Assessing biology information in today's world: Are our students capable?

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 390-392

  MacKenzie, Ann Haley ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548818183     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[390:ABIITW]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2002). Sound science for an endangered species. In Science and Technology in Congress. Retrieved July 21, 2007. http://www.aaas. org/spp/cstc/pne/ pubs/stc/stc02-09.pdf.
2. Barnes, D.E. & Bero, L.A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2791, 1566-1570.
3. Miller, J.D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273-294.
4. Mooney, C. (2005). The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books.
5. National Science Foundation. (2006). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. In NSF Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Retrieved July 25, 2007. http://www. nsf.gov/statistics/sein06/c7/ c7h.htm.
6. Rampton, S. & Stauber, J. (2000). How big tobacco helped create the junkman. In PR Watch.org. Retrieved July 24, 2007. http://www.prwatch. org/prwissues/2000Q3/junkman.html.