Achieving collective intelligence via large-scale on-line argumentation

Second International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, ICIW'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Klein, Mark ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Collective intelligence; Scalability

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; SCALABILITY;

ARGUMENTATION; COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE; DESIGN OPTIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 34548739665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIW.2007.13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Walton, D.N. and E.C.W. Krabbe, Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. 1995, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2. Denning, P.J. and R. Hayes-Roth, Decision making in very large networks. Communications of the ACM, 2006. 49(11): p. 19-23.
3. Wolfers, J. and E. Zitzewitz, Prediction Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004. 18(2): p. 107-126.
4. Pervan, G.P. and D.J. Atkinson, GDSS research: An overview and historical analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1995. 4(6): p. 475-483.
5. Gopal, A. and P. Prasad, Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction. MIS Quarterly, 2000. 24(3): p. 509-546.
6. Kirschner, P.A., S J.B. Shum, and C.S.C. Eds, Visualizing Argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Information Visualization, 2005. 4: p. 59-60.
7. Moor, A.d. and M. Aakhus, Argumentation Support: From Technologies to Tools. Communications of the ACM, 2006. 49(3): p. 93.
8. Moran, T.P. and J.M. Carroll, eds. Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Computers. Cognition, and Work, ed. G.M. Olson, J.S. Olson, and B. Curtis. 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah NJ USA.
9. Shum, S.J.B., et al., Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale: 15 Years on from gIBIS and QOC, in Rationale Management in Software Engineering, A.H. Dutoit, et al, Editors. 2006, Springer-Verlag.
10. Cluxton, D., S.G. Eick, and J. Yun, Hypothesis Visualization. Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on, 2004: p. p4-p4.
11. Verheij, B., Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2003. 11(2): p. 167-195.
12. Suthers, D., et al, Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. Proceedings of AI-ED, 1995. 95: p. 266-273.
13. Jonassen, D. and H.R. Jr, Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 2005. 1(1/2): p. 113-129.
14. Chklovski, T., V. Ratnakar, and Y. Gil, User interfaces with semi-formal representations: a study of designing argumentation structures. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, 2005: p. 130-136.
15. Hurwitz, R. and J.C. Mallery, The Open Meeting: A Web-Based System for Conferencing and Collaboration. World Wide Web Journal: The Fourth International WWW Conference Proceedings, 1996. 1(1): p. 19-46.
16. Lowrance, J.D., I.W. Harrison, and A.C. Rodriguez, Capturing Analytic Thought, in First International Conference on Knowledge Capture. 2001. p. 84-91.
17. Karacapilidis, N., E. Loukis, and S. Dimopoulos, A WebBased System for Supporting Structured Collaboration in the Public Sector. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2004: p. 218-225.
18. Heng, M.S.H. and A. de Moor, From Habermas's communicative theory to practice on the internet. Information Systems Journal, 2003. 13(4): p. 331-352.
19. Li, G., et al, ClaiMaker: Weaving a Semantic Web of Research Papers. Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web, 2002: p. 436-441.
20. Ito, T., M. Klein, and H. Hattori. Multi-issue Negotiation Protocol for Agents: Exploring Nonlinear Utility Spaces. in Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2007. Hyderabad, India.
21. Klein, M., et al., Protocols for Negotiating Complex Contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2003. 18(6): p. 32-38.