Long-term symbolic learning

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 237-247

  Kennedy, William G ^a   Trafton, J Gregory ^a  

^a NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

ACT R; Computational cognitive modeling; Computational performance; Long term learning; Soar; Symbolic learning; Utility problem

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING;

LONG-TERM LEARNING; SYMBOLIC LEARNING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMBOLISM;

EID: 34548646879     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13890417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ACT-R Research Group. ACT-R. Retrieved October 13, 2006, from http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/.
2. Altmann E.M., and Trafton J.G. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science 26 (2002) 39-83
3. Anderson J.R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review 89 4 (1982) 369-406
4. Anderson J.R. The adaptive character of thought (1990), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
5. Anderson J.R. Learning and memory: An integrated approach. 2nd ed. (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
6. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglas S., Lebiere C., and Qin Y. An integrated theory of mind. Psychological Review 111 4 (2004) 1036-1060
7. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Lebiere C., and Matessa M. An integrated theory of list memory. Journal of Memory and Language 38 (1998) 341-380
8. Anderson J.R., and Fu W.-T. From recurrent choice to skill learning: A reinforcement-learning model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 2 (2006) 184-206
9. Anderson J.R., and Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
10. Bostrom, H. (1992). Eliminating redundancy in explanation-based learning. Paper presented at the Ninth international workshop on machine learning, San Mateo.
11. Doorenbos, R. B. (1995). Production matching for large learning systems, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.
12. Fitts P.M. Perceptual-motor skill learning. In: Melton A.W. (Ed). Categories of human learning (1964), Academic Press, New York
13. Fleetwood M.D., and Byrne M.D. Modeling the visual search of displays: A revised ACT-R/PM model of icon search based on eye tracking data. Human Computer Interaction 21 (2006)
14. Gunzelmann, G. (2006). Understanding similarities in the performance on different orientation tasks: Strategy Adaption. Paper presented at the Seventh international conference on cognitive modeling, Trieste, IT.
15. Holder, L. B. (1990). The general utility problem in machine learning. Paper presented at the Seventh international conference on machine learning, Austin, TX.
16. Iba G.A. A heuristic approach to the discovery of macro operators. Machine Learning 3 (1989) 285-317
17. Jones, R., Laird, J., & Nielsen, P. (1994). Coordinated behavior of computer generated forces in TacAir-Soar. Paper presented at the Fourth conference on computer generated forces and behavioral representation, Orlando, FL.
18. Kennedy, W. G. (2003). Long-term learning in soar and its application to the utility problem, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Fairfax: George Mason University.
19. Kennedy, W. G., & De Jong, K. A. (2003). Characteristics of long-term learning in soar and its application to the utility problem. Paper presented at the Twentieth international conference on machine learning (ICML-2003), Washington, DC.
20. Leake, D.B., Kinley, A., & Wilson, D. (1995). Learning to improve case adaptation by introspective reasoning and CBR. Paper presented at the First international conference on case-based reasoning, Sesimbra, Portugal.
21. Lebiere C. The dynamics of cognition: An ACT-R model of cognitive arithmetic. Kognitionswissenschaft 8 1 (1999) 5-19
22. Logan G.G. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 95 4 (1988) 492-527
23. Markovitch, S., & Scott, P. D. (1988). The role of forgetting in learning. Paper presented at the Fifth international conference on machine learning, Ann Arbor, MI.
24. Minton, S. (1988). Quantitative results concerning the utility of explanation-based learning. Paper presented at the Seventh national conference on artificial intelligence, St. Paul, MN.
25. Minton S. Quantitative results concerning the utility of explanation-based learning. Artificial Intelligence 42 (1990) 363-391
26. Mooney, R. (1989). The effect of rule use on the utility of explanation-based learning. Paper presented at the Eleventh international joint conference on artificaila intelligence, Los Altos.
27. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition (1990), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
28. Newell A., and Rosenbloom P.S. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson J.R. (Ed). Cognitive skills and their acquisition (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
29. Petrov, A. A. (2006). Computationally efficient approximation of the base-level learning equation in ACT-R. Paper presented at the Seventh international conference on cognitive modeling, Trieste, IT.
30. Rosenbloom P.S., and Newell A. The chunking of goal hierarchies, a generalized model of practice. In: Michalski R.S., Carbonell J.G., and Mitchell T.M. (Eds). Machine learning Vol. 2 (1986), Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA
31. Salvucci D.D. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors 48 (2006) 362-380
32. Taatgen N.A. A model of individual differences in skill acquisition in the Kanfer-Ackerman Air Traffic Control Task. Cognitive Systems Research 3 1 (2002) 103-112
33. Taatgen N.A. Modeling parallelization and flexibility improvements in skill acquisition: From dual tasks to complex dynamic skills. Cognitive Science 29 3 (2005) 421-455
34. Taatgen N.A., and Lee F.J. Production compilation: A simple mechanism to model complex skill acquisition. Human Factors 45 1 (2003) 61-76
35. Tambe M., Newell A., and Rosenbloom P.S. The problem of expensive chunks and its solution by restricting expressiveness. Machine Learning 5 (1990) 299-348
36. The Soar Group. Soar. Retrieved July 7, 2005, from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/soar/home.
37. Winston P.H. A prediction of human response. 2nd ed. (1984), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA