Advances in research on bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in Eucalyptus spp. in China

Forest Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 569-575

  Wu, Zhi Hua ^a   Xie, Yao Jian ^a   Luo, Lian Feng ^b   Zhang, Wei Yao ^a  

^a China Eucalypt Research Centre   (China)

^b Yongan Branch of China Eucalypt Research Center   (China)

Author keywords

Control; Eucalypt; Occurrence and epidemic; Rolstonia solanacearum

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DISEASE; DISEASE CONTROL; DISEASE PREVALENCE; EVERGREEN TREE; HOST PLANT; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; PATHOGEN; VIRULENCE; WILT;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUCALYPTUS; RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM;

EID: 34548701576     PISSN: 10011498     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Buddenhagen I W, Kelman A. Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1964,2:203-230
2. Stéphane G, Christian B. Ralstonia solanacearum: secrets of a major pathogen unveiled by analysis of its genome[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2002,3(3):111-118
3. Cook D, Barlow E, Sequeira L. Genetic diversity of Pseudomonas solanacearum: detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms with DNA probes that specify virulence and the hypersensitive response[J]. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact, 1989,2:113-121
4. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, et al. Proposal of burkholderiagen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus. with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. [J]. Journal of Microbiology and Immunology, 1992,36:1 251-1 275
5. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y. Validation of the published names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB [J]. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1996,46:625-626
6. Chinese source.
7. Chinese source.
8. Dianese J C, Dristig M C G, Cruz A P, et al. Susceptibility to wilt associated with Pseudomomas solanacearum among six species of Eucalyptus growing in equatorial Brazil[J]. Australian Plant Pathology, 1990,19:71-76
9. Coutinho T A, Roux J, Riedel K H, et al. First reportot bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearumon eucalypts in South Africa [J]. Journal of Forest Pathology,2000,30(4):205-210
10. Roux J, Wingfield M J, Coutinho T A. et al. Diseases of Plantation Eucalyptus in the Republic of Congo [J]. South African Journal of Science,2000,96(8):454-456
11. Chinese source.
12. Bonas U. Hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria [J]. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 1994,192:79-98
13. Coburn J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S[J]. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 1992,175:133-143
14. He S Y, Huang H C, A Collmer. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae harpinpss: a protein that is secreted via the hrp pathway and elicits the hypersensitive response in plants [J]. Cell, 1993, 73: 1 255-1 266
15. Wei Z M, R J Laby, Zumoff C H et al. Harpin, elicitor of the hypersensitive response produced by the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora[J]. Science, 1992,257:85-88
16. Flor H H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept [J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1971,9:275-296
17. Akiew E. Trevorrow P R. Management of bacterial wilt of tobacco [A]. In: Hayward A C, Hartman G L. Bacterial Wilt the Disease and Its Causative Agent. Pseudomonas solanacearum[M]. CAB Interational. Wallingford, 1994:179-198
18. Hodges C S, Geary T F, Cordell C E. The occurrence of Diaporthe cubensis on Eucalyptus in Florida, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico [J]. Plant Disease Reporter, 1979,63:216-220
19. Lee S S. Pathology of tropical hardwood plantations in South-east Asia[J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 2003, 33(3): 321-335
20. Roux J, Coutinho T A, Mujuni Byabashaija D, et al. Diseases of plantation Eucalyptus in Uganda[J]. South African Journal of Science, 2001,97 (1,2):16-18
21. Chinese source.
22. Chinese source.
23. Wu Q P, Liang Z C. Identification and pathogenic tests of the causal organism of the bacterial wilt of Eucalyptus [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1988a,9:59-67
24. Chinese source.
25. Grégoire N, Jean M M, Jean B. Congo: rapport de pays pour la conference technique internationale de la FAO sur les ressources phytogenetiques[R]. Leipzig, Germen, 1996:1-52
26. Chinese source.
27. Berga Lemaga, Siriril D, Ebanyat P. Effect of soil amendments on bacterial wilt incidence and yield of potatoes in southwestern Uganda[J]. African Crop Science Journal, 2001, 9(1):267-278
28. Giller K E, Cadish G, Ehaliotis C, et al. Building soil nitrogen capital in Africa[A]. In: Buresh R J, Sanchez P A, Calhoun F. Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa[M], Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No. 51 Madison Wisconsin, USA, 1997: 151-192
29. Chinese source.
30. Chinese source.
31. Chinese source.
32. Chinese source.
33. Ran L X. Suppression of Bacterial Wilt in Eucalyptus and Bacterial Speck in Arabidopsis by Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Strains: Conditions and Mechanisms [M]. Utrecht University, Utrecht. The Netherlands ISBN:90-393-3118-9, 2002:1-142
34. Chinese source.
35. Chinese source.
36. Molina R, Massicotte H, Trappe J M. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community ecological consequences and practical implications [A]. In: Allen M F. Mycorrhizal Functioning and Integrative Plant Fungal Process [C]. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1992:357-423
37. Chinese source.
38. Chinese source.
39. Chinese source.
40. Chinese source.