A MERGE model with endogenous technological change and the cost of carbon stabilization

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 5327-5336

  Kypreos, Socrates ^a  

^a Energy Economics Group   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Climate change; Energy and macroeconomy; Technological change

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; CARBON; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAS EMISSIONS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY;

CARBON-FREE TECHNOLOGY; ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

ENERGY POLICY;

CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ESTIMATION METHOD; MITIGATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 34548705346     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bahn O., and Kypreos S. MERGE-ETL: an optimisation equilibrium model with two different endogenous technological learning formulations. PSI Report 02-16 (2002), Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
2. Barreto L., and Kypreos S. Endogenizing R&D and market experience in the "bottom-up" energy-systems ERIS model. Technovation 2 (2004) 615-629
3. Criqui, P., Klaassen, G., Schrattenholzer, L., 2000. The efficiency of energy R&D expenditures. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Economic Modeling of Environmental Policy and Endogenous Technological Change, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. November 16-17, 2000.
4. Drud A.S. CONOPT: A System for Large Scale Nonlinear Optimization (1996), Reference Manual for CONOPT Subroutine Library. ARKI Consulting and Development A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
5. IEA. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy (2000), International Energy Agency, Paris. 〈http://www.iea.org/Textbase/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=1134〉
6. IEO (International Energy Outlook), 2004. Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, April.
7. Junginger M., Faaij A., and Turkenburg W.C. Global experience curves for wind farms. Energy Policy 33 (2005) 133-150
8. Kouvaritakis N., Soria A., and Isoard S. Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 1-4 (2000) 104-115
9. Kypreos, S., 2000. The MERGE model with endogenous technological change. In: Proceedings of the Economic Modeling of Environmental Policy and Endogenous Technological Change Workshop, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November.
10. Kypreos S. Modeling experience curves in MERGE (model for evaluating regional and global effects). Energy 30 (2005) 2721-2737
11. Manne A., and Barreto L. Learn-by-doing and carbon dioxide abatement. Energy Economics 26 4 (2004) 621-633
12. 2 Emission Limits (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
13. 2 abatement. In: Presented at the International Energy Workshop, 18-20 June 2002, Stanford, USA.
14. Manne A., Mendelsohn R., and Richels R. MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23 (1995) 17-34
15. Negishi T. General Equilibrium Theory and International Trade (1972), North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
16. Neij L. Cost dynamics of wind power. Energy 24 (1999) 375-389
17. Nordhaus W.D., and Yang Z.L. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. American Economic Review 86 (1996) 741-765
18. Watanabe C. The feedback loop between technology and economic development: an examination of Japanese industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 49 (1995) 127-145
19. Watanabe, C., 1999. Industrial dynamism and the creation of a virtuous cycle between R&D, market growth and price reduction. The case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan. In: Paper presented to the IEA International Workshop on Experience Curves for Policy Making-The Case of Energy Technologies, Stuttgart, Germany, May 10-11, 1999.