Can we still perform instrumental rotations using Thierry's spatula? Preliminary study among primiparous;Peut-on encore réaliser des rotations instrumentales par spatules de Thierry ? Étude préliminaire chez la primipare

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 582-587

  Parant, O ^a   Simon, C ^a   Capdet, J ^a   Tanguy Le Gac, Y ^a   Reme, J M ^a  

^a TOULOUSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Instrumental extraction; Perineal tear; Persistent occiput posterior position; Thierry's spatulas

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NEWBORN CARE; PERINEAL CARE; PERINEUM INJURY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIMIPARA; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 34548808019     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Neri A., Kaplan B., Rabinerson D., Sulkes J., and Ovadia J. The management of persistent occipitoposterior position. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 22 (1995) 126-131
2. Phillips R.D., and Freeman M. The management of the persistent occiput posterior position. A review of 552 consecutive cases. Obstet. Gynecol. 43 (1974) 171-177
3. Pearl M.L., Roberts J.M., Laros R.K., and Hurd W.W. Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. J. Reprod. Med. 38 (1993) 955-961
4. Cheng Y.W., Shaffer B.L., and Caughey A.B. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 107 (2006) 837-844
5. Healy D.L., and Laufe L.E. Survey of forceps training in North America in 1981. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 151 (1985) 54-58
6. Hagadorn-Freathy A.S., Yeomans E.R., and Hankins G.D.V. Validation of the 1988 ACOG forceps classification system. Obstet. Gynecol. 77 (1991) 356-360
7. Williams M.C., Knuppel R.A., O'Brien W.F., Weiss A., and Kanarek K.S. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup. Obstet. Gynecol. 78 (1991) 789-794
8. Ramin S.M., Little B.B., and Gilstrap L.C. Survey of forceps delivery in North America in 1990. Obstet. Gynecol. 81 (1993) 307-311
9. Tan K.H., Sim R., and Yam K.L. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?. Singapore Med. J. 33 (1992) 380-382
10. Jain V., Guleria K., Gopalan S., and Narang A. Mode of delivery in deep transverse arrest. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 43 (1993) 129-135
11. Menticoglou S.M., Perlman M., and Manning F.A. High cervical spinal cord injury in neonates delivered with forceps: report of 15 cases. Obstet. Gynecol. 86 (1995) 589-597
12. Mills J.F., Dargaville P.A., Coleman L.T., Rosenfeld J.V., and Ekert P.G. Upper cervical spinal cord injury in neonates: the use of magnetic resonance imaging. J. Pediatr. 138 (2001) 105-108
13. Guyomar J. Valeur obstétricale des spatules de Thierry. Résultats de 1000 applications. Rev. Fr. Gynecol. Obstet. 12 (1965) 775-782
14. Maisonnette-Escot Y., Riethmuller D., Chevrière S., Becher P., Floret N., Zurlinden B., et al. Thierry's spatula instrumental extraction: a study of fetal-maternal morbidity. Gynecol Obstet. Fertil. 33 (2005) 208-212
15. Fournié A, Parant O. Spatules de Thierry. Encycl Med. Chir (Elsevier SAS, Paris), Obstétrique, 5-095-A-10, 2003, 4p.
16. Fournié A., and Parant O. Techniques d'application des spatules de Thierry. Techniques chirurgicales et obstétricales (1999), Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (Cassette VIII)
17. ACOG Technical bulletin. Operative vaginal delivery. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 47 (1994) 179-185
18. Magnin P., and Audra P.H. Est-il légitime de faire aujourd'hui des grandes rotations aux forceps ?. Rev. Fr. Gynecol. Obstet. 7 (1984) 255-261
19. Hankins G.D., Leicht T., Van Hook J., and Uckan E.M. The role of forceps rotation in maternal and neonatal injury. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 180 (1999) 231-234
20. Riethmuller D., Teffaud O., Eyraud J.L., Sautière J.L., Schaal J.P., and Maillet R. Maternal and fetal prognosis of occipitoposterior presentation. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. 28 (1999) 41-47
21. Riethmuller D., Schaal J.P., and Maillet R. Ventouse obstétricale : un instrument moderne. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 29 (2001) 648-662
22. Greis J.B., Bieniarz J., and Scommegna A. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 57 (1981) 5717
23. Barthlein W.C., Moodley S., and Stinson S.K. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in mid-forceps delivery and mid-pelvis vacuum extraction. Obstet. Gynecol 67 (1986) 5947
24. Vacca A., Grant A., Wyatt G., and Chalmers I. Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 90 (1983) 1107-1112
25. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for operative vaginal birth. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 88 (2005) 229-236
26. Dupuis O., Ruimark S., Corinne D., Simone T., Andre D., and Rudigoz R.C. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 123 (2005) 193-197
27. Dupuis O., Moreau R., Silveira R., Pham M.T., Zentner A., Cucherat M., et al. New obstetric forceps for the training of junior doctors: a comparison of the spatial dispersion of forceps blade trajectories between junior and senior obstetricians. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 194 (2006) 1524-1531