Impact of portal versus systemic venous drainage on acute rejection of simultaneous pancreas - Kidney transplantation in pig

Transplantation

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 629-633

  Tang, Yong ^a   Li, You Ping ^a   Li, Jian Shui ^b   Zhang, Zhao Da ^a   Han, Fang Hai ^a   Hu, Wei Ming ^a   Tian, Bo Le ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF NORTH SICHUAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

Acute rejection; Immunological benefits; Pig; Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK); Surgical procedure; Venous drainage

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; GLUCOSE;

ACUTE GRAFT REJECTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COLD ISCHEMIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE URINE LEVEL; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LANDRACE; LAPAROTOMY; MESENTERIC VEIN; NEPHRECTOMY; NONHUMAN; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; PORTAL VEIN; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PORTAL VENOUS DRAINAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION; SYSTEMIC VENOUS DRAINAGE; VEIN ANASTOMOSIS;

ACUTE DISEASE; ANIMALS; GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; SWINE; VEINS;

EID: 34548706613     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000278179.78975.b1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gruessner AC, Sutherland DER. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004. Clin Transplant 2005; 19: 433.
2. Demartines N, Schiesser M, Clacvien PA. An evidence-based analysis of simultaneous pancreas-kidney and pancreas transplantation alone. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2688.
3. Lugagne PM, Reach G, Houry S, Peuchemaure M, Rouchette J, Huguier M. Portal versus peripheral venous drainage in segmental pancreatic transplantation in diabetic rats. Transplantation 1989; 47: 420.
4. Shokouh-Amiri MH, Rahimi-Saber S, Andersen HØ, Jensen SL. Pancreas autotransplantation in pig with systemic or portal venous drainage. Transplantation 1996; 61: 1004.
5. Rosenlof LK, Earnhardt RC, Pruett TL, et al. Pancreas transplantation: an initial experience with systemic and portal drainage of pancreas allografts. Ann Surg 1992; 215: 586.
6. Klauser R, Muhlbacher F, Gnant M, et al. Pancreatic transplantation with venous portal drainage. Lancet 1989; 2: 988.
7. Shokouh-Amiri MH, Gaber AO. Gaber LW, et al. Pancreas transplantation with portal venous drainage and enteric exocrine diversion: A new technique. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 776.
8. OPTN/SRTR 2004 Annual Report, Table 8.6d.
9. Lalla A, Schnitzler MA, Gilmore AS, Ricci JF, Takemoto SK. Immunosuppression and non-immunosuppression drug therapy costs two years post-transplant. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 426.
10. Nakhleh RE, Sutherland DE, Tzardis P, et al. Correlation of rejection of the duodenum with rejection of the pancreas in a pig model of pancreaticoduodenal transplantation. Transplantation 1993; 56: 1353.
11. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney In 1999; 55: 713.
12. Gorczynski RM, Chaw Z, Chung S, et al. Prolongation of rat small bowel or renal allograft survival by pretransplant transfusion and/or by varying the route of allograft venous drainage. Transplantation 1994; 58: 816.
13. Kamei T, Callery MP, Flye MW. Pretransplant portal venous administration of donor antigen and portal venous allograft drainage synergistically prolong rat cardiac allograft survival. Surgery 1990; 108: 415.
14. Nymann T, Hathaway DK, Shokouho-Amiri MH, et al. Patterns of acute rejection in portal-enteric versus systemic-bladder pancreas-kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 1998; 12: 175.
15. Philosophe B, Farney AC, Schweitzer EJ, et al. Superiority of portal venous drainage over systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation: A retrospective study. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 689.
16. Boggi U, Vistoli F, Chiaro DM, et al. The impact of the site of venous drainage on the outcome simultaneous pancreas - kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 528.
17. Stratta RJ, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Egidi MF, et al. A prospective comparison of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric versus portal-enteric drainage. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 740.
18. Petruzzo P, Da Silva M, Feitosa LC, et al. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: portal versus systemic venous drainage of the pancreas allografts. Clin Transplant 2000; 14: 287.
19. Petruzzo P, Bade L, Lefrancois N, et al. Impact of Venous drainage site on long-term patient and graft outcome in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 526.
20. Troppmann C, Gjertson DW, Cecka JM, Mcvicar JP, Perez RV. Impact of portal venous pancreas graft drainage on kidney graft outcome in simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients reported to UNOS. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 544.
21. Gruessner RWG, Nakhleh RE, Harmon JV, Dunning M, Gruessner AC. Donor-specific portal blood transfusion in intestinal transplantation: A prospective, preclinical large animal study. Transplantation 1998; 66: 164.
22. Jaspan J, Polonsky K. Glucose ingestion in dogs alters the hepatic extraction of insulin: In vivo evidence for a relationship between biologic action and extraction of insulin. J Clin Invest 1982; 69: 516.
23. Steiniger B, Klempnauer J. Distinct histologic patterns of acute, prolonged, and chronic rejection in vascularized rat pancreas allografts. Am J Pathol 1986; 124: 253.
24. Dietze O, Konigsrainer A, Habringer C, Krausler R, Klima G, Margreiter R. Histologic classification of pancreatic allograft rejection in the rat. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 932.
25. Li YP, Tang Y, Feng L, et al. The organ specificity of graft survival rates: an evidence-based analysis of 62433 solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 163.
26. Meier-Kriesche HU, Ojo AO, Hanson JA, et al. Increased impact of acute rejection on chronic allograft failure in recent era. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1098.