The influence of errors in Digital Terrain Models on flood flow routes

Proceedings of the International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics - River Flow 2006

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1955-1962

  Neelz S ^a   Pender, G ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING; ARTIFICIAL ROUGHNESS; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; FLOOD EVENT; FLOOD FLOW; FLOOD-PLAINS; FLOW DYNAMICS; HIGH RESOLUTION; HIGH-ACCURACY; HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL; LIDAR MEASUREMENTS; MODEL RESULTS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; URBAN RIVER;

ERRORS; FLOOD CONTROL; HYDRAULICS; RIVERS; STREAM FLOW; SURVEYING; WATER LEVELS;

OPTICAL RADAR;

EID: 34548818520     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Ahokas E., Kaartinen H. & Hyyppä J. 2003. A quality assessment of airborne laser scanner data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Vol. XXXIV 3/W13.
2. Aronica G., Hankin B. and Beven K.J. 1998. Uncertainty and equifinaly in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data. Advances in Water Resources 22: 349-365.
3. Bates P.D. and De Roo, A.P.J. 2000. A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology 236: 54-77.
4. Chow, V.T. 1998. Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Education.
5. Cobby, D.M., Mason D.C., Horritt M.S. & Bates P.D. 2003. Two-dimensional hydraulic flood modelling using a finite-element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes 17(10): 1979-2000.
6. Gomes Pereira L.M. & Wicherson R.J. 1999. Suitability of laser data for deriving geographical information. A case study in the context of management of fluvial zones. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 54: 105-114.
7. Hodgson M.E. & Bresnahan P. 2004. Accuracy of airborne LiDAR-derived elevation: empirical assessment and error budget. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70(3): 331-339.
8. Marks K. & Bates P.D. 2000. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes 14(11): 2109-2122.
9. Mason D.C., Cobby D.M., Horritt M.S. & Bates P.D. 2003. Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hvdrological Processes 17(9): 1711-1732.
10. North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program 2006. Internet address: http://www.ncfloodmaps.com. Last accessed February 2006.
11. Sithole G. & Vosselman G. 2004. Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 59: 85-101.
12. Stelling G.S. 1984. On the Construction of Computational Methods for Shallow Water Flow Problems. Rijkswaterstaat Communications, No 35/1984. The Hague, Netherlands.