Leaf dry matter content and lateral spread predict response to land use change for six subalpine grassland species

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 289-300

  Gross, Nicolas ^a   Suding, Katharine Nash ^b   Lavorel, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominant species; French Alps; Plant functional trait; Primary trade off; Secondary trade off; Species strategy; Trade off

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548628731     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[289:LDMCAL]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ackerly, D.D. 2004a. Functional strategies of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance. Ecol. Monogr. 74: 25-44.
2. Ackerly, D.D. 2004b. Adaptation, niche conservatism, and convergence: Comparative studies of leaf evolution in the California chaparral. Am. Nat. 163: 654-671.
3. Al Haj Khaled, Duru, R.M., Theau, J.P., Plantureux, S. & Cruz, P. 2005. Variation in leaf traits through seasons and N-availability levels and its consequences for ranking grassland species. J. Veg. Sci. 16: 391-398.
4. Augustine, D.J. & McNaughton, S.J. 1998. Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: Herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J. Wildl. Manage. 62: 1165-1183.
5. Chapin, F.S., Walker, B.H., Hobbs, R.J., Hooper, D.U., Lawton, J.H., Sala, O.E. & Tilman, D. 1997. Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 277: 500-504.
6. Chapin, F.S., Zavaleta, E.S., Eviner, V.T., Naylor, R.L., Vitousek, P.M., Reynolds, H.L., Hooper, D.U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O.E., Hobbie, S.E., Mack, M.C. & Díaz, S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234-242.
7. Corcket, E., Liancourt, P., Callaway, R.M. & Michalet, R. 2003. The relative importance of competition for two dominant grass species as affected by environmental manipulations in the field. Ecoscience 10: 186-194.
8. Cornelissen, J.H.C., Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., Diaz, S., Buchmann, N., Gurvich, D.E., Reich, P.B., ter Steege, H., Morgan, H.D., van der Heijden, M.G.A., Pausas, J.G. & Poorter, H. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51:335-380.
9. Craine, J.M. 2005. Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman. J. Ecol. 93: 1041-1052.
10. Craine, J.M., Froehle, J., Tilman, D.G., Wedin, D.A. & Chapin, F.S. 2001. The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93: 274-285.
11. De Bello, F., Lepš, J. & Sebastià, M.T. 2005 Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 824-833.
12. Díaz, S., Hodgson, J.G., Thompson, K., Cabido, M., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Jalili, A., Montserrat-Marti, G., Grime, J.P., Zarrinkamar, F., Asri, Y., Band, S.R., Basconcelo, S., Castro-Diez, P., Funes, G., Hamzehee, B., Khoshnevi, M., Perez-Harguindeguy, N., Perez-Rontome, M.C., Shirvany, F.A., Vendramini, F., Yazdani, S., Abbas-Azimi, R., Bogaard, A., Boustani, S., Charles, M., Dehghan, M., de Torres-Espuny, L., Falczuk, V., Guerrero-Campo, J., Hynd, A., Jones, G., Kowsary, E., Kazemi-Saeed, F., Maestro-Martinez, M., Romo-Diez, A., Shaw, S., Siavash, B., Villar-Salvador, P. & Zak, M.R. 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 295-304.
13. Elberse, W.T. & Berendse, F. 1993. A comparative-study of the growth and morphology of 8 grass species from habitats with different nutrient availabilities. Funct. Ecol. 7: 223-229.
14. Fonseca, C.R., Overton, J.M., Collins, B. & Westoby, M. 2000. Shifts in trait-combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients. J. Ecol. 88: 964-977.
15. Fynn, R.W.S., Morris, C.D. & Kirkman, K.P. 2005a. Plant strategies and trait trade-offs influence trends in competitive ability along gradients of soil fertility and disturbance. J. Ecol. 93: 384-394.
16. Fynn, R.W.S., Morris, C.D. & Edwards. T.J. 2005b. Long-term compositional responses of a south African mesic grassland to burning and mowing. Appl. Veg. Sci. 8: 5-12.
17. Garnier, E., Salager, J.L., Laurent, G. & Sonie, L. 1999. Relationships between photosynthesis, nitrogen and leaf structure in 14 grass species and their dependence on the basis of expression. New Phytol. 143: 119-129.
18. Garnier, E., Laurent, G., Bellmann, A., Debain, S., Berthelier, P., Ducout, B., Roumet, C. & Navas, M.L. 2001. Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. New Phytol. 152: 69-83.
19. Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billes, G., Navas, M.L., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., Neill, C. & Toussaint, J.P. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85: 2630-2637.
20. Gaucherand, S. 2005. Effects of agricultural management of mountain pastures on biodiversty and its dynamics in the Northern French Alps - contribution of the plant funtional traits approach. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Montpellier II, Montpellier, FR.
21. Gaudet, C.L. & Keddy, P.A. 1988. A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334: 242-243.
22. Grace, J.B. 1991. A clarification of the debate between Grime and Tilman. Funct. Ecol. 5: 583-587.
23. Grime, J.P. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242: 344-347.
24. Grime, J.P. 1977. Evidence for existence of 3 primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111: 1169-1194.
25. Grime, J.P., Thompson, K., Hunt, R., Hodgson, J.G., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Rorison, I.H., Hendry, G.A.F., Ashenden, T.W., Askew, A.P., Band, S.R., Booth, R.E., Bossard, C.C., Campbell, B.D., Cooper, J.E.L., Davison, A.W., Gupta, P.L., Hall, W., Hand, D.W., Hannah, M.A., Hillier, S.H., Hodkinson, D.J., Jalili, A., Liu, Z., Mackey, J.M.L., Matthews, N., Mowforth, M.A., Neal, A.M., Reader, R.J., Reiling, K., RossFraser, W., Spencer, R.E., Sutton, F., Tasker, D.E., Thorpe, P.C. & Whitehouse, J. 1997. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79: 259-281.
26. Hodgson, J.G., Wilson, P.J., Hunt, R., Grime, J.P. & Thompson, K. 1999. Allocating C-S-R plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. Oikos 85: 282-294.
27. Hurst, A. & John, E. 1999. The biotic and abiotic changes associated with Brachypodium pinnatum dominance in chalk grassland in south-east England. Biol. Conserv. 88: 75-84.
28. Huston, M. 1979. General hypothesis of species-diversity. Am. Nat. 113: 81-101.
29. Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22: 415-427.
30. Jouglet, J.-P. & Dorée, A. 1987. La fauche dans le Festucetum spadiceae. Son incidence sur la dynamique et le potential fourrager d'une pelouse 'à Fétuque paniculée. Cemagref Grenoble-Inerm, Grenoble, FR.
31. Lamont, B.B., Groom, P.K. & Cowling, R.M. 2002. High leaf mass per area of related species assemblages may reflect low rainfall and carbon isotope discrimination rather than low phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations. Funct. Ecol. 16: 403-412.
32. Lavorel, S. & Garnier, E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 16: 545-556.
33. Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes, T.D. A. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 474-478.
34. Lavorel, S., Rochette, C. & Lebreton, J.D. 1999. Functional groups for response to disturbance in Mediterranean old fields. Oikos 84: 480-498.
35. Lavorel S., Diaz, S., Cornelissen, J.H.C, Garnier, E., Harrison, S.P., McIntyre, S., Pausas, J.G., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Roumet, C. & Urcelay, C. 2006. Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? In: Canadell, J., Pitelka, L.F. & Pataki, D. (eds.) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing World. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, US.
36. Liancourt, P., Callaway, R.M. & Michalet, R. 2005a. Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions. Ecology 86: 1611-1618.
37. Liancourt, P., Corcket, E. & Michalet, R. 2005b. Stress tolerance abilities and competitive responses in a watering and fertilization field experiment. J. Veg. Sci. 16: 713-722.
38. Louault, F., Pillar, V.D., Aufrere, J., Garnier, E. & Soussana, J.F. 2005. Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 16: 151-160.
39. MacDougall, A.S. & Turkington. R. 2004. Relative importance of suppression-based and tolerance-based competition in an invaded oak savanna. J. Ecol. 92: 422-434.
40. McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 178-185.
41. McIntyre, S. & Lavorel, S. 2001. Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types. J. Ecol. 89: 209-226.
42. Navas, M.L. & Moreau-Richard, J. 2005. Can traits predict the competitive response of herbaceous Mediterranean species? Acta Oecol. 27: 107-114.
43. Quétier, F., Thébault, A. & Lavorel, S. In press a. Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to past and present land use in subalpine grasslands. Ecol. Monogr.
44. Quétier, F., Liancourt, P., Thebault, A., Davies, I.D. & Lavorel, S. In press b. Predicting past and present management effect on subalpine grasslands using plant traits. J. Appl. Ecol.
45. Reader, R.J. 1998. Relationship between species relative abundance and plant traits for an infertile habitat. Plant Ecol. 134: 43-51.
46. Reich, P.B., Ellsworth, D.S., Walters, M.B., Vose, J.M., Gresham, C., Volin, J.C. & Bowman, W.D. 1999. Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology 80: 1955-1969.
47. Rösch, H., Van Rooyen, M.W. & Theron, G.K. 1997. Predicting competitive interactions between pioneer plant species by using plant traits. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 489-494.
48. Ryser, P. & Aeschlimann, U. 1999. Proportional dry-mass content as an underlying trait for the variation in relative growth rate among 22 Eurasian populations of Dactylis glomerata s.l. Funct. Ecol. 13: 473-482.
49. Ryser, P. & Lambers, H. 1995. Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast-growing and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply. Plant Soil 170: 251-265.
50. Silvertown, J. 2004. Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol. & Evol. 19: 605-611.
51. Suding, K.N., Goldberg, D.E. & Hartman, K.M. 2003. Relationships among species traits: Separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84: 1-16.
52. Tasser, E. & Tappeiner, U. 2002. Impact of land use changes on mountain vegetation. Appl. Veg. Sci. 5: 173-184.
53. Tateno, M. & Chapin, F.S. 1997. The logic of carbon and nitrogen interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Am. Nat. 149: 723-744.
54. Tilman, D. 1985. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am. Nat. 125: 827-852.
55. Tilman, D. 1990. Constraints and tradeoffs - toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58: 3-15.
56. Vendramini, F., Diaz, S., Gurvich, D.E., Wilson, P.J., Thompson, K. & Hodgson, J.G. 2002. Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species. New Phytol. 154: 147-157.
57. Vile, D., Shipley, B. & Garnier, E. 2006. A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. Ecology 87: 504-517.
58. Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J.M. 1997. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277: 494-499.
59. Volkov, I., Banavar, J.R., Hubbell, S.P. & Maritan, A. 2003. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424: 1035-1037.
60. Wardle, D.A., Barker, G.M., Bonner, K.I. & Nicholson, K.S. 1998. Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant species effects in ecosystems? J. Ecol. 86: 405-420.
61. Wedin, D. & Tilman, D. 1993. Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient - initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 199-229.
62. Westoby, M. 1998. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199: 213-227.
63. Westoby, M., Falster, D.S., Moles, A.T., Vesk, P.A. & Wright, I.J. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 125-159.
64. Wilson, P.J., Thompson, K. & Hodgson, J.G. 1999. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytol. 143: 155-162.
65. Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B. & Westoby, M. 2001. Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct. Ecol. 15: 423-434.
66. Wright, I.J., Groom, P.K., Lamont, B.B., Poot, P., Prior, L.D., Reich, P.B., Schulze, E.D., Veneklaas, E.J. & Westoby, M. 2004a. Leaf trait relationships in Australian plant species. Funct. Plant Biol. 31: 551-558.
67. Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D.D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Diemer, M., Flexas, J., Garnier, E., Groom, P.K., Gulias, J., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B.B., Lee, T., Lee, W., Lusk, C., Midgley, J.J., Navas, M.L., Niinemets, U., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., Poorter, H., Poot, P., Prior, L., Pyankov, V.I., Roumet, C., Thomas, S.C., Tjoelker, M.G., Veneklaas, E.J. & Villar, R. 2004b. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821-827.