Does broadband affect economic growth? Agents and territory;¿Afecta la banda ancha al crecimiento económico? Evidencia sobre agentes y territorio

Investigaciones Regionales

Volumn , Issue 10, 2007, Pages

  Suriñach, Jordi ^a   Romaní, Javier ^a   Termes, Montserrat ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Broadband; Economic impact; Telecommunication infrastructure

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548804953     PISSN: 16957253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Access Economics (2003): The Economic Impact of an Accelerated Rollout of Broadband in Hospitals. Australian Government: National Office for the information economy.
2. Annis, R., McNiven, J. y Curri, M. (2005): Industry Canada Broadband Economic Impact Study. Final Report August 31, 2005, Brandon University. http://largebande.gc.ca/pub/program/case_studies/brandon/brandon_en.pdf
3. Antonelli, C. (2003): «The digital divide: understanding the economics of new information and communication technology in the global economy;. Information Economics and Policy 15, pp. 173-199.
4. Aron, D.J. y Burnstein, D.E., (2003): Broadband Adoption in the United States: An Empirical Analysis, paper prepared for presentation at the 31st Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, September,
5. Attenborough, N. (2006): The potential economic benefits of broadband deregulation in Europe. GCC Seminar, London Business School.
6. Baller, J. (2005): «Deceptive Myths About Municipal Broadband;. Broadband Properties, Mayo, 2005, pp. 14-17.
7. Beinisch, Y., Paunov, C., Vickery, G. y Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2005): Digital broadband content: The online computer and video game industry. OCDE, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy.
8. Bel G., Calzada, J. y Fageda, X. (2006): «Liberalización y competencia en España: ¿Dónde estamos?;, Información Comercial Española 829, marzo-abril 2006.
9. CEBR (2003): The Economic Impact of a Competitive Market for Broadband. The Broadband Industry Group.
10. CENIC y Gartner inc. (2006): One Gigabit or Bust iniciative. Document de treball CENIC.
11. C.M.T. (2005): Memoria Anual.
12. Cohill, A.M. (2005): Get Your Community Ready for Business Now. Broadband Properties, Maig 2005; pp. 34-36.
13. COM (2004, 369 final): Connecting Europea at High Speed: National Broadband Strategies.
14. COM (2006 129 final): Superar los desequilibrios en la Banda Ancha.
15. Communications Committee, Working Document (2006): COCOM06-29Final.
16. Correa, L. (2006): «The economic impact of telecommunications diffusion on UK productivity growth;, Information Economics and Policy, 18, pp. 385-404.
17. Crandall, R.W. y Jackson, C.L. (2001): The $500 billion opportunity: the potencial economic benefit of widespread diffusion of Broadband Internet access. Criterion Economics.
18. Estache, A., Goicoechea, A. y Manacorda, M. (2006): « Telecommunications Performance, Reforms, and Governance;. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3822.
19. Fallows, D. (2005): How Women and Men Use the Internet. PEW INTERNET & AMERICAN LIFE PROJECT.
20. Faulhaber, G.R. (2002): «Network effects and merger analysis:Instant messaging and AOL-Time Warner case;. Telecommunications Policy, 26:311-333.
21. Ferguson, C. (2002): The United States Broadband Problem: Analysis and Recommendations. Brookings Institution Working Paper at http://www.brookings.edu/views/papers/ferguson/working_paper_20020531.pdf
22. Ferguson, C. (2004): The Broadband Problem. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
23. Firth, L. y Mellor, D. (2005): «Broadband: benefits and problems;. Telecommunications Policy, 29, pp. 223-236.
24. Ford, G.S. (2005): «Does Municipal Supply of Communications Crowd-Out Private Communications Investment? An Empirical Study;. Applied Economic Studies.
25. Ford, G.S. y Koutsky, T.M. (2005a): «Broadband and Economic Development: A Municipal Case Study from Florida;. Applied Economic Studies, abril 2005, pp. 1-17.
26. Ford, G.S. y Koutsky, T.M. (2005b): «Municipal Broadband Networks and Economic Development: A Case Study from Florida;. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 17, pp. 216-29.
27. Frieden, R. (2005): «Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and The United States;. Telecommunications Policy, 29, pp. 595-613.
28. Gould, B. (2005): «Open Service Provider Networks: Taking America's Communities Into the Digital Age;. Broadband Properties, mayo 2005, pp. 40-42.
29. Grubesic, T.H. y Murray, A.T. (2004): «Waiting for Broadband: Local Competition and the Spatial Distribution of Advanced Telecommunication Services in the United States;. Growth and Change, 35, pp. 139-165.
30. Gumpel, J. (2005): «Small Cities Can Do This: How Windom, MN Built a Fiber-to-the-Home Network;. Broadband Properties, mayo 2005, pp. 52-53.
31. Hardy, A. (1980): «The Role of Telephone in Economic Development;, Telecommunications Policy, 4(4):278-86.
32. Höffler, F. (2005): Cost and Benefits from Infrastructure Competition. Estimating Welfare Effects from Broadband Access Competition, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods,Bonn.
33. Ida, T. y Kuroda, T. (2006): «Discrete Choice Analysis of Demand for Broadband in Japan;. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 29, pp. 5-22.
34. IDC Market Research (2006): The New Zealand ICT sector: economic impact. New Zealand Department of Trade and Enterprise.
35. ITU (2003): Birth of Broadband. International Telecommunication Union Internet Report. Geneva, ITU.
36. Jansen, H. y Bentley, G. (2004): Ontario's Far North study: broadband best practices and benefits in Fort Severn and Trout Lake. Broadband Regional Access Management, Ontario.
37. Kandutsch, C. (2005a): «The Case For 'Municipal Broadband;. Broadband Properties, mayo 2005, pp. 18-25.
38. Kandutsch, C. (2005b): «The Case For Municipal FTTx;. Broadband Properties, junio 2005, pp. 40-45.
39. Kandutsch, C. (2005c): «The Regulatory Environment for Municipal Broadband;. Broadband Properties, Abril 2005, pp. 39-43.
40. Kingsley, L. (2005): «iProvo Utah: 100 Mbps For All;. Broadband Properties, Gener 2005, pp. 14-18.
41. Lee, H., R. M. O'Keefe et al. (2003): «The Growth of Broadband and Electronic Commerce in in South Korea: Contributing Factors.; The Information Society, 19(1):81-93.
42. Lee, Ch. y Ahan-Olmsted, S.M. (2004): «Competitive advantage of broadband Internet: a comparative study between South Korea and the United States;. Telecommunications Policy, 28, pp. 649-677.
43. Lee, H.; Oh, S. y Shim, Y. (2005): «Do we need broadband? Impacts of broadband in Korea;. Info, 7, pp. 47-56.
44. Lehr, Osorio, Gillet y Sirbu (2005): «Measuring broadband's economic impact;. Broadband Properties, diciembre 2005, pp. 12-24.
45. Litan, R.E. (2006): «Broadband for seniors and disabled;. Broadband Properties, Febrer 2006, pp. 24-35.
46. Madden, G., Savage, S. y Simpson, M., (1996): Information Inequality and Broadband Network Access: An Analysis of Australian Household Survey Data, Industry and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, 1049-1056.
47. McWilliams, D. (2003): The Economic impact of broadband. Centre for Economic Business and Research.
48. Pociask, S.B. (2002): «Building a Nationwide Broadband Network: Speeding Job Growth;. New Millennium Research Council and TeleNomic Research. Disponible en http://www.newmillenniumresearch.org/event-02-25-2002/ jobspaper.pdf
49. PriceWaterhouseCoopers; Ovum i Frontier Economics (2004): Technical assistance in bridging the «digital divide;: a cost-benefit analysis for broadband connectivity in Europe. European Space Agency.
50. Ray, L. (2005): «New arguments for municipal broadband;. Broadband Properties, Septembre 2005, pp. 48-51.
51. Richard, G. (2005): «Going with the Incumbent: Fort Wayne Connects With Verizon;. Broadband Properties, mayo 2005, pp. 30-31.
52. Röller y Waterman (2001): «Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: A Simultaneous Approach;, American Economic Review, 91(4):909-923.
53. Ross, S.S. (2005a): «A Renowned Planner On What Makes A Good Town: Architect Andres Duany explains the principles of the New Urbanism;. Broadband Properties, Febrero 2005, pp. 8-15.
54. Ross, S.S. (2005b): «It's the Law in Loma Linda: Mandatory Fiber and In-House Networks An interview with Loma Linda's W. James Hettrick, Director of Information Systems;. Broadband Properties, Mayo 2005, pp. 46-51.
55. Ross, S.S. (2005c): «The Battle Over Public Broadband;. Broadband Properties, mayo 2005, pp. 4-5.
56. Ross, S.S. (2005d): «What Can We Learn From Asia?;. Broadband Properties, feb. 2006, pp. 24-35.
57. Ross, S.S: (2005e): «FTTH Council Europe: Public Investment Predominates;. Broadband Properties, marzo 2005, pp. 16-22.
58. Ross, S.S. (2006a): «A mayor's guide to FTTH: P2P, GePON, EPON, GPON - what does it all mean?;. Broadband Properties, mayo 2006, pp. 32-37.
59. Ross, S.S. (2006b): «Fiber is good for cities and MDUs;. Broadband Properties, mayo 2006, pp. 6-7.
60. Ruiz de Querol, R. (2003): «La política del cable en Cataluña: una reflexión sobre la construcción local de la sociedad de la información;. UOC (http://www.uoc.edu/in3/dt/20086/ index.html).
61. TIA, Telecommunications Industry Association (2003): The Economic and Social Benefits of Broadband Deployment, October.
62. U.S. Department of Commerce, and National Telecommunications & Information Administration (2004): A Nation Online: entering the broadband age.
63. Walsh, J. y Norton, J. (2004): Broadband: its impact on British business. Institute of Directors.
64. Withman, B. (2005): «FTTH expands fast around the world;. Broadband Properties, Septiembre 2005, pp. 42-45.
65. Yilmaz, S; Haynes, K.E. y Dinc, M. (2002): «Geographic and network neighbors: spillover effects of telecommunications infrastructure;. Journal of Regional Science, vol. 42, n.° 2, 2002, pp. 339-360.
66. Adam Smith Institute (2002): Broadband Britain Finding a way forward. Adam Smith Institute.
67. Anderson, B., y Raban, Y. (2005): The Social Impact Of Broadband Household Internet Access. Chimera. Working Paper 2005-06. Colchester: University of Essex.
68. Anderson, B., C. Gale et al. (2003): Domesticating Broadband - what really matters to consumers. Broadband Applications and The Digital Home. J. Turnbull and S. Garrett. London, IEE: 153-176.
69. Andersson, K., Fjell, K. y Foros, Ø. (2004): «Are Interactive TV-Pioneers and Surfers Different Breeds? Broadband Demand and Asymmetric Cross-Price Effects;. Review of Industrial Organization, 25, pp. 295-316.
70. Annis, R. et al. (2005): Industry Canada Broadband Economic Impact Study. Final Report August 31, 2005, Brandon University http://largebande.gc.ca/pub/program/case_studies/brandon/brandon_en.pdf
71. Bauer, J., (2005): «Unbundling Policy in the United States Players,Outcomes and Effects;, Communications & Strategies, 57.
72. BBP Staff (2005): «The International Picture: Broadband is the norm in industrialized Asia; US catching up, Europe is not;. Broadband Properties, marzo 2005, pp. 8-14.
73. Bourreau, M. y Dogan, P. (2001): Regulation and Innovation in the Telecommunications Industry, Telecommunications Policy, vol. 25, pp. 167-184.
74. Bourreau, M. y Dogan, P. (2004): Service-based vs. infrastructure-based competition in local markets, Information Economics and Policy, vol. 16, pp. 287-306.
75. Bourreau, M. y Dogan, P. (2005): «Unbundling the local loop;, European Economic Review, vol. 49, pp. 173-199.
76. Catalysis Communications (2005): Broadband: the next five years. British Telecommunications.
77. Cave, M et al. (2001): The Relationship between Access Pricing Regulation and Infrastructure Competition. Report to OPTA and DG Telecommunications and Post. Brunel University.
78. Centre for Research in Network Economics and Communications University of Auckland (2000): The Costs and Benefits of Regulating Electronic Communications Services: A report to the Ministerial Inquiry into Telecommunications in New Zealand. CRNEC, University of Auckland.
79. Chochliouros, I. y Spiliopoulou-Chochliouros, A. (2005): «Broadband access in the E.U.: an enabler for technical progress,business renewal and social development;. International Journal for Infonomics, 1.
80. Clarke, R.N., Hassett, K.A., Ivanova, Z. y Kotlikoff, L. (2004): «Assessing the economic gains from telecom competition;. NBER working paper series; Working Paper 10482.
81. Crandall, R.W.; Jackson, C.L. y Singer, H.J. (2003): «The Effect of Ubiquitous Broadband Adoption on Investment, Jobs, and the U.S. Economy;. Criterion Economics/New Millenium Research Council.
82. Crandall, R.W., Hahn R.W. y Tardiff, T.J. (2002): The benefits of broadband and the effect of regulation. In: Crandall R.W. and Alleman, J.H., editors, Broadband: Should We Regulate High-Speed Internet Access?, chapter 13, 295-330. Brookings Institution Press, Washinton D.C..
83. De Bijl y Peitz, M. (2005): «Local Loop Unbundling in Europe: Experience, Prospects and Policy Challenges;, Communications &Strategies, 57.
84. Distaso, W., Lupi, P. y Manenti, F.M. (2006): «Platform competition and broadband uptake: Theory and empirical evidence from the European Union;. Information Economics and Policy 18, 87-106.
85. Dogan, P y M. Bourreau (2005): «Build or Buy; strategies in the local loop, KSG Research Working Paper Series.
86. Duvall, J.B: y Ford, G.S. (2001): «Changing Industry Structure: The Economics of Entry and Price Competition;. Phoenix Center Policy Paper, number 10.
87. Edwards, G. y Waverman, L. (2006): «The Effects of Public Ownership and Regulatory Independence on Regulatory Outcomes;. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 29, 23-67.
88. ERG (2005): Broadband market competition report. Comissió Europea.
89. Gabel, D., Kwan, F., (2000): Accessibility of broadband telecommunications services by various segments of the American population, Paper presented for the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, August.
90. Gillett, S.E., Lehr, W.H. y Osorio, C., (2003): Local Government Broadband Initiatives, working paper, MIT.
91. Green, P.E. Jr. (2006): «Fiber to Home: The New Empowerment;. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
92. Greenstein, S y Spiller, P. (1996): Estimating the Welfare Effects of Digital Infrastructure, National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA): WP n.° 5770, September.
93. Hennisz, J yZelner, B. (2001): The Institutional environment for Telecommunications Investment;, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10 (1): spring 2001, pp. 123-147.
94. Hoag, A. (1997): Speed and the Internet: The effects of high speed access on household usage. 25th Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, Virginia.
95. Hoernig, S. (2005): «Should uniform pricing contraints be imposed on entrants?;. CEPR Discussion paper series, n.° 5052.
96. rd Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference.
97. Howell B. (2002): Broadband Uptake and Infrastructure Regulation:Evidence from the OECD Countries, working paper, New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation Inc.
98. Horrigan, J. B. y Rainie, L. (2002): The Broadband Difference: How Online American's Behavior Changes with High-speed Internet Connections at Home. Washington DC, Pew Internet & American Life Project.
99. Ida, T. y Kuroda, T. (2004): Discrete Choice Analysis of Demand for Broadband in Japan. Interfaces for Advanced Economic Analysis Discussion Papers. Kyoto, Kyoto University.
100. Kim J.H., Bauer J.M. y Wildman S.S. (2003): Broadband uptake in OECD countries, paper prepared for presentation at the 31st ResearchConference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, September, Arlington, Virginia.
101. Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T. et al. (2000). «Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households;. Information Systems Research 10:287-303.
102. Kridel, D., Rappoport, P. et al. (2002). «The Demand for High-Speed Access to the Internet;. Topics in regulatory economics and policy, 39:11-22.
103. Lehman, D.E. y Weisman, D. (2000): The Telecommunications Act of 1996: The «Costs; of Managed Competition. Kluwer Academic publishers.
104. Madden, G., Savage, S., y Coble-Neal, G. (1999): «Subscriber Churn in the Australian ISP Market;, Information Economics and Policy, vol. 11, n.° 2, July, pp. 195-208.
105. Madden, G. y Simpson, M. (1997): «Residential broadband subscription demand: an econometric analysis of Australian choice experiment data;. Applied Economics, 29, 1073-1078.
106. McClure, D. (2005): «Razzle-dazzle: The Case Against Public Broadband;. Broadband Properties, Maig 2005, pp. 26-29.
107. McClure, D.P. (2005): «What If It Was All A Great Big Lie?;. Broadband Properties, Juny 2005, pp. 46-48.
108. Norton, S.W. (1992) «Transaction Costs, Telecommunications, and the microeconomics of Macroeconomic Growth;. Economic Development and Cultural Change, October, 41 (1): 175-196.
109. Paltridge, S. y Matsui, M. (2004): Benchmarking Broadband Prices in the OECD. OCDE, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy.
110. Paynter, J. y Chung, W. (2003): «Factors influencing broadband uptake in New Zealand;. Innovation: management, policy & practice, 5(2-3):170-188.
111. Pluthero, J. (2003): Broadband: fulfilling our potential. The Broadband Industry Group.
112. Prieger, J.E. (2003): Unbundling Requirements, State Regulatory Policies and Broadband Internet Access, Department of Economics, University of California.
113. Rappoport, P. N., Kridel D. J. y Taylor L. D. (2002): The Demand for Broadband: Access, Content, and the Value of Time, Working paper presented at the Southern Methodist University economics workshop, August 23.
114. Ray, L. (2005): «New arguments for municipal broadband;. Broadband Properties, Septembre 2005, pp. 48-51.
115. Robertson, A., Soopramanien, D. et al. (2004): «Understanding residential Internet service adoption patterns in the UK;. Telektronikk, 4:84-94.
116. Salinas-Jiménez , M. del Mar: «Public infrastructure and private productivity in the Spanish regions;, Journal of Policy Modeling 26 (1), January 2004, pp. 47-64.
117. Sheperd, W.G. (2002): «Arrowing the broadband: The anti-competitive consequences of the proposed AT&T-Comcast merger;. Economic Politic Institute.
118. Swann, C. y Loomis, D.G. (2005): «There's more competition than you think;. Business Economics, abril 2005, pp. 18-28.
119. The Allen Consulting Group (2003): «True Broadband: Exploring the economic impacts;. An Ericsson contribution to public policy debate.
120. U.S. Department of Commerce, and National Telecommunications & Information Administration, (2002): A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet, February.
121. van Gorp, A.F., Maitland, C.F. i Hanekop, H. (2006): «The broadband Internet access market: The changing role of ISPs;. Telecommunications Policy, 30, 96-111.
122. van Winden, W. y Woets, P. (2004): «Urban Broadband Internet Policies in Europe: a critical review;. Urban Studies, 41(10):2043-2059.
123. Woroch, G. A. (2002): «Local Network Competition;, Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, vol. 1, ed. Cave M., Majumdar S. and Vogelsang I., Elsevier Publishing, pp. 641-716.