Research in information systems in China (1999-2005) and international comparisons

Frontiers of Business Research in China

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 19-38

  Ji, Shaobo ^a   Min, Qingfei ^b   Han, Weihe ^c  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c IBM Research   (China)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Information systems; Research method; Research topic; Units of analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548671645     PISSN: 16737326     EISSN: 16737431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11782-007-0002-3     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Alavi M, Carlson P (1992). A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(4): 45-62
2. Alavi M, Carlson P, Brooke G (1989). The ecology of MIS research: A twenty year status review. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, 363-375
3. Applegate L, King J (1999). Rigor and relevance: Careers on the line. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 18-19
4. Banker R D, Kauffman R J (2004). The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in management science. Management Science, 50(3): 281-298
5. Banville C, Landry M (1989). Can the field of MIS be disciplined? Communications of the ACM, 32(1): 48-60
6. Benbasat I, Goldstein D K, Mead M (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3): 369-386
7. Benbasat I, Zmud R W (1999). Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 3-17
8. Benbasat I, Weber R (1996). Rethinking "diversity" in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7(4): 389-399
9. Cheon M, Grover V, Saberwal R (1993). The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity. Information and Management, 24(3): 107-119
10. Claver E, González R, Llopis J (2000). An analysis of research in information systems (1981-1997). Information and Management, 37(4): 181-195
11. Culnan M (1986). The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972-1982: A co-citation analysis. Management Science, 32(2): 156-172
12. Culnan M, Swanson E B (1986). Research in management information systems 1980-1984: Points of work and reference. MIS Quarterly, 10(3): 289-301
13. Dubé L, Paré G (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4): 597-635
14. Farhoomand A F, Drury D H (1999). A historiographical examination of information systems. Communication of the AIS, (1): 1-27
15. Farhoomand A F, Drury D H (2001). Diversity and scientific progress in the information systems discipline. Communications of the AIS, (5): 1-21
16. Galliers R D, Land F F (1987). Choosing an appropriate information systems research methodology. Communications of the ACM, 30(11): 900-902
17. Grover V, Lee C C, Durand D (1993). Analyzing methodological rigor of MIS survey research from 1980-1989. Information and Management, 24(6): 305-317
18. Hamilton S, Ives B (1982). MIS research strategies. Information and Management, 5(6): 339-347
19. Hu Changping (1999). Education of information management towards the 21st century in China. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information (in Chinese), 18(1): 3-9
20. Huang W, Wei K K, Watson R (2003). Overview of MIS discipline - background, core courses, research mainstreams and major conferences and journals. Journal of Management Sciences in China (in Chinese), 6(6): 85-90
21. Ives B, Hamilton S, Davis G (1980). A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science, 26(9): 910-934
22. Kim G M, Park C S, Kim J S, Lee H G, Im K S (2005). An empirical study on research diversity in Journal of MIS Research (in Korean). The Journal of MIS Research, 15(2): 149-170
23. Lee A S (1999). Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 29-34
24. Lee A S, Baskerville R L (2003). Generalizing generalizability in Information Systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3): 221-243
25. Lyytinen K (1999). Empirical research in information systems: On the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 25-28
26. Mingers J (2001). Combining IS research methods, towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3): 240-259
27. Mingers J (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal, 13(3): 233-249
28. Nolan R L, Wetherbe J C (1980). Toward a comprehensive framework for MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 4(2): 1-19
29. Paul R J (2002). Is information systems as intellectual subject? European Journal of Information Systems, 11(2): 174-177
30. Robey D (1996). Diversity in information systems research: Threat, promise, and responsibility. Information Systems Research, 7(4): 400-408
31. Swanson E B, Ramiller N C (1993). Information systems research thematics: Submissions to a new journal, 1987-1992. Information Systems Research, 4(4): 299-330
32. Vessey I, Ramesh R, Glass R L (2002). Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2): 129-174
33. Wang Shouyang and Jin Bihui (2000). SCI, SSCI and journals of management science. Journal of Management Science in China (in Chinese), 3(4): 1-6
34. Webster J, Watson R T (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS QuarXerly, 26(2): xii-xxiii
35. Zha Xianjin (2003). Probe into talent cultivating direction and course system in the specialty of information management and information system. Journal of China Society for Scientific and Technical Information (in Chinese), 22(4): 507-512