Equilibrium point control cannot be refuted by experimental reconstruction of equilibrium point trajectories

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1075-1082

  Kistemaker, Dinant A ^a   Van Soest, Arthur J ^a   Bobbert, Maarten F ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; KINEMATICS; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE STIFFNESS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLEX; SIMULATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARM; BONE AND BONES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELBOW JOINT; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL;

EID: 34548775714     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00287.2007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agarwal GC, Gottlieb GL. Oscillation of the human ankle joint in response to applied sinusoidal torque on the foot. J Physiol 268: 151-176, 1977.
2. Bennet DJ, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Hunter IW. Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 88: 433-442, 1992.
3. de Zee M, Voigt M. Moment dependency of the series elastic stiffness in the human plantar flexors measured in vivo. J Biomech 34: 1399-1406, 2001.
4. Feldman AG. Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 18: 17-54, 1986.
5. Feldman AG, Adamovich SV, Ostry DJ, Flanagan JR. In: Multiple Muscle Systems, edited by Winters JM, Woo SL-Y. New York: Springer, 1990, ch. 43, p. 195-213.
6. Golub GH, Van Loan CF. Matrix Computations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989, p. 557-558.
7. Gomi H, Osu R. Task-dependent viscoelasticity of human multijoint arm and its spatial characteristics for interaction with environments. J Neurosci 18: 8965-8978, 1998.
8. Gomi H, Kawato. Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement. Science 272: 117-120, 1996.
9. Gomi H, Kawato M. Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement. Biol Cybern 76: 163-171, 1997.
10. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ, Sanguineti V, Laboissiere R. Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? J Neurophysiol 79: 1409-1424, 1998.
11. Günther M, Ruder H. Synthesis of two- dimensional human walking: a test of the λ-model. Biol Cybern 89: 89-106, 2003.
12. Hatze H. Myocybernetic control models of skeletal muscle. Pretoria: University of South Africa, 1981, p. 31-42.
13. Hinder MR, Milner TE. The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement. J Physiol 549: 953-963, 2003.
14. Hunter IW, Kearney RE. Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. J Biomech 15: 747-752, 1982.
15. Katayama M, Kawato M. Virtual trajectory and stiffness ellipse during multijoint arm movement predicted by neural inverse models. Biol Cybern 69: 353-362, 1993.
16. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727, 1999.
17. 2+] sensitivity adds stiffness to muscle. J Biomech 38: 1816-1821, 2005.
18. Kistemaker DA, Van Soest AJ, Bobbert MF. Is equilibrium point control feasible for fast goal-directed single-joint movements? J Neurophysiol 95: 2898-3012, 2006.
19. Kistemaker DA, Van Soest AJ, Bobbert MF. Open-loop control of equilibrium position and stiffness of the human elbow joint; a Model Study. Biol Cybern 96: 341-350.
20. Lacquaniti F, Licata F, Soechting JF. The mechanical behavior of the human forearm in response to transient perturbations. Biol Cybern 44: 35-46, 1982.
21. Lagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J Optim 9: 112-147, 1998.
22. McIntyre J, Bizzi E. Servo hypotheses for the biological control of movement. J Mot Behav 25: 193-202, 1993.
23. Mehta B, Schaal S. Forward models in visuomotor control. J Neurophysiol 88: 942-953, 2002.
24. Ostry DJ, Feldman AG. A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control. Exp Brain Res 221: 275-288, 2003.
25. Popescu F, Hidler JM, Rymer WZ. Elbow impedance during goal-directed movements. Exp Brain Res 52: 17-28, 2003.
26. Schweighofer N, Arbib MA, Kawato M. Role of the cerebellum in reaching movements in humans. I. Distributed inverse dynamics control. Eur J Neurosci 10: 86-94, 1998.
27. Shidara M, Kawano K, Gomi H, Kawato M. Inverse-dynamics model eye movement control by Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. Nature 365: 50-52, 1993.
28. St-Onge N, Adamovich SV, Eldman AG. Control processes underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: experimental study and modelling. Neuroscience 79: 295-316, 1997.
29. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
30. Van Soest AJ, Bobbert MF. The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements. Biol Cybern 69: 195-204, 1993.
31. Winters JM, Stark L. Estimated mechanical properties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. J Biomech 21: 1027-1041, 1988.
32. Wolpert, DM, Miall, C, Kawato, M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2: 338-347, 1998.
33. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3, Suppl: 1212-1217, 2000.