Looking back to see the future of punishment in America

Social Research

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 353-378

  Tonry, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548632482     PISSN: 0037783X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Albrecht, Hans-Jörg. "Youth Justice in Germany." Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-national Perspectives. Eds. Michael Tonry and Anthony N. Doob. Vol. 31 of Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Ed. Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
2. Alschuler, Albert. " Sentencing Reform and Prosecutorial Power: A Critique of Recent Proposals for 'Fixed' and 'Presumptive' Sentencing." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 126 (1978): 550-77.
3. American Friends Service Committee. Struggle for Justice. New York: Hill and Wang, 1971.
4. American Law Institute. Model Penal Code. Philadelphia: American Law Institute, 1962.
5. Austin, James, Charles Jones, John Kramer, and Phil Renninger. National Assesment of Structured Sentencing. Final Report to the Bureau of JusticeAssistance. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency, 1994.
6. Blumstein, Alfred, Jacqueline Cohen, Susan E. Martin, and Michael Tonry, eds. Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform. Vol 2. Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press, 1983.
7. Boerner, David, and Roxanne Lieb. "Sentencing Reform in the Other Washington." Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Vol. 28. Ed. Michael Tonry.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
8. Bogan, Kathy, and David Factor. "Oregon Guidelines, 1989-1994." Sentencing Reform in Overcrowded Times. Eds. Michael Tonry and Kathleen Hatlestad. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
9. Bottoms, Anthony, Kent Roach, Julian Roberts, and Andrew von Hirsch, eds. Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Oxford: Hart, 2005.
10. Brody, Stephen. The Effectiveness of Sentencing: A Review of the Literature. London: H. M Stationery Office, 1976.
11. Cullen, Frank, and Karen Gilbert. Reaffirming Rehabilitation. Cincinnati: Anderson, 1982.
12. Davis, Kenneth Culp. Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1969.
13. Feinberg, Joel. "The Experiment Function of Punishment." Doing and Deserving: Essays in Theory of Responsibility. Ed. Joel Feinberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.
14. Fogel, David. We Are the Living Proof: The Justice Model for Corrections. Cincinnati: Anderson, 1975.
15. Frankel, Marvin. Criminal Sentences: Law without Order. New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.
16. Frase, Richard S. "Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota, 1978-2003." Crime andJustice: A Review of Research. Vol. 32. Ed. Michael Tonry. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2005.
17. Frase, Richard S. "State Sentencing Guidelines: Diversity, Consensus, and Unresolved Policy Issues in Symposium, Sentencing: What's At Stake for the States?" Columbia Law Review 105 (2005): 1190-1232.
18. Garland, David. The Culture of Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
19. Knapp, Kay A. The Impact of Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines: Three-Year Evaluation. St. Paul: Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission, 1984.
20. Kyvsgaard, Britta. "Youth Justice in Denmark." Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-national Perspectives. Eds. Michael Tonry and Anthony N. Doob. Vol. 31 of Crime and justice: A Review of Research. Ed. Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
21. Janson, Carl-Gunnar. "Youth Justice in Sweden." Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-national Perspectives. Eds. Michael Tonry and Anthony N. Doob. Vol. 31 of Crime and justice: A Review of Research. Ed. Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
22. Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio. "Sentencing and Punishment in Finland: The Decline of the Repressive Ideal." entencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. Eds. Michael Tonry and Richard S. Frase. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
23. _. "Penal Policy in Scandinavia." Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Vol. 36. Ed. Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
24. Manza, Jeff, and Christopher Uggen. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
25. Martinson, Robert. "What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform."Public Interest 35:2 (1974): 22-54.
26. Messinger, Sheldon, and Philip Johnson. "California's Determinate Sentencing Laws." Determinate Sentencing: Reform or Regression. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.
27. Morris, Herbert. "A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment." A Reader on Punishment. Eds. Antony Duff and David Garland. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
28. Morris, Norval. The Future of Imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
29. Murphy, Jeffrey M. "Marxism and Retribution." A Reader on Punishment. Eds. Antony Duff and David Garland. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.
30. National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.
31. National Commission on Reform of Federal Criminal Law. Report. Washington,D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.
32. Newburn, Tim. "Tough On Crime: Penal Policy in England and Wales." Crime andjustice: A Review of Research. Vol. 36. Ed. Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
33. Palmer, Ted. Correctional Treatment and Research: Current Issues and Future Prospects. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1978.
34. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967.
35. Reitz, Kevin. "The Disassembly and Reassembly of U.S. Sentencing Practices." Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. Eds. Michael Tonry and Richard S. Frase. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
36. Robinson, Paul. "Virtues of Restorative Processes, the Vices of Restorative Justice.'" Utah Law Review 1 (2003): 375-88.
37. Rothman, David J. Conscience and Convenience. Boston: Little, Brown, 1980.
38. Shane-Dubow, Sandra, Alice P. Brown, and Erik Olsen. Sentencing Reform in the United States: History, Content, and Effect. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985.
39. Tonry, Michael. Sentencing Reform Impacts. Washington, D.C.: U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, 1986.
40. _. Malign Neglect-Race, Crime, and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
41. _. Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
42. _. Thinking about Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
43. _. "Obsolescence and Immanence in Penal Theory and Policy." Columbia Law Review 105 (2005): 1233-75.
44. von Hirsch, Andrew. Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hilland Wang, 1976.
45. _. Past or Future Crimes: Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of Criminals. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1985.
46. _. Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
47. von Hirsch, Andrew, and Andrew Ashworth. Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
48. von Hirsch, Andrew, Kay Knapp, and Michael Tonry. The Sentencing Commission and Its Guidelines. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1987.
49. Whitman, James Q. Harsh Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.