Trial of a new pain assessment tool in patients with low education: The full cup test

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1692-1696

  Ergun U ^a,d   Say, B ^a   Ozer, G ^a   Yildirim, O ^b   Kocaturk O ^a   Konar, D ^a   Kudiaki, C ^c   Inan, L ^a  

^a ANKARA TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^c MERSIN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIATION; FEMALE; FULL CUP TEST; HEADACHE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOCICEPTION; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHEUMATIC DISEASES;

EID: 34548648493     PISSN: 13685031     EISSN: 17421241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01525.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Lund I, Lundeberg T. Aspects of pain, its assessment and evaluation from an acupuncture perspective. Acupunct Med 2006 24 : 109 17.
2. Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am 1999 79 : 231 52.
3. Smith M. Pain assessment in nonverbal older adults with advanced dementia. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2005 41 : 99 113.
4. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. Clin Nurs 2005 4 : 798 804.
5. Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB et al. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992 30 : 917 25.
6. Dionne RA, Bartoshuk L, Mogil J et al. Individual responder analysis for pain: does one pain scale fit all? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2005 26 : 125 30.
7. Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 2000 16 : 22 8.
8. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005 14 : 798 804.
9. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Byram S et al. A new scale for assessing perceptions of chance: a validation study. Med Decis Making 2000 20 : 293 307.
10. Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 1981 10 : 241 8.
11. Herr KA, Spratt K, Mobily PR et al. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain 2004 20 : 207 19.
12. Kane RL, Bershasky B, Rockwood T et al. Visual Analog Scale pain reporting was standardized. J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 : 618 23.
13. Scrimshaw SV, Maher C. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001 24 : 501 4.
14. Zambito A, Bianchini D, Gatti D et al. Interferential and horizontal therapies in chronic low back pain: a randomized, double blind, clinical study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2006 24 : 534 9.