Understanding the diversity and dynamics of living with diabetes: A feasibility study focusing on the case

Chronic Illness

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 29-45

  Griffiths, Frances ^a   Anto, Natasha ^a   Chow, Elaine ^a   Manazar, Uzma ^a   Van Royen, Paul ^b   Bastiaens, Hilde ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Methodology; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLNESS BEHAVIOR; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CARE;

EID: 34548796005     PISSN: 17423953     EISSN: 17459206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1742395307079194     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/ (accessed January 2007).
2. International Diabetes Federation. Available at: http://www.idf.org/home/ (accessed January 2007).
3. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/index. htm (accessed January 2007).
4. Glasziou P, Irwig LM. An evidence based approach to individualising treatment. BMJ 1995; 311: 1356-9.
5. Summerskill, William SM, Pope C. 'I saw the panic rise in her eyes and evidence-based medicine went out of the door.' An exploratory qualitative study of the barriers to secondary prevention in the management of coronary heart disease. Fam Pract 2002; 19: 605-8.
6. Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed 'mindlines?' Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 2004; 329: 1013-16.
7. Glasziou P. Evidence based medicine: does it make a difference? Make it evidence informed practice with a little wisdom BMJ 2005; 330: 92.
8. Campbell NC, Murchi P. Treating hypertension with guidelines in general practice. BMJ 2004; 329: 523-24.
9. Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 671-84.
10. Whittemore R. Strategies to facilitate lifestyle change associated with diabetes mellitus. J Nurs Schol 2000; 32: 225-32.
11. Paterson B, Thorne S, Dewis M. Adapting to and managing diabetes. J Nurs Schol 1998; 30: 57-62.
12. Pooley C, Gerrard C, Hollis S, Morton S, Astbury J. 'Oh it's a wonderful practice ... you can talk to them': a qualitative study of patients' and health professionals' views on the managhement of type 2 diabetes. Health Soc Care Community 2001; 9: 318-26.
13. Maclean H. Patterns of diet related self-care in diabetes. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 689-96.
14. Gorovitz S, MacIntyre A. Toward a theory of medical fallibility. J Med Philosophy 1976; 1: 51-71.
15. Samuel-Hodge C, Headen S, Skelly A, et al. Influences on day-to-day self-management of type 2 diabetes among African-American women: spirituality, the multi-caregiver role, and other social context factors. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 928-33.
16. Jayne R, Rankin S. Application of Leventhal's self-regulation model to Chinese immigrants with type 2 diabetes. J Nurs Schol 2001; 33: 53-9.
17. Lawton J, Peel E, Parry O, Araoz G, Douglas M. Lay perceptions of type 2 diabetes in Scotland: bringing health services back in. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 1423-35.
18. Vermiere E, Van Royan P, Coenen S, Wens J, Denekens J. The adherence of type 2 diabetes patients to their therapeutic regimens: a qualitative study from the patient's perspective. Practical Dia-betes Int 2003; 20: 209-14.
19. Diabetes UK. Available at: http://www.diabetes. org.uk/ (accessed January 2007).
20. Greenhalgh T, Collard A, Begum N. Sharing stories: complex intervention for diabetes education in minority ethnic groups who do not speak English. BMJ 2005; 330: 628-31.
21. DIPEx. Personal experiences of health and illness. Diabetes type 1 in young people. Available at: http://www.youthhealthtalk.org/diabetes (accessed January 2007).
22. Department of Health. National service framework for diabetes: standards. London: DoH, 2001.
23. Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London: DoH, 2001.
24. Cilliars P. Difference, identity and complexity. Complexity Science and Society Conference 2005. Liverpool University.
25. National Research Council. New horizons in health: an integrative approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
26. Cilliers P. Complexity and postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 1998.
27. Byrne D. Complexity, configurations and cases. Theory Culture Society 2005; 22: 95-111.
28. Ragin CC. Fuzzy set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
29. Abbott A. Time matters: on theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2001.
30. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage, 1997.
31. Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group. Available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/study/cpd/subject_index/diabetes/wdc/ usergroup/ (accessed January 2007)
32. Reach G. Role of habit in adherence to medical treatment. Diabetic Med 2004; 22: 415-20.
33. Savoca M, Miller C. Food selection and eating patterns: themes found among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nutrition Educ Behav 2001; 33: 224-33.
34. Macaden L, Clarke C. Risk perception among older South Asian people in the UK with type 2 diabetes. Int J Older People Nurs 2006; 1: 177-81.
35. Carter Edwards L, Skelly A, Cagle C, Appel S, Jackson E. 'They care but don't understand': family support of African American women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educator 2004; 30: 493-501.
36. Vincent D, Clark L, Zimmer LM, Sanchez J. Using focus groups to develop a culturally competent diabetes self-management program for Mexican Americans. Diabetes Educator 2006; 32: 89-97.
37. Adam B. Timewatch: the social analysis of time. London: Polity Press, 1995.
38. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage, 2004.
39. McCarthy C, Arnall F, Strimpakos N, Freemont A, Oldham J. The biopsychosocial classification of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev 2004; 9: 17-30.
40. Fishman D. Transcending the efficacy versus effectiveness research debate: proposal for a new, electronic 'Journal of Pragmatic Case Studies'. Prevention Treatment 2000; 3: 1-25.
41. Welch G, Jacobson A, Polonsky W. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 760-6.
42. Weinger K, Butler H, Welch G, La Greca A. Measuring diabetes self-care. A psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-revised with adults. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1346-52.
43. Sturt J, Hearnshaw H. Measuring outcomes: self-management, empowerment and self-efficacy. Diabetic Med 2003; 20(suppl 2): 78.
44. Holt T. Complexity for clinicians. London: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2004.
45. Sweeney K, Griffiths F. Complexity and health care: an introduction. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2003.