Professional editing strategies used by six editors

Written Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 295-322

  Bisaillon, Jocelyne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Authentic writing task; Detection strategies; Linear process; Problem solving strategies in writing; Revision process

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548746904     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088307305977     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy L. (2001). General introduction. A definition of writing and a presentation of the main models. In D. Alamargot & L. Chanquoy (Eds.), Through the models of writing (pp. 1-29). College Studies in Writing. Boston/Dordrecht, Netherlands/New York/London: Kluwer.
2. Allal, L., Chanquoy, L., & Largy, P. (Eds.). (2004). Revision. Cognitive and instructional processes. Boston / Dordrecht, Netherlands/ New York/London: Kluwer.
3. Bisaillon (2005). Réviser: Un travail qui s'apprend [Editing: A work we can learn]. Unpublished manuscript, Université Laval at Québec, Canada.
4. Bisaillon, J. (2006, September). Towards editors profiles. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the EARLI Special Interest Group on Writing (Sig-writing), University of Antwerp, Belgium.
5. Bisaillon, J. (2007 a). Professional editing: Emphasis on the quality of a text and its communicative effectiveness. In D. Alamargot, D. P. Terrier, & J.-M. Cellier (Eds.), Improving the production and understanding of written documents in the workplace (pp. 77-93). New York: Kluwer.
6. Bisaillon, J. (Ed.) (2007 b). La révision professionnelle: Processus, stratégies et pratiques [Professional editing: Process, strategies, and practice]. Québec, Canada: Éditions Nota Bene.
7. Bisaillon, J., Fortier, G., & Préfontaine, C. (2003, January). Le processus de révision de réviseurs professionnels: Problématique et méthodologie [Editing process of professional editors: Problematics of revision, and research methodology]. Paper presented at Les séminaires du CIRAL Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
8. Broekkamp, H., & v an den Bergh, H. (1996). Attention strategies in revising a foreign language text. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Writing research: Theories, models and methodology (pp. 170-181). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
9. Butterfield, E., Douglas, C., Hacker, J., & Albertson, L.R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychological Review, 8 (3), 239-297.
10. Eriksson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research in revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57 (4), 481-506.
12. Flower, L.S., Hayes, J.R., Carey, L., Schriver, Karen S., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37 (1), 16-55.
13. Fortier, G., & Préfontaine, C. (1994). Pauses et processus d'écriture [Pauses, and writing process]. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, XX (2), 209-226.
14. Gaunder, E.P. (1987). Revision using the word processor: Three case studies of experience student writers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
15. Gufoni, V. (1996). Les protocoles verbaux comme méthode d'étude de la production écrite: Approche critique [Think aloud protocols to study written production: A critical review]. Études de linguistique appliquée, 101, 20-32.
16. Hacker, D.J., Plumb, C., Butterfield, E.C., Quathamer, D., & Heineken, E. (1994). Text revision: Detection and correction of errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 65-78.
17. Hayes, J.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods and individual differences and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Hayes, J.R. (2004). What triggers revision ? In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy, Revision. Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 9-20). Boston: Kluwer.
19. Hayes, J.R., Flower, L.S., Schriver, K.S., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language processing (pp. 176-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Horning, A. (2002). Revision revisited. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
21. Laflamme, C. (2007). L'autorévision et la révision professionnelle: Un regard sur les contextes de production de l'activité révisionnelle [Self-editing and professional editing: A look at the contexts of production in revision]. In J. Bisaillon (Ed.), La révision professionnelle: Processus, stratégies et pratiques. Québec City, Canada: Éditions Nota Bene.
22. Magee, J.M. (1995). Grace under pressure: A qualitative and quantitative case study of the revision process of a corporation president. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
23. Piolat, A., Roussey, J.R., Olive, T., & Amada M. (2004). Processing time and cognitive effort in revision: Effects of error type and of working memory capacity. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision. Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 21 - 38). Boston / Dordrecht, Netherlands/ New York / London: Kluwer.
24. Préfontaine, C., & Fortier, G. (1997). Utilisation de la verbalisation dans des situations de recherche sur la production écrite [Verbalization in research studies of writing]. In J.-Y. Boyer & L. Savoie-Zajc, Didactique du français. Méthodes de recherche (pp. 219 - 228). Montréal: Les Éditions Logiques.
25. Rijlaarsdam, G., Couzijn, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2004). The study of revision as a writing process and as a learning-to-write-process. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision. Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 189 - 207). Boston / Dordrecht, Netherlands/ New York / London: Kluwer.
26. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children's composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Development of educational perspectives (pp. 67-95). London: Wiley.
27. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.) Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.