A job pause service under LAM/MPI+BLCR for transparent fault tolerance

Proceedings - 21st International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, IPDPS 2007; Abstracts and CD-ROM

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Wang, Chao ^a   Mueller, Frank ^a   Engelmann, Christian ^b   Scott, Stephen L ^b  

^a North Carolina State University

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

CHECKPOINTS; LARGE SCALE CLUSTERS; PARALLEL BENCHMARK;

FAULT TOLERANCE;

EID: 34548768671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IPDPS.2007.370307     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Y. Amir, L. E. Moser, P. M. Melliar-Smith, D. A. Agarwal, and P. Ciarfella. The Totem single-ring ordering and membership protocol. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 13(4):311-342, Nov. 1995.
2. T. Angskun, G. Fagg, G. Bosilca, J. Pjesivac-Grbovic, and J. Dongarra. Scalable fault tolerant protocol for paralle runtime environments. In Ero PVM/MPI, 2006.
3. T. Angskun, G. Fagg, G. Bosilca, J. Pjesivac-Grbovic, and J. Dongarra. Self-healing network for scalable fault tolerant runtime environments. In Austrian-Hungarian Workshop on Distributed and Parallel Systems, 2006.
4. R. T. Aulwes, D. J. Daniel, N. N. Desai, R. L. Graham, L. D. Risinger, M. A. Taylor, T. S. Woodall, and M. W. Sukalski. Architecture of LA-MPI, a network-fault-tolerant MPI. In Int'l Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004.
5. N. T. Bhatti, M. A. Hiltunen, R. D. Schlichting, and W. Chiu. Coyote: a system for constructing fine-grain configurable communication services. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 16(4):321-366, 1998.
6. G. Bosilca, A. Boutellier, and F. Cappello. MPICH-V: Toward a scalable fault tolerant MPI for volatile nodes. In Supercomputing, Nov. 2002.
7. G. Bronevetsky, D. Marques, K. Pingali, and P. Stodghill. Automated application-level checkpointing of MPI programs. In ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, June 2003.
8. G. Bronevetsky, D. Marques, K. Pingali, and P. Stodghill. Collective operations in an application-level fault tolerant MPI system. In International Conference on Supercomputing, June 2003.
9. R. Butler, W. Gropp, and E. L. Lusk. A scalable processmanagement environment for parallel programs. In Euro PVM/MPI, pages 168-175, 2000.
10. J. Cao, Y. Li, and M. Guo. Process migration for mpi applications based on coordinated checkpoint. In Int'l Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pages 306-312, 2005.
11. S. Chakravorty, C. Mendes, and L. Kale. Proactive fault tolerance in large systems. In Workshop on High Performance Computing Reliability Issues, 2005.
12. J. Duell. The design and implementation of berkeley lab's linux checkpoint/restart. Tr, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2000.
13. G. E. Fagg and J. J. Dongarra. FT-MPI: Fault Tolerant MPI, supporting dynamic applications in a dynamic world. In Euro PVM/MPI User's Group Meeting, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 1908, pages 346-353, 2000.
14. R. Friedman and R. van Renesse. Strong and weak virtual synchrony in Horus. Technical Report TR95-1537, Cornell University, Computer Science Department, Aug. 24, 1995.
15. J. Hursey, J. M. Squyres, and A. Lumsdaine. A checkpoint and restart service specification for open mpi. Technical report, Indiana University, Computer Science Department, 2006.
16. IBM T.J. Watson. Personal communications. Ruud Haring, July 2005.
17. I. Keidar. Group communication, June 12 2000.
18. M. Litzkow. Remote unix - turning idle workstations into cycle servers. In Usenix Summer Conference, pages 381-384, 1987.
19. M. Litzkow, T. Tannenbaum, J. Basney, and M. Livny. Checkpoint and migration of UNIX processes in the Condor distributed processing system. Technical Report UW-CS-TR-1346, University of Wisconsin - Madison Computer Sciences Department, April 1997.
20. D. Malki, D. Dolev, and R. Strong. A framework for partitionable membership service, Aug. 19 1995.
21. I. Philp. Software failures and the road to a petaflop machine. In Workshop on High Performance Computing Reliability Issues. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
22. J. S. Plank, M. Beck, G. Kingsley, and K. Li. Libckpt: Transparent checkpointing under Unix. In Usenix Winter Technical Conference, pages 213-223, January 1995.
23. M. L. Powell and B. P. Miller. Process migration in DE-MOS/MP. In Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 110-119, Oct. 1983.
24. S. Sankaran, J. M. Squyres, B. Barrett, A. Lumsdaine, J. Duell, P. Hargrove, and E. Roman. The LAM/MPI check-point/restart framework: System-initiated checkpointing. In Proceedings, LACSI Symposium, Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA, October 2003.
25. J. M. Squyres, B. Barrett, and A. Lumsdaine. Request progression interface (RPI) system services interface (SSI) modules for LAM/MPI. Technical Report TR579, Indiana University, Computer Science Department, 2003.
26. J. M. Squyres and A. Lumsdaine. A component architecture for lam/mpi. In European PVM/MPI Users' Group Meeting, number 2840 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 379-387. Springer-Verlag, Sep/Oct 2003.
27. G. Stellner. CoCheck: checkpointing and process migration for MPI. In IEEE, editor, International Parallel Processing Symposium, pages 526-531, 1996.
28. A. Tikotekar, C. Leangsuksun, and S. L. Scott. On the survivability of standard mpi applications. In Int'l Conference on Linux Clusters: The HPC Revolution, May 2006.
29. J. Varma, C. Wang, F. Mueller, C. Engelmann, and S. L. Scott. Scalable, fault-tolerant membership for mpi tasks on hpc systems. In International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 219-228, June 2006.
30. A. Wissink, R. Hornung, S. Kohn, and S. Smith. Large scale parallel structured amr calculations using the samrai framework. In Supercomputing, Nov. 2001.
31. F. Wong, R. Martin, R. Arpaci-Dusseau, and D. Culler. Architectural requirements and scalability of the NAS parallel benchmarks. In Supercomputing, 1999.
32. J. W. Young. A first order approximation to the optimum checkpoint interval. Commun. ACM, 17(9):530-531, 1974.