. Enucleation. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:277-30.
10. Jordan DR. Anophthalmic orbital implants. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2000;13:587-608.
11. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Bawazeer A. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:458-60.
12. Mittal R, Thomas R, Naik M, Honavar SG. Re: "The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases." Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 20:403-4.
13. Jordanidou V, De Potter P. Porous polyethylene orbital implant in the pediatric population. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:425-9.
14. Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, et al. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal PlastReconstr Surg 2003;19:364-71.
15. Cheng MS, Liao SL, Lin LL. Late porous polyethylene exposure after motility coupling post placement. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:420-4.
16. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM, Fornoff J. Comparative motility of hydroxyapatite and alloplastic enucleation implants. Ophthalmology 1999;106:513-6.
17. Colen TP, Paridaens DA, Lemij HG, et al. Comparison of artificial eye amplitudes with acrylic and hydroxyapatite spherical enucleation implants. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1889-94.
18. Custer PL, Kennedy RH, Woog JJ, et al. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2054-61.
19. Chen D, Heher K. Management of the anopthalmic socket in pediatric patients. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:449-53.
20. Mazzoli RA, Raymond WR, Ainbinder DJ, Hansen EA. Use of self-expanding, hydrophilic osmotic expanders (hydrogel) in the reconstruction of congenital clinical anophthalmos. Curr Opin Ophthal 2004;15:426-31.