Conditioned reinforcement in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus

Behaviour

Volumn 144, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 847-859

  Hazlett, Brian A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned reinforcement; Crayfish; Second order reinforcement

Indexed keywords

ASTACOIDEA; CAMPELOMA DECISUM; COLEOPTERA; GASTROPODA; GYRINIDAE; ORCONECTES RUSTICUS;

EID: 34548708630     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: 1568539X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853907781476409     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Acquistapace, P., Hazlett, B.A. & Gherardi, F. (2003). Unsuccessful predation and learning of predator cues by crayfish. - J. Crust. Biol. 23: 364-370.
2. Alvarez, D. & Nicieza, A.G. (2006). Factors determining tadpole vulnerability to predators: can prior experience compensate for a suboptimal shape? - Evol. Ecol. 20: 523-534.
3. Brembs, B. & Heisenberg, M. (2001). Conditioning with compound stimuli in Drosophila melanogaster in the flight simulator. - J. Exp. Biol. 204: 2849-2859.
4. Chivers, D.P., Wisenden, B.D. & Smith, R.J.F. (1996). Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator's diet. - Anim. Behav. 52: 325-320.
5. Dicke, M. & Grostal, P. (2001). Chemical detection of natural enemies by Arthropods: an ecological perspective. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 1-24.
6. Domjan, M. (2005). Pavlovian conditioning: A functional perspective. - Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56: 179-206.
7. Downes, S.J. (2002). Does responsiveness to predator scents affect lizard survivorship? - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 38-42.
8. Dukas, R. (1998). Evolutionary ecology of learning. - In: Cognitive Ecology (Dukas, R., ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 129-174.
9. Hazlett, B.A. (1994). Crayfish feeding responses to zebra mussels depend on microorganisms and learning. - J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 2623-2630.
10. Hazlett, B.A. (2000). Information use by an invading species: do invaders respond more to alarm odors than native species? - Biol. Invasions 2: 289-294.
11. Hazlett, B.A. (2003a). Predator recognition and learned irrelevance in the crayfish Orconectes virilis. - Ethology 109: 765-780.
12. Hazlett, B.A. (2003b). The effects of starvation on crayfish responses to alarm odor. - Ethology 109: 587-592.
13. Hazlett, B.A., Acquistapace, P. & Gherardi, F. (2002). Differences in memory capabilities in invasive and native crayfish. - J. Crustacean Biol. 22: 439-448.
14. Keller, T.A. & Hazlett, B.A. (1996). Mechanical use of crayfish chelae. - Mar. & Freshw. Behav. & Physiol. 28: 149-162.
15. Koops, M.A. (2004). Reliability and the value of information. - Anim. Behav. 67: 103-111.
16. Loy, I., Fernandez, V. & Acebes, F. (2006). Conditioning of tentacle lowering in the snail (Helix aspersa): Acquisition, latent inhibition, overshadowing, second-order conditioning, and sensory preconditioning. - Learn. Behav. 34: 305-314.
17. Mathis, A. & Smith, R.J.F. (1993). Fathead minnows, Pimephales prometas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet. - Anim. Behav. 46: 645-656.
18. McPhie, D.L. & Miller, M.W (2006). Biological Bulletin virtual symposium: Marine invertebrate models of learning and memory. - Biol. Bull. 210: 171-173.
19. Menzel, R. & Müller, U. (1996). Learning and memory in honeybees: From behavior to neural substrates. - Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19: 379-404.
20. Mosolff, M., Müller, D., Hellstern, F., Hammer, M. & Menzel, R. (1998). Effects of secondorder conditioning in honeybees are dependant on the inter-stimulus-interval. - Eur. J. Neurosci., 10: 56-65, Supple 10.
21. Rescorla, R.A. (1980). Pavlovian second-order conditioning: Studies in associative learning. - Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
22. Schwartz, B. & Reisberg, D. (1991). Learning and Memory. -Norton, New York, NY.
23. Staddon, J.E.R. & Cerutti, D.T. (2003). Operant conditioning. - Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54: 114-144.
24. Wisenden, B.D., Cline, A. & Sparkes, T.C. (1999). Survival benefit to antipredator behavior in the amphipod Gammarus minus (Crustacea: amphipoda) in response to injury-released chemical cues from conspecifics and heterospecifics. - Ethology 105: 407-414.
25. Wisenden, B.D. & Millard, M.C. (2001). Acquatic flatworms use chemical cues from injured conspecifics to assess predation risk and to associate risk with novel cues. - Anim. Behav. 62: 761-766.