The governance of back-office integration. Organizing co-operation between information domains

Public Management Review

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 377-400

  Bekkers, Victor ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Back office integration; Domains; e government; ICT; Information management; Information politics; Interoperability

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548654079     PISSN: 14719037     EISSN: 14719045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14719030701425761     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Agterhorst, J. and Thaens, M. (2000) Veranderkundige aspecten van uitvoeringsketens. Ketenmanagement in de publieke sector, Lemma, Utrecht
2. Barron, J. (1994) Thinking and deciding, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Bekkers, V. (1998) Wiring Public Organizations and Changing Organizational Jurisdictions. Public Administration in the Information Age, IOS, Amsterdam
4. Bekkers, V. (2002) Schaken op meerdere borden: Basisregistraties in de publieke sector. Management and Informatie, 11:3, pp. 23-34.
5. Bekkers, V. (1994) Tussentijdse evaluatie van de gemeentelijke basisadministratie, Research report. Tilburg University
6. Bellamy, C. (1998) ICTs and Governance: Beyond Policy Networks? The Case of the Criminal Justice System. Public Administration in the Information Age, IOS, Amsterdam
7. Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J. (1998) Governing in the Information Age, Open University Press, Buckingham
8. Beynon-Davies, P. (1994) Information Management in the British National Health Service: The Pragmatics of Strategic Data Planning. International Journal of Information Management, 14:2, pp. 84-94.
9. Butler, J. and Cantrell, S. (1994) Communication Factors and Trust: An Explanatory Study. Psychological Reports, 74:11, pp. 33-34.
10. Davenport, T. (1997) Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment, Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Davenport, T., Eccles, R. and Prusak, L. (1992) Information Politics. Sloan Management Review, 34:1, pp. 53-65.
12. Dawes, S. (1996) Interagency Information Sharing: Expected Benefits, Manageable Risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15:3, pp. 121-147.
13. De Bruijn, H., Heuvelhof, E. ten and Veld, R. J. In 't (2002) Process Management (Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes), Kluwer, Boston, MA
14. Diesing, P. (1982) Science and Ideology in Policy Sciences, Aldine, New York
15. (1999) Reinventing Government in the Information Age, Routlegde, London & New York
16. (2006) Implementing and Managing e-government, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, London
17. Homburg, V. (1999) The Political Economy of Information Management, SOM, Groningen
18. Homburg, V. M. F. and Bekkers, V. J. J. M. (2002) The Back-Office of E-Government. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii Conference on System Sciences (HICCS) Big Island (Hawaii)
19. Kinkhorst, O. (2000) Het RINIS-concept, keteninformatisering in de sociale zekerheid. Ketenmanagement in de publieke sector, Lemma, Utrecht
20. Knights, D. and Murray, F. (1992) Politics and Pain in Managing Information Technology: A Case Study in Insurance. Organization Studies, 13:2, pp. 211-228.
21. Koppenjan, J. and Klijn, E. -H. (2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks, Routlegde, London
22. Kraemer, K. and King, J. (1986) Computing and Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, 46, pp. 488-496.
23. Kubicek, H. (2004) The Relationship between Government and Citizens: Key Policy and Research Issues. Paper prepared for the IPTS/EU workshop on E-Government in the EU in 2010 IPTS Seville (Spain)
24. Kumar, K. and van Dissel, H. (1996) Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Collaboration in Interorganizational Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 20:3, pp. 279-300.
25. Laswell, H. (1958) Politics: Who Gets What When and How?, World Publ., Cleveland
26. Moon, M. (2002) The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?. Public Administration Review, 62:4, pp. 424-433.
27. OECD (2003) The e-government imperative.OECD, Paris
28. Orlikowski, W. (1991) The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3:3, pp. 398-427.
29. Orlikowski, W. (2000) Using Technology and Constituting Structures. Organizational Science, 11:4, pp. 404-428.
30. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations, Harper & Row, New York
31. Rhodes, R. (1997) Understanding Governance, Open University, Maidenhead
32. Snellen, I. (1987) Boeiend en geboeid, Samsom, Alphen
33. Stone, D. (2002) The Policy Paradox, Norton, New York & London
34. Straten, G. (1996) In de beslotenheid van het openbaar bestuur, Elinkwijk, Utrecht
35. Thompson, J. (1967) Organizations in Action, McGraw Hill, New York
36. Uzzi, B. (1997) Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embedddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:4, pp. 35-68.
37. Van de Ven, A. (1976) On the Nature, Formation and Maintenance of Relations among Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1:1, pp. 24-36.
38. Yin, R. (1994) Case Study Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi