Two- versus three-dimensional ultrasound in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: Impact on recognition and maternal-fetal bonding. A prospective pilot study

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 276, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 475-479

  Lapaire, Olav ^a   Alder, Judith ^a   Peukert, Regina ^a   Holzgreve, Wolfgang ^a   Tercanli, Sevgi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Maternal fetal relations; Prenatal; Prenatal care; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERNAL CARE; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; NORMAL HUMAN; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL SCREENING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL-FETAL RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; PRENATAL CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 34548671876     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-007-0368-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ji EK, Pretorius DH, Newton R, Uyan K, Hull AD, Hollenbach K, Nelson TR (2005) Effects of ultrasound on maternal-fetal bonding: a comparison of two- and three dimensional imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:473-477
2. Pretorius DH, Uyan KM, Newton R, Hull A, James G, Nelson T (2001) Effects of US on maternal-fetal bonding: 2D versus 3D. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(Suppl 1):20 (Abstract F35)
3. Cranley MS (1981) Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res 30:281-284
4. Timor-Tritsch IE, Platt LD (2002) Three-dimensional ultrasound experiences in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:569-575
5. Dyson RL, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, Johnson DD, Sklansky MS, Cantrell CJ, Lai S, Nelson TR (2000) Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:321-328
6. Heidrich SM, Cranley MS (1988) Effect of fetal movement, ultrasound scans, and amniocentesis on maternal-fetal attachment. Nurs Res 38: 81-84
7. Siddiqui A, Hagglof B (2000) Does maternal prenatal attachment predict postnatal mother-infant interaction?. Early Hum Dev 59:13-25
8. Pretorius DH, Nelson TR (1995) Fetal face visualization using three dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 14:349-356
9. Nelson TR, Elvins TT (1993) Visualization of 3D ultrasound data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 13:50-57
10. Chudleigh T (1999) Scanning for pleasure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14:369-371
11. Brown GF (1988) Short-term impact of fetal imaging on prenatal stress and anxiety. Pre Peri Nat Psychol 3:25-40
12. Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Duniec E, Rabinowitz R, Diamant Y (1995) The effect of the amount of feedback on anxiety levels during ultrasound scanning. J Clin Ultrasound 24:21-24
13. Langer M, Ringler M, Reinold E (1988) Psychological effects of ultrasound examinations: changes of body perception and child image in pregnancy. J Psychosomatic Obstet Gynecol 8:199-208
14. Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Gällstedt-Fransson I, Sjöden PO (1997) Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:86-90
15. Villeneuve C, Laroche C, Lippman A, Marrache M (1988) Psychological aspects of ultrasound imaging during pregnancy. Can J Psychiatry 33:530-538
16. Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Gällstedt-Fransson I, Sjöden PO (1997) Perception of information, expectations and experience among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:86-90