Maximization of potential information flow as a universal utility for collective behaviour

Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life, CI-ALife 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 207-213

  Capdepuy, Philippe ^a   Polani, Daniel ^a   Nehaniv, Chrystopher L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION;

POTENTIAL INFORMATION FLOW; TRADEOFF; UNIVERSAL UTILITY;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 34548797964     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ALIFE.2007.367798     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Axelrod, R., (1981). The Evolution of Cooperation. Science, 211(4489):1390-6.
2. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M. and Theraulaz, G., (1999). Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press.
3. Buck, M. and Nehaniv, C.L., (2006). Effect of multi-level fitnesses on the development of multicellular artificial organisms. In Artmann, S., Dittrich, P., editors, Proceedings of the Seventh German Workshop on Artificial Life, pages S1-61. IOS Press.
4. Cover, T., and Thomas, J., (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
5. Der, R., Steinmetz, U. and Pasemann, F., (1999). Homeokinesis - a new principle to back up evolution with learning. In Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control, and Automation, volume 55 of Concurrent Systems Engineering Series, pages 43-47, Amsterdam, 1999. IOS Press.
6. Klyubin, A. S., Polani, D., and Nehaniv, C. L., (2005). AU Else Being Equal Be Empowered. In Capcarrere, M. S., Freitas, A. A., Bentley, P. J., Johnson, C. G., and Timmis, J., editors, Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Artificial Life, volume 3630 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 744-753. Springer, Sep 2005.
7. Klyubin, A. S., Polani, D., and Nehaniv, C. L., (2005). Empowerment: A Universal Agent-Centric Measure of Control. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 1, pages 128-135. IEEE Press, Sep 2005.
8. Klyubin, A. S., Polani, D., and Nehaniv, C. L., (2006). Empowerment, Universal Utilities and the Perception-Action Loop, (in preparation)
9. Michod, R. E., (1999). Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton University Press.
10. Oudeyer, P-Y., and Kaplan, F., (2004). Intelligent adaptive curiosity: a source of self-development. In Berthouze, L., Kozima, H., Prince, C. G., Giulio Sandini, G., Stojanov, G., Metta, G., and Balkenius, C., editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, vol. 117, pages 127-130, 2004. Lund University Cognitive Studies.
11. Prokopenko, M., Gerasimov, V., Tanev, I., (2006). Measuring Spatiotemporal Coordination in a Modular Robotic System. In Rocha, L. et al., editors, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Life, pages 185-191. MIT Press, Aug 2006.
12. Sporns, O. and Lungarella, M., (2006). Evolving coordinated behavior by maximizing information structure. In Rocha, L. et al., editors, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Life, pages 323-329. MIT Press, Aug 2006.
13. Steels, L., (2004). The Autotelic Principle. In Fumiya, I. et al., editors, Embodied Artificial Intelligence, volume 3139 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 231-242. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2005.