A method for computing the inter-residue interaction potentials for reduced amino acid alphabet

Journal of Biosciences

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 883-889

  Luthra, Abhinav ^a   Jha, Anupam Nath ^b   Ananthasuresh, G K ^b   Vishveswara, Saraswathi ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Inter residue potential; Multidimensional scaling; Protein folding and design; Reduced MJ matrix

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; MATRIX PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID; DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 34548706643     PISSN: 02505991     EISSN: 02505991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-007-0088-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Cannata N, Toppo S, Romualdi C and Valle G 2002 Simplifying amino acid alphabets by means of a branch and bound algorithm and substitution matrices; Bioinformatics 18 1102-1108
2. Chan S H 1999 Folding alphabets; Nat. Struct. Biol. 6 994-996
3. Cieplak M, Holter S N, Maritan A and Banavar R J 2001 Amino acid classes and the protein folding problem; J. Chem. Phys. 114 1420-1423
4. Dayhoff M O, Schwartz R M and Orcutt B C 1978 A model of evolutionary change in proteins; Atlas Protein Sequence Struct. 5 345-352
5. Fan K and Wang W 2003 What is the minimum number of letters required to fold a protein; J. Mol. Biol. 328 921-926
6. French S and Robson B 1983 What is Conservative Substitution?; J. Mol. Evol. 19 171-175
7. Hansson T, Oostenbrink C and van Gunsteren W 2002 Molecular dynamics simulations; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 190-196
8. Henikoff S and Henikoff J G 1992 Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 10915-10919
9. Jones D T, Taylor W R and Thornton J M 1992 The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences; Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8 275-282
10. Karplus M and McCammon J A 2002 Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules; Nat. Struct. Biol. 9 646-652
11. Kosiol C, Goldman N and Buttimore H N 2004 A new criterion and method for amino acid classification; J. Theor. Biol. 228 97-106
12. Kruskal J B and Wish M 1978 Multidimensional scaling (Sage Publications)
13. Levitt M 1976 A Simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding; J. Mol. Biol. 104 59-107
14. Li H, Tang C and Wingreen N S 1997 Nature of driving force for protein folding: A result from analyzing the statistical potential; Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 765-768
15. Li T, Fan K, Wang J and Wang W 2003 Reduction of protein sequence complexity by residue grouping; Protein Eng. 16 323-330
16. Mairov V N and Crippen G M 1992 Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins; J. Mol. Biol. 227 876-888
17. Miyazawa S and Jernigan R L 1996 Residue - Residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading; J. Mol. Biol. 256 623-644
18. Murphy R L, Wallqvist A and Levy M R 2000 Simplified amino acid alphabets for protein fold recognition and implications for folding; Protein Eng. 13 149-152
19. Regan L and DeGrado W F 1988 Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles; Science 241 976-978
20. Riddle S D, Santiago J V, Bray-Hall S T, Doshi N, Grantcharova V P, Yi Q and Baker D 1997 Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences; Nat. Struct. Biol. 4 805-809
21. Schwartz R M and Dayhoff M O 1978 Matrices for detecting distant relationships; Atlas Protein Struct. 5 353-358
22. Sippl M J 1995 Knowledge-based potentials for proteins; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5 229-235
23. Taylor R W 1986 The classification of amino acid conservation; J. Theor. Biol. 119 205-218
24. Wang W, Donini O, Reyes C M and Kollman P A 2001 BIOMOLECULAR SIMULATIONS: Recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions; Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 20 211-243
25. Wang J and Wang W 1999 A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet; Nat. Struct. Biol. 6 1033-1038
26. Wang J and Wang W 2002 Grouping of residue based on their contact interactions; Phys. Rev. E 65 041911-5
27. Whelan S and Goldman N 2001 A General empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum likelihood approach; J. Mol. Evol. 18 691-699
28. Wolynes G P 1997 As simple as can be?; Nat. Struct. Biol. 4 871-874