Intraorganizational implementation research: Theory and method

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 553-566

  Mischen, Pamela A ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548784961     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mul027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Argyris, Chris, Robert Putnam, and Diana McLain Smith. 1985. Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Argyris, Chris, and Donald Schön. 1978. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bishop, Sheila Watson. 2003. Welfare reform from the inside out: Implementing the Missouri families-mutual responsibility demonstration plan. Administration and Society 35:597-628.
4. Choo, Chun Wei. 1998. The knowing organization. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
5. Ditmar Coffield, C. 2002. Welfare reform in Indiana: The political economy of restricting access to education and training. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 23:261-84.
6. Edin, Kathryn. 2003. Client-based ethnographic research as a tool for implementation analysis. In Policy into action, ed. M. C. Lennon and T. Corbett, 165-92. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
7. Elmore, Richard F. 1978. Organizational models of social program implementation. Public Policy 26:185-228.
8. Fox, Charles J. 1990. Implementation research: Why and how to transcend positivist methodologies. In Implementation and the policy process, ed. D. J. Palumbo and D. J. Calista, 199-212. New York, NY: Greenwood.
9. Gagliardi, Pasquale. 1986. The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organization Studies 7:117-34.
10. Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.
11. Gummesson, Evert. 2000. Qualitative methods in management research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Hagen, Jan L., and Judith Owens-Manley. 2002. Issues in implementing TANF in New York: The perspective of frontline workers. Social Work 47:171-82.
13. Hatch, Mary Jo. 1997. Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
14. Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
15. Lurie, Irene. 2003. Field network studies. In Policy into action, ed. M. C. Lennon and T. Corbett, 81-105. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
16. Lurie, Irene, and Norma M. Riccucci. 2003. Changing the "culture" of welfare offices from, vision to the front lines. Administration and Society 34:653-77.
17. March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
18. Mead, Lawrence M. 2001. Welfare reform in Wisconsin. Administration and Society 33:523-54.
19. Meyers, Mareia K., and Nara Dillon. 1999. Institutional Paradoxes: Why welfare workers cannot reform welfare. In Public management reform and innovation, ed. H. G. Frederickson and J. M. Johnston, 230-58. Tuscaloosa, AL: Univ. of Alabama Press.
20. Meyers, Mareia K., Bonnie Glaser, and Karin MacDonald. 1998. On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17:1-22.
21. Meyers, Marcia K., Norma M. Riccucci, and Irene Lurie. 2001. Achieving goal congruence in complex environments: The case of welfare reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11:165-201.
22. Mischen, Pamela A. 2002. Organizational knowing in welfare agencies. PhD diss., Arizona State Univ.
23. Montjoy, Robert S., and Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr. 1979. Toward a theory of policy implementation: An organizational perspective. Public Administration Review 39:465-76.
24. Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
25. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 2000. Research, on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:263-88.
26. PA Department of Public Welfare. Division of Staff Development. 2000. What is welfare? Harrisburg, PA.
27. Sandfort, Jodi. 1999. The structural impediments to human service collaboration: Examining welfare reform at the front lines. Social Service Review 73:314-39.
28. Simon, Herbert A. 1976. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making process in administrative organization. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Free Press.
29. Stoecker, Randy. 1991. Evaluating and rethinking the case study. The Sociological Review 39:88-112.
30. Yanow, Dvora. 1996. How does a policy mean? Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
31. Yin, Robert K 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.