Evaluating disease management results: Individuals and cohorts vs. populations

Disease Management

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 185-188

  MacStravic, Scott ^a,b  

^a St Anthony Central Hospital   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC DISEASE; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EMPLOYMENT; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; INVESTMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREDICTION; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE;

DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH EXPENDITURES; HUMANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548645371     PISSN: 1093507X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dis.2007.103645     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Gordian Health Solutions. When It Makes Cents to Back into the 80/20 Rule. Available at: 〈www.health-leadersmedia.com/pdf/white_papers/ wp_gordian_030804.pdf〉. Accessed June 27, 2007.
2. Stave G. Quantifiable impact of the contract for health and wellness. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:109-117.
3. Lynch W. Documenting participation in an employer-sponsored disease management program. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:447-454.
4. Eischen BD. Impact of Health Management Programs: Experiences of Employers. Integrated Benefits Institute Conference November 19-23, 2003. Available at: 〈www.ibiweb.org/forum-presentations/9〉. Accessed June 27, 2007.
5. vielife Ltd. Case Study: Standard Life Healthcare. Available at: 〈www.vielife.com/our_research/SLH.pdf〉. Accessed June 27, 2007.