An economical design for a microclimate vitrine for paintings using the picture frame as the primary housing

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 95-107

  Sozzani, Laurent S G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548703668     PISSN: 01971360     EISSN: 19452330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/019713697806373163     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bosshard, E. 1990. Klimatvitrinen für Gemälde. Restauro 3:176–80.
2. Hackney, S. 1990. Framing for conservation at the Tate Gallery. Conservator 14:44–52.
3. Michalski, S. 1991. Paintings: Their response to temperature, relative humidity, shock, and vibration. In Art in transit: Studies in the transport of paintings, ed. M. F., Mecklenburg. Washington D.C.: National Gallery of Art. 223–48.
4. Padfield, T. 1966. The control of relative humidity and air pollution in show-cases and picture frames. Studies in Conservation 11:8–30.
5. Ramer, B. 1984. The design and construction of two humidity-controlled display cases. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints, 7th Triennial Meeting, Copenhagen. 4.17.46–47.
6. Richard, M. 1991. Control of temperature and relative humidity in packing cases. In Art in transit: Studies in the transport of paintings, ed. M.F., Mecklenburg. Washington D.C.: National Gallery of Art. 279–97.
7. Richard, M. 1994. The transport of paintings in microclimate display cases. IIC Preprints, 15th International Congress, Ottawa. 185–89.
8. Richard, M. 1996. Personal communication. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. 20565.
9. Sack, S. P., and N., Stolow. 1978. A micro-climate for a Fayum painting. Studies in Conservation 23:47–56.
10. Saunders, D., C. L., Sitwell, and S., Staniforth. 1991. Soft Pack–Soft Option? In Art in transit: Studies in the transport of paintings, ed. M. F., Mecklenburg. Washington D. C.: National Gallery of Art. 311–21.
11. Simpson, W. S. 1892. An improved method or means of preserving oil paintings, water colour drawings, engravings, photographs, prints and printed matter from atmospherical deterioration and from decay. British Patent, # 6556.
12. Skalka, M. 1991. Selected bibliography. In Art in transit: Studies in the transport of paintings, ed. M.F., Mecklenburg. Washington D.C.: National Gallery of Art. 259–72.
13. Sozzani, L. 1992. Climate vitrine for paintings using the picture’s frame as the primary housing. Unpublished paper, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, presented to the Netherlands Ministry of Welfare, Health and Culture, April.
14. Stolow, N. 1967. The nonairtight case: Standards for the care of works of art in transit. Paper presented at International Institute for Conservation Conference on Museum Climatology, London.
15. Thompson, G. 1964. Relative humidity: Variation with temperature in a case containing wood. Studies in Conservation 9:153–68.
16. Toishi, K J., and T. Gotoh 1994. A note on the movement of moisture between components in a sealed package.Studies in Conservation 39:265–71.
17. Wadum, J. 1992. De betere klimaatdoos (The better climate box). Het Mauritshuis Nieuwsbrief 2:8–9.
18. Wadum, J. Forthcoming. Microclimate boxes for panel paintings. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings, April 24–28, 1995. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
19. Wadum, J., I.J., Hummelen, W., Kragt, B.A.H.G., Jütte, and L. Sozzani 1994. Research program microclimates: Paintings on panel and canvas. Poster and IIC Preprints, 15th International Congress, Ottawa.