Approximation spaces based on relations of similarity and dissimilarity of objects

Fundamenta Informaticae

Volumn 79, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 319-333

  Gomolińska, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIALYSTOK   (Poland)

Author keywords

Approximation space; Concept approximation; Dissimilarity relation; Similarity relation

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

APPROXIMATION SPACES; CONCEPT APPROXIMATION; DISSIMILARITY RELATION; SIMILARITY RELATION;

APPROXIMATION THEORY;

EID: 34548617016     PISSN: 01692968     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Albatineh, A. N., Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M., Mihalko, D.: On similarity indices and correction for chance agreement, J. of Classification, 23, 2006, 301-313.
2. Baulieu, F. B.: Two variant axiom systems for presence/absence based dissimilarity coefficients, J. of Classification, 14, 1997, 159-170.
3. Chepoi, V., Fichet, B.: Recognition of Robinsonian dissimilarities, J. of Classification, 14, 1997, 311-325.
4. Cox, T. F., Cox, M. A. A.: A general weigthed two-way dissimilarity coefficient, J. of Classification, 17, 2000, 101-121.
5. Deja, R.: Conflict analysis, in: Rough Set Methods and Applications: New Developments in Knowledge Discovery in Information Systems (L. Polkowski, S. Tsumoto, T. Y. Lin, Eds.), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg New York, 2001, 491-520.
6. Gomolińska, A.: A comparative study of some generalized rough approximations, Fundamenta Informaticae, 51(1-2), 2002, 103-119.
7. Gomolińska, A.: Approximation spaces based on similarity and dissimilarity, in: [13], 2006, 446-457.
8. Gower, J. C., Legendre, P.: Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients, J. of Classification, 3, 1986, 5-48.
9. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowiriski, R.: Handling missing values in rough set analysis of multi-attribute and multi-criteria decision problems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1711, 1999, 146-157.
10. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R., Zanakis, S.: Rough set analysis of information tables with missing values, in: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Decision Sciences Institute, Athens, Greece, 1999, July 4-7, 1999, 1359-1362.
11. Grzymala-Busse, J. W., Grzymala-Busse, W. J., Goodwin, L. K.: Coping with missing attribute values based on closest fit in preterm birth data: A rough set approach, Comput. Intelligence, 17(3), 2001, 425-434.
12. Kryszkiewicz, M.: Properties of incomplete information systems in the framework of rough sets, in: [26], vol. 1, 1998, 422-450.
13. Lindemann, G., Schlingloff, B.-H., Eds.: Proc. Workshop on Concurrency, Specification, and Programming (CS&P'2006), Wandlitz, Germany, 2006, September 27-29, vol. 206 of Informatik-Berichte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, 2006.
14. Lukasiewicz, J.: Die logischen Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, in: Jan Lukasiewicz - Selected Works (L. Borkowski, Ed.), North Holland, Polish Scientific Publ., Amsterdam London, Warsaw, 1970, 16-63, first published in Krakow in 1913.
15. von Luxburg, U.: Statistical Learning with Similarity and Dissimilarity Functions, Ph. D. thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, 2004.
16. MacKay, D. B., Lilly, B.: Percept variance, subadditivity and the metric classification of similarity, and dissimilarity data, J. of Classification, 21, 2004, 185-206.
17. Pawlak, Z.: Information systems - Theoretical foundations, Information Systems, 6(3), 1981, 205-218.
18. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets, Computer and Information Sciences, 11, 1982, 341-356.
19. Pawlak, Z.: On conflicts, Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 1984, 127-134.
20. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991.
21. Pawlak, Z.: An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts, J. of Information Sciences, 109, 1998, 65-78.
22. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rough membership functions, in: Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence (R. R. Yager, M. Fedrizzi, J. Kacprzyk, Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994, 251-271.
23. Peters, J. F., Skowron, A., Stepaniuk, J.: Nearness in approximation spaces, in: [13], 2006, 434-445.
24. Piasta, Z., Lenarcik, A.: Learning rough classifiers from large databases with missing values, in: [26], vol. 1, 1998, 451-499.
25. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning, Int. J. Approximated Reasoning, 15(4), 1996, 333-365.
26. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A., Eds.: Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998.
27. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough mereological calculi of granules: A rough set approach to computation, Comput. Intelligence, 17(3), 2001, 472-492.
28. Ramanna, S., Peters, J. F., Skowron, A.: Analysis of conflict dynamics by risk patterns, in: [13], 2006, 469-479.
29. Skowron, A., Stepaniuk, J.: Tolerance approximation spaces, Fundamenta Informaticae, 27, 1996, 245-253.
30. Słowiński, R., Vanderpooten, D.: Similarity relation as a basis for rough approximations, in: Advances in Machine Intelligence and Soft Computing (P. P. Wang, Ed.), vol. 4, Duke University Press, 1997, 17-33.
31. Stefanowski, J., Tsoukiàs, A.: Incomplete information tables and rough classification, Int. J. Comput. Intelligence, 17(3), 2001, 545-566.
32. Wolski, M.: Similarity as nearness: Information quanta, approximation spaces and nearness structures, in: [13], 2006, 424-433.
33. Yao, Y., Zhao, Y.: Conflict analysis based on discernibility and indiscernibility, in: Proc. 1st IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computational Intelligence (FOCI'2007), Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007, April 1-5 (D. Fogel et al., Ed.), 2007, 302-307.
34. Zadeh, L. A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex system and decision processes, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 1973, 28-44.
35. Ziarko, W.: Variable precision rough set model, J. Computer and System Sciences, 46(1), 1993, 39-59.
36. Ziarko, W.: Probabilistic decision tables in the variable precision rough set model, J. Comput. Intelligence, 17(3), 2001, 593-603.