Oxoanion binding by flexible guanidiniocarbonyl pyrrole-ammonium bis-cations in water

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 72, Issue 18, 2007, Pages 6832-6839

  Schmuck, Carsten ^a   Bickert, Volker ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; COMPLEXATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); WATER;

AMINO ACID CARBOXYLATES; COMPLEX STABILITY; GUANIDINIOCARBONYL PYRROLE CATIONS;

POSITIVE IONS;

AMINO ACID; AMMONIUM DERIVATIVE; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CATION; GUANIDINE DERIVATIVE; PHENYLALANINE; PYRROLE DERIVATIVE; WATER;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; FLUORESCENCE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 34548706476     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo070981z     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. (a) Fabbrizzi, L.; Amendola, V.; Bonizzoni, M.; Esteban-Gómez, D.; Licchelli, M.; Sancenón, F.; Taglietti, A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 1451.
2. (b) Bowman-James, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 671-678.
3. (a) Prins, L. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Timmermann, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2382.
4. (b) Zimmermann, S. C.; Corbin P. S. Struct. Bond. 2000, 63.
5. (c) Rebek, J., Jr. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 278.
6. (d) Meot-Ner, M. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 213.
7. (e) Cooke, G.; Rotello, V. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 275.
8. Mainly by using organic cations such as guanidinium or amidinium cations for anion binding: (a) Schug, K. A.; Lindler, W. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 67.
9. (b) Houk, R. J. T.; Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 255, 199.
10. (c) Blondeau, P.; Segura, M.; Perez-Fernandez, R.; de Mendoza, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 198.
11. (d) Schmidtchen, F. P.; Berger, M. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609.
12. For two recent review articles on supramolecular recognition in water see: (a) Oshovsky, G. V.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Verboom, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2393.
13. (b) Kubik, S.; Reyheller, C.; Stuewe, S. J. Incl. Phenom. Macro. Chem. 2005, 52, 137.
14. Some recent examples for the use of metal-ligand interactions in supramolecular chemistry can be found in: (a) Schubert, U. S.; Hofmeier, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2423.
15. (b) Buryak, A.; Severin, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4771.
16. (c) Imai, H.; Munakata, H.; Uemori, Y.; Sakura, N. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 1211.
17. (d) Wright, A. T.; Anslyn, E. V. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1341.
18. (e) Sirish, M.; Chertkov, V.; Schneider, H.-J. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1181.
19. (f) Ogoshi, H.; Mizutani, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 81.
20. For reviews on hydrophobic interations see: (a) Widom, B.; Bhimalapuram, P.; Koga, K. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 3085.
21. (b) Pratt, L. R.; Pohorille, A. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2671.
22. (c) Southall, N. T.; Dill, K. A.; Haymet, A. D. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 521.
23. For reviews on aromatic interactions in supramolecular model systems see: (a) Waters, M. L. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 736.
24. (b) Hunter, C. A.; Lawson, K. R.; Perkins, J.; Urch, C. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2001, 2, 651.
25. Schmuck, C.; Heil, M.; Scheiber, J.; Baumann, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7208.
26. (a) Schmuck, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 3053.
27. (b) Schmuck, C.; Geiger, L. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1485.
28. For recent examples of peptide receptors by other groups that function in water see: (a) Krattiger, P.; Wennemers, H. Synlett 2005, 706.
29. (b) Schmuck, C.; Wich, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4277.
30. (c) Shepherd, J.; Gale, T.; Jensen, K. B.; Kilburn, J. D. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 713.
31. (d) Rodriguez-Docampo, Z.; Pascu, S. I.; Kubik, S.; Otto, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11206.
32. (e) Darbre, T.; Reymond, J.-L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 925.
33. (a) Schmuck, C. Chem. Commun. 1999, 843.
34. (b) Schmuck, C. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 709.
35. For recent examples on guanidinium-based receptors see: (a) Schmuck, C.; Schwegmann, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3373.
36. (b) Schmuck, C.; Machon, U. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1109.
37. (c) Schmuck, C.; Dudaczek, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7101.
38. (d) Suhs, T.; König, B. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 8150.
39. (e) Schmuck, C.; Schwegmann, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 836.
40. (f) Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 831.
41. (a) Schmuck, C.; Heil, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 633.
42. (b) Schmuck, C.; Heil, M. ChemBioChem. 2003, 4, 1232.
43. Schmuck, C.; Heil, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1339.
44. (a) Hirose, K. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2001, 39, 193.
45. (b) Connors, K. A. Binding Constants; Wiley: New York, 1987.
46. McCarthy, P. Anal. Chem. 1978, 50, 2165.
47. Hossain, M. A.; Schneider, H.-J. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 1284.
48. However, it might also be that the increased flexibility in the host allows for more favorable intramolecular interactions within the host, which also weakens intermoelcular substrate binding. See discussion and references in: Mardis, K. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 971.
49. Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.; Liskamp, R. M. J.; Lipton, M.; Caufiled, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440.
50. Schmidtchen, F. P. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry in Supramolecular Chemistry. In Analytical Nethods in Supramolecular Chemistry; Schalley, C. A., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2007.
51. Some recent examples for the use of ITC in supramolecular chemistry can be found in: (a) Sessler, J. L.; Gross, D. E.; Cho, W.-S.; Lynch, V. M.; Schmidtchen, F. P.; Bates, G. W.; Light, M. E.; Gale, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12281.
52. (b) Schmidtchen, F. P. Org. Lett. 2002, 3, 431.