Total field magnetic prospection: Are vertical gradiometer measurements preferable to single sensor survey?

Archaeological Prospection

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 75-81

  Tabbagh, Jeanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Disturbance rejection; Magnetic prospecting; Time variation rejection

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548768096     PISSN: 10752196     EISSN: 10990763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/arp.193     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Barral Ph, Bossuet G, Camerlynck Ch, Dabas M, Daubigney A. 2000. Authumes le Tertre. Rapport d'activité scientifique, fouille programmée: Dijon.
2. Becker H. 2001. Duo- and Quadro-sensor Configuration for High Speed/High Resolution Magnetic Prospecting with Caesium Magnetometer. Magnetic Prospecting in Archeological Sites. Monuments and Sites, Vol. VI, K. M. Lipp Verlag: München; 20-25.
3. Scollar I, Tabbagh A, Hesse A, Herzog I. 1990. Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
4. Shawan SD. 1979. Magnetospheric plasma waves. In Solar System Plasma Physics, Vol. 3, Lanzerotti LJ, Kennel CF, Parker EN (eds). North Holland Publishing: Amsterdam; 211-270.
5. Tabbagh A, Desvignes G, Dabas M. 1997. Processing of Z gradiometer magnetic data using linear transforms and analytic signal. Archaeological Prospection 4(1): 1-13.