Output order in immediate serial recall

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1093-1106

  Tan, Lydia ^a   Ward, Geoff ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ERROR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; UNIVERSITY STUDENT;

EID: 34548651697     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193481     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BADDELEY, A. D. (2000). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 544-549.
2. BADDELEY, A. [D.], & LARSEN, J. D. (2003). The disruption of STM: A response to our commentators. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1301-1306.
3. BEAMAN, C. P. (2002). Inverting the modality effect in serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 371-389.
4. BEAMAN, C. P., & MORTON, J. (2000). The separate but related origins of the recency effect and the modality effect in free recall. Cognition, 77, B59-B65.
5. BROWN, G. D. A., NEATH, I., & CHATER, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539-576.
6. BROWN, G. D. A., PREECE, T., & HULME, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181.
7. BURGESS, N., & HITCH, G. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106, 551-581.
8. COWAN, N., SAULTS, J. S., & BROWN, G. D. A. (2004). On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 30, 639-644.
9. COWAN, N., SAULTS, J. S., ELLIOTT, E. M., & MORENO, M. V. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 153-177.
10. CROWDER, R. G. (1969). Behavioral strategies in immediate memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 524-528.
11. FARRELL, S., & LEWANDOWSKY, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 59-79.
12. FARRELL, S., & LEWANDOWSKY, S. (2003). Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 838-849.
13. FRIENDLY, M., FRANKLIN, P. E., HOFFMAN, D., & RUBIN, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 375-399.
14. GLENBERG, A. M., & SWANSON, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 12, 3-15.
15. HANLEY, J. R., & BAKOPOULOU, E. (2003). Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: A test of the phonological loop model and the feature model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 435-444.
16. HENSON, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.
17. HOCKEY, R. (1973). Rate of presentation in running memory and direct manipulation of input-processing strategies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 104-111.
18. KAHANA, M. J., & CAPLAN, J. B. (2002). Associative asymmetry in probed recall of serial lists. Memory & Cognition, 30, 841-849.
19. KUCERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
20. LARSEN, J. D., & BADDELEY, A. (2003). Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: Do they have a common source? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1249-1268.
21. LEWANDOWSKY, S. (1999). Redintegration and response suppression in serial recall: A dynamic network model. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 434-446.
22. LEWANDOWSKY, S., DUNCAN, M., & BROWN, G. D. A. (2004). Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 771-790.
23. MAYLOR, E. A., VOUSDEN, J. I., & BROWN, G. D. A. (1999). Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: Data and a model. Psychology & Aging, 14, 572-594.
24. MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482-488.
25. MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1963). Short-term memory and paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2, 320-328.
26. MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1967). Distractor and probe techniques in short-term memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 21, 25-36.
27. NAIRNE, J. S. (1988). A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 16, 343-352.
28. NAIRNE, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251-269.
29. NAIRNE, J. S., CEO, D. A., & REYSEN, M. B. (2007). The mnemonic effects of recall on immediate retention. Memory & Cognition, 35, 191-199.
30. NILSSON, L.-G., WRIGHT, E., & MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1975). The effects of visual presentation method on single-trial free recall. Memory & Cognition, 3, 427-433.
31. OBERAUER, K. (2003). Understanding serial position curves in short-term recognition and recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 469-483.
32. PAGE, M. P. A., & NORRIS, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105, 761-781.
33. POSNER, M. I. (1964). Rate of presentation and order of recall in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 303-306.
34. TAN, L., & WARD, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1589-1625.
35. WARD, G., & TAN, L. (2004). The effect of the length of to-be-remembered lists and intervening lists on free recall: A reexamination using overt rehearsal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1196-1210.
36. WAUGH, N. C., & NORMAN, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
37. WOOD, L. E., & HINRICHS, J. V. (1971). Cuing of recall order in immediate memory with different rates of presentation. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 268-275.