MRI as a problem-solving tool in unexplained failed total hip replacement following conventional assessment

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 955-961

  Johnston, Ciaran ^a   Kerr, Jennifer ^a   Ford, Stephanie ^a   O'Byrne, John ^a   Eustace, Stephen ^a  

^a CAPPAGH NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Hip, MR; Hip, prosthesis; Magnetic resonance (MR); Pulse sequences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548732519     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0349-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Weissman BN. Imaging of total hip replacement. Radiology 1997; 202 3: 611-623.
2. Metz CM, Freiberg AA. An international comparative study of total hip arthroplasty cost and practice patterns. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 3: 296-298.
3. Hirakawa K, Jacobs JJ, Urban R, Saito T. Mechanisms of failure of total hip replacements: Lessons learned from retrieval studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 420: 10-17.
4. Harris WH, Barrack RL. Contemporary algorithms for evaluation of the painful total hip replacement. Orthop Rev 1993; 225: 531-539.
5. Dempsey MF, Condon B, Hadley DM. MRI safety review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2002; 23 5: 392-401.
6. Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ et al. Metal artefact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 2000; 20 3: 699-712.
7. White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2000; 215 1: 254-262.
8. Eustace S, Shah B, Mason M. Imaging orthopedic hardware with an emphasis on hip prostheses. Orthop Clin N Am 1998; 29 1: 67-84.
9. Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sofka CM, Ho ST, Peters LE, Salvati EA. Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: Evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A 9: 1947-1954.
10. Twair A, Ryan M, O'Connell M, Powell T, O'Byrne J, Eustace S. MRI of failed total hip replacement caused by abductor muscle avulsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 6: 1547-1550.
11. Eustace S, Jara H, Goldberg R et al. A comparison of conventional spin echo and turbo spin echo imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170 2: 455-458.
12. Manaster BJ. Total hip arthroplasty: Radiographic evaluation. Radiographics 1996; 16 3: 645-660.
13. Maus TP, Berquist TH, Bender CE, Rand JA. Arthrographic study of painful total hip arthroplasty: Refined criteria. Radiology 1987; 162 3: 721-727.
14. Ovesen O, Riegels-Nielsen P, Lindequist S et al. The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide bone scan in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 6: 735-740.
15. Oyen WJ, Lemmens JA, Claessens RA, van Horn JR, Slooff TJ, Corstens FH. Nuclear arthrography: Combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening. J Nucl Med 1996; 37 1: 62-70.
16. Weybright PN, Jacobson JA, Murry KH et al. Limited effectiveness of sonography in revealing hip joint effusion: Preliminary results in 21 adult patients with native and postoperative hips. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 1: 215-218.
17. Tormanen J, Tervonen O, Koivula A, Junila J, Suramo I. Image technique optimization in MR imaging of a titanium alloy joint prosthesis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6 5: 805-811.
18. Potter HG, Montgomery KD, Padgett DE, Salvati EA, Helfet DA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis. New orthopedic applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 319: 223-231.
19. Sugimoto H, Hirose I, Miyaoka E et al. Low field strength imaging of failed hip arthroplasty: Association of femoral periprosthetic signal intensity with radiographic, surgical, and pathologic findings. Radiology 2003; 229 3: 718-723.
20. Czerny C, Krestan C, Imhof H, Trattnig S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10 4: 214-220.